The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity
Open accessAbstract
In this work we will consider the concepts of partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity. These concepts provide a method to calculate Dirac observables. The central result of this work is that one can compute Dirac observables for general relativity by dealing with just one constraint. For this we have to introduce spatial diffeomorphism invariant Hamiltonian constraints. It will turn out that these can be made to be Abelian. Furthermore the methods outlined here provide a connection between observables in the spacetime picture, i.e. quantities invariant under spacetime diffeomorphisms, and Dirac observables in the canonical picture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wald, R. M. (1984) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 · Cited by 7,188
Republication of: The dynamics of general relativity
Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., & Misner, C. W. (2008) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-008-0661-1 · Cited by 2,284
Rovelli, C. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755804 · Cited by 2,240
Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity
Thiemann, T. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755682 · Cited by 2,001
Background independent quantum gravity: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/r01 · Cited by 1,951
(1998) · doi:10.12942/lrr-1998-1 · Cited by 917
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/4/011 · Cited by 750
Dust as a standard of space and time in canonical quantum gravity
Brown, J. D., & Kuchař, K. V. (1995) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.51.5600 · Cited by 456
Time in quantum gravity: An hypothesis
Rovelli, C. (1991) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.43.442 · Cited by 445
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/5/012 · Cited by 416
Cited by
BOJOWALD, M. (2005) · 100 Years of Relativity · doi:10.1142/9789812700988_0014 · Cited by 542
Problem of time in quantum gravity
Anderson, E. (2012) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.201200147 · Cited by 302
FUNDAMENTAL STRUCTURE OF LOOP QUANTUM GRAVITY
HAN, M., MA, Y., & HUANG, W. (2007) · International Journal of Modern Physics D · doi:10.1142/s0218271807010894 · Cited by 279
The asymptotic safety scenario in quantum gravity: an introduction
Niedermaier, M. (2007) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/18/r01 · Cited by 264
Improved and perfect actions in discrete gravity
Bahr, B., & Dittrich, B. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.124030 · Cited by 138
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dittrich, B.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2006-10-06
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 6155-6184
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W2170208120
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 7.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0264-9381/23/22/006
- The paper
- Dittrich, B. (2006). Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/23/22/006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.