The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time
Open accessAbstract
The Carroll group was originally introduced by Levy-Leblond [1] by considering the limit of the Poincaré group as $c\to0$. In this paper an alternative definition, based on the geometric properties of a non-Minkowskian, non-Galilean but nevertheless boost-invariant, space-time structure is proposed. A "duality" with the Galilean limit $c\to\infty$ is established. Our theory is illustrated by Carrollian electromagnetism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Light speed reduction to 17 metres per second in an ultracold atomic gas
Hau, L. V., Harris, S. E., Dutton, Z., & Behroozi, C. H. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/17561 · Cited by 3,923
Gravitational waves in general relativity, VII. Waves from axi-symmetric isolated system
Bondi, H., Van der Burg, M. G. J., & Metzner, A. W. K. (1962) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.0161 · Cited by 2,426
Through the Looking-Glass: And What Alice Found There
Carroll, L. (1871) · University of Florida Digital Collections (University of Florida) · Cited by 1,322
On the Contraction of Groups and Their Representations
Inonu, E., & Wigner, E. P. (1953) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.39.6.510 · Cited by 1,146
Asymptotic Symmetries in Gravitational Theory
Sachs, R. (1962) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.128.2851 · Cited by 989
Aspects of the BMS/CFT correspondence
Barnich, G., & Troessaert, C. (2010) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2010)062 · Cited by 652
Schrödinger, E. (1950) · Cited by 429
Barnich, G., & Troessaert, C. (2011) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2011)105 · Cited by 419
Electromagnetic Waves in Gravitational Fields
Plebanski, J. (1960) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.118.1396 · Cited by 394
Chapter 2 Transformation Optics and the Geometry of Light
Leonhardt, U., & Philbin, T. G. (2009) · Progress in Optics · doi:10.1016/s0079-6638(08)00202-3 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Duval, C., Gibbons, G. W., Horvathy, P. A., & Zhang, P. M.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-04-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 085016
- ISSN
- 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6382
- OpenAlex
- W2024268376
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 5.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0264-9381/31/8/085016
- The paper
- Duval, C., Gibbons, G. W., Horvathy, P. A., & Zhang, P. M. (2014). Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time. Classical and Quantum Gravity. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/8/085016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
