The DOI matches its Crossref record; 144 of the 144 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Problem of time in quantum gravity
Open accessAbstract
The Problem of Time occurs because the ‘time’ of GR and of ordinary Quantum Theory are mutually incompatible notions. This is problematic in trying to replace these two branches of physics with a single framework in situations in which the conditions of both apply, e.g. in black holes or in the very early universe. Emphasis in this Review is on the Problem of Time being multi‐faceted and on the nature of each of the eight principal facets. Namely, the Frozen Formalism Problem, Configurational Relationalism Problem (formerly Sandwich Problem), Foliation Dependence Problem, Constraint Closure Problem (formerly Functional Evolution Problem), Multiple Choice Problem, Global Problem of Time, Problem of Beables (alias Problem of Observables) and Spacetime Reconstruction/Replacement Problem. Strategizing in this Review is not just centred about the Frozen Formalism Problem facet, but rather about each of the eight facets. Particular emphasis is placed upon A) relationalism as an underpinning of the facets and as a selector of particular strategies (especially a modification of Barbour relationalism, though also with some consideration of Rovelli relationalism). B) Classifying approaches by the full ordering in which they embrace constrain, quantize, find time/history and find observables, rather than only by partial orderings such as “Dirac‐quantize”. C) Foliation (in)dependence and Spacetime Reconstruction for a wide range of physical theories, strategizing centred about the Problem of Beables, the Patching Approach to the Global Problem of Time, and the role of the question‐types considered in physics. D) The Halliwell‐ and Gambini–Porto–Pullin‐type combined Strategies in the context of semiclassical quantum cosmology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wald, R. M. (1984) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226870373.001.0001 · Cited by 7,188
Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: New Edition
von Neumann, J. (2018) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400889921 · Cited by 4,582
Quantum Theory of Gravity. I. The Canonical Theory
DeWitt, B. S. (1967) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.160.1113 · Cited by 3,385
Kiefer, C. (2004) · Cited by 2,923
Quantum gravity at a Lifshitz point
Hořava, P. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.084008 · Cited by 2,666
Rovelli, C. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755804 · Cited by 2,240
Speakable and unspeakable in quantum mechanics
Whitaker, M. A. B. (1988) · Endeavour · doi:10.1016/0160-9327(88)90092-0 · Cited by 2,098
Gravitation: an Introduction to current research
Witten, L. (1962) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 2,004
Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity
Thiemann, T. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755682 · Cited by 2,001
Gravitation, an introduction to current research
Sewell, G. L. (1963) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/0016-0032(63)90691-4 · Cited by 1,942
Cited by
Bojowald, M. (2015) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/78/2/023901 · Cited by 174
Alam, S., Miyatake, H., More, S., Ho, S., & Mandelbaum, R. (2017) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3056 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, E.
- Venue
- Annalen der Physik
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-10-22
- Volume
- 524
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 757-786
- ISSN
- 0003-3804 (ISSN-L)
- 1521-3889
- OpenAlex
- W2033776560
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 144
- FWCI
- 17.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Problem of time in quantum gravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/andp.201200147
- The paper
- Anderson, E. (2012). Problem of time in quantum gravity. Annalen der Physik. https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.201200147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.