The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutions in 3D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement
Open accessAbstract
We present results of 3D numerical simulations using a finite difference code featuring fixed mesh refinement (FMR), in which a subset of the computational domain is refined in space and time. We apply this code to a series of test cases including a robust stability test, a nonlinear gauge wave and an excised Schwarzschild black hole in an evolving gauge. We find that the mesh refinement results are comparable in accuracy, stability and convergence to unigrid simulations with the same effective resolution. At the same time, the use of FMR reduces the computational resources needed to obtain a given accuracy. Particular care must be taken at the interfaces between coarse and fine grids to avoid a loss of convergence at higher resolutions, and we introduce the use of 'buffer zones' as one resolution of this issue. We also introduce a new method for initial data generation, which enables higher order interpolation in time even from the initial time slice. This FMR system, 'Carpet', is a driver module in the freely available Cactus computational infrastructure, and is able to endow generic existing Cactus simulation modules ('thorns') with FMR with little or no extra effort.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field
Choptuik, M. W. (1993) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.70.9 · Cited by 1,439
Cited by
Rezzolla, L., Giacomazzo, B., Baiotti, L., Granot, J., Kouveliotou, C., & Aloy, M. A. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/2041-8205/732/1/l6 · Cited by 485
Matter effects on binary neutron star waveforms
Read, J. S., Baiotti, L., Creighton, J. D. E., Friedman, J. L., Giacomazzo, B., Kyutoku, K., Markakis, C., Rezzolla, L., Shibata, M., & Taniguchi, K. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.044042 · Cited by 320
Black hole binaries and light fields: Gravitational molecules
Ikeda, T., Bernard, L., Cardoso, V., & Zilhão, M. (2021) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.024020 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Schnetter, E., Hawley, S. H., & Hawke, I.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-02-26
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1465-1488
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W1977139016
- Cited by
- 651
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evolutions in 3D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0264-9381/21/6/014
- The paper
- Schnetter, E., Hawley, S. H., & Hawke, I. (2004). Evolutions in 3D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement. Classical and Quantum Gravity. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/21/6/014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.