The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On secondary electron emission and its semi-empirical description
Open accessAbstract
The description of secondary electron emission, as presented by plasma-material interaction fusion compendia, is demonstrated to be outdated both in its theoretical and experimental aspects. As a consequence, the recommended treatment leads to a strong overestimation of the secondary electron emission yields for tokamak relevant materials. Reliable experimental data-sets, in fusion energy ranges, are identified after a detailed review of a recently updated electron-solid interaction database and previously published experimental results. A novel semi-empirical approach is proposed for the description of the secondary electron emission yield. Application of the approach for a large number of solids reveals an unprecedented agreement with experimental data. The present results can serve as a reliable input for future quantitative investigations of the effect of secondary electron emission on various aspects of scrape-off-layer physics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In fact, they feature a kinetic treatment of the ion species (and in some cases of the neutrals as well) so that CEX collisions are correctly captured, and a fluid modeling of the fastest species, the electrons, which are subject to conservation equations.”
From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [234]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Hybrid models 225-234 have therefore emerged in this context, as they represent the best compromise in terms of accuracy and computational cost for modeling the plasma thruster plume expansion and its interaction with the spacecraft.”
From Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms (2023) · cites this paper as [234]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 90
- 10.1007/978-3-540-38967-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/0029-554X(79)90734-1 · DOI
- 10.1029/JA085iA08p04125 · DOI
- 10.1109/16.3387 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.872811 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2158698 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-0067-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3115(86)90047-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-3115(87)90332-1 · DOI
- Matthews G F, 1990, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 32, 1301, 10.1088/0741-3335/32/14/004 · DOI
- Stangeby P C, 1990, Nucl. Fusion, 30, 1225, 10.1088/0029-5515/30/7/005 · DOI
- Rozhansky V, 2009, Nucl. Fusion, 49, 10.1088/0029-5515/49/2/025007 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4835295 · DOI
- Smirnov R D, 2007, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 49, 347, 10.1088/0741-3335/49/4/001 · DOI
- Krasheninnikov S I, 2011, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 53
- Ratynskaia S, 2013, Nucl. Fusion, 53, 10.1088/0029-5515/53/12/123002 · DOI
- Vignitchouk L, 2014, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 56, 10.1088/0741-3335/56/9/095005 · DOI
- Vaverka J, 2014, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 56, 10.1088/0741-3335/56/2/025001 · DOI
- 10.1088/0029-5515/24/S1/001 · DOI
- Thomas E W, 1991, 1, 79
- Kollath R, 1956, Handbuch der Physik, 21
- 10.1103/PhysRev.78.780 · DOI
- Bruining H, 1954, Physics and Applications of Secondary Electron Emission
- Dekker A J ed F Seitz, 1958, Solid State Physics, 6, 251, 10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60728-6 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.322061 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-03883-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/sca.1996.4950180204 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1331645 · DOI
- Shimizu R, 1992, Rep. Prog. Phys., 55, 487, 10.1088/0034-4885/55/4/002 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0368-2048(99)00082-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0039-6028(95)00474-2 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1662156 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3608046 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.106.874 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.482 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.107.977 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.103.292 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1722794 · DOI
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.9.245 · DOI
- 10.1109/16.34278 · DOI
- 10.1109/16.34278 · DOI
- 10.1109/16.34278 · DOI
- 10.1109/16.34278 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.332840 · DOI
- 10.1002/sia.2107 · DOI
- Cazaux J, 2005, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 38, 2433, 10.1088/0022-3727/38/14/020 · DOI
- 10.1086/157165 · DOI
- Whipple E C, 1981, Rep. Prog. Phys., 44, 1197, 10.1088/0034-4885/44/11/002 · DOI
- Meyer-Vernet N, 1982, Astron. Astrophys., 105, 98
- 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.007 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPS.2007.893750 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.94.960 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1735348 · DOI
- Cosslett V E, 1964, Br. J. Appl. Phys., 15, 1283, 10.1088/0508-3443/15/11/305 · DOI
- Fitting H-J, 1975, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 8, 1480, 10.1088/0022-3727/8/13/009 · DOI
- Salehi M, 1980, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 13, 281, 10.1088/0022-3727/13/2/025 · DOI
- 10.1002/sca.4950170501 · DOI
- Tolias P, 2014, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion, 56
- 10.1063/1.1663306 · DOI
- 10.1016/0039-6028(80)90456-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nimb.2009.06.025 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.045414 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.3.1215 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-4332(96)00692-7 · DOI
- 10.1002/sca.20124 · DOI
- Bronstein I M, 1969, Secondary Electron Emission
- Assa’d A M D, 1998, Scanning Microsc., 12, 185
- 10.1002/sca.20091 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-800265-0.00001-1 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.373682 · DOI
- Thomas S, 1969, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 2, 1539, 10.1088/0022-3727/2/11/308 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.95.345 · DOI
- 10.1887/0750305592 · DOI
- Haynes W M (ed), 2013, Handbook of Chemistry and Physics
- Czack G, 1993, Gmelin Handbook of Inorganic and Organometallic Chemistry, A4
- 10.1103/PhysRev.26.346 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.26.346 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.26.346 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.26.346 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.26.346 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.26.346 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.26.346 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.26.346 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.80.925 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.elspec.2004.04.003 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRev.56.699 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4419-9583-4 · DOI
- Bronstein I M, 1967, Sov. Phys.—Solid State, 9, 731
- 10.1016/S0022-3115(98)00312-2 · DOI
- Sodha M S, 1971, Adv. Plasma Phys., 4, 219
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Plasma propulsion modeling with particle-based algorithms
Taccogna, F., Cichocki, F., Eremin, D., Fubiani, G., & Garrigues, L. (2023) · Journal of Applied Physics · doi:10.1063/5.0153862 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Tolias, P.
- Affiliations
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Tolias, P
- ORCID
- Tolias, P
- Venue
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-11-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 123002
- ISSN
- 0741-3335 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6587
- OpenAlex
- W2016847310
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Fusion materials and technologies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Surfaces, Coatings and Films › Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Magnetic confinement fusion research
- Keywords
- secondary electron emission, semi-empirical model, electron-solid interaction, scrape-off layer, plasma-material interaction, emission yield
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review