Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 234

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multiple scattering of 5-30 keV electrons in evaporated metal films II: Range-energy relations

Open access
Cosslett, V E, Thomas, R N·1964·British Journal of Applied Physics

Abstract

The ranges of electrons in evaporated films of aluminium, copper, silver and gold have been measured for incident energies E 0 between 5 and 20 keV. From electron transmission measurements the maximum range and the extrapolated range were determined. Energy loss measurements gave the mean range and the Thomson-Whiddington range, corresponding to the mean energy E m and the most probable energy E p of the beam, respectively. The mean range, which is directly comparable with that given by the Bethe energy loss law, is found not to be identical with the maximum range as assumed by some authors. In view of its dependence on the experimental conditions, the maximum range appears to have little practical and no theoretical value, whereas the extrapolated range R x is a reproducible quantity. The extrapolated mass-range ρ R x is proportional to E 0 3/2 and is almost independent of atomic number in the energy range studied. A relationship between R x and the Lenard absorption coefficient is found to exist. The Thomson-Whiddington `constant' does not have a unique value even for a given element at a given value of E 0 because the relation between thickness and E p 2 is not linear for very thin films. The form of this relation agrees with that predicted by the Landau energy loss expression, but the experimental values of E p are 25-30% below the theoretical values. A square law is, however, strictly valid for the mean energy E m and gives an unambiguous definition of the range. Differences between the rate of fall of E m 2 with thickness and that predicted by the Bethe energy loss law are qualitatively explained in terms of the variation of elastic scattering with Z and E 0 . The mean energy loss is always greater than predicted by the Bethe law, whilst the most probable loss is less than predicted by the Landau expression and always much less than the mean loss. In the thinnest films the magnitude of the most probable loss is about 15% greater than that expected from the characteristic (`plasma') energy loss; in thicker films it is three to five times greater. In general the differently defined ranges bear a simple relation to each other and to the `ultimate' range R B found by integrating the Bethe energy loss expression, but departures from this scaling rule are found below 10 keV. Extrapolation of the ( R x , R B ) plot yields an intercept similar to that found in phosphors by Ehrenberg and King, but an order of magnitude smaller. The fact that both R x and R max are appreciably greater than R B at low energies, especially in Al, is explained as due to the neglect of straggling of energy losses in deriving the Bethe expression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0508-3443/15/11/305

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 234

Metadata

Authors
Cosslett, V. E., & Thomas, R. N.
Venue
British Journal of Applied Physics
Published
1964-11
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1283-1300
ISSN
0508-3443 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985969300
Cited by
234
References
0
FWCI
5.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple scattering of 5-30 keV electrons in evaporated metal films II: Range-energy relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0508-3443/15/11/305
The paper
Cosslett, V. E., & Thomas, R. N. (1964). Multiple scattering of 5-30 keV electrons in evaporated metal films II: Range-energy relations. British Journal of Applied Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0508-3443/15/11/305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.