Cited by 59

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Black funnels and droplets from the AdS C-metrics

Hubeny, Veronika E, Marolf, Donald, Rangamani, Mukund·2010·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/27/2/025001

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the context of AdS/CFT, specific limits of the AdS4 C-metric are dual to holographic CFTs living on fixed three-dimensional black hole backgrounds.

    “While beyond the scope of this review, it is worth highlighting that, in the context of the AdS/CFT correspondence, specific limits of the AdS 4 C-metric are dual to holographic CFTs living on fixed three-dimensional black hole backgrounds [9,342].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [342]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Maldacena J M, 1998, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys., 2, 231, 10.4310/ATMP.1998.v2.n2.a1 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1103/PhysRevD.44.314 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Emparan R, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 007, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/007 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Emparan R, 2000, J. High Energy Phys., 2000, 021, 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/01/021 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Anber M, 2008, J. High Energy Phys., 2008, 098, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/07/098 · DOI
  6. Anber M M, 2008, J. High Energy Phys., 2008, 026, 10.1088/1126-6708/2008/11/026 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Emparan R, 1999, J. High Energy Phys., 1999, 036, 10.1088/1126-6708/1999/06/036 · DOI
  9. Dias O J C, 2003, Phys. Rev., D67, 064001
  10. 10.1007/s002200050764 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Papadimitriou I, 2005, J. High Energy Phys., 2005, 004, 10.1088/1126-6708/2005/08/004 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/0370-1573(91)90015-E · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hubeny, V. E., Marolf, D., & Rangamani, M.
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2009-12-23
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
025001
ISSN
  • 0264-9381
  • 1361-6382
Cited by
59
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review