Cited by 38Quantum many-body systemsSpectral Theory in Mathematical PhysicsTheoretical and Computational Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The quartic oscillator: a non-perturbative study by continuous unitary transformations

Open access
Dusuel, Sébastien, Uhrig, Götz S·2004·Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General

Abstract

The quantum quartic oscillator is investigated in order to test the many-body technique of the continuous unitary transformations. The quartic oscillator is sufficiently simple to allow a detailed study and comparison of various approximation schemes. Due to its simplicity, it can be used as pedagogical introduction in the unitary transformations. Both the spectrum and the spectral weights are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0305-4470/37/39/014

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cross validation of a variety of different physical systems is an approach to assess the reliability of AQSs.

    “One approach is by cross validation of a variety of different physical systems (e.g., atoms in optical lattices, ions in traps, and superconductors) [74].”

    From Can one trust quantum simulators? (2012) · cites this paper as [74]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dusuel, S., & Uhrig, G. S.
Affiliations
  • École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
  • University of Cologne (DE)
Venue
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General
Published
2004-09-16
Volume
37
Issue
39
Pages
9275-9294
ISSN
  • 0305-4470 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6447
OpenAlex
W2001520181
Cited by
38
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Condensed Matter Physics › Theoretical and Computational Physics
Keywords
quartic oscillator, continuous unitary transformations, non-perturbative methods, energy spectrum, spectral weight, approximation methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review