The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The electronic structure and optical response of rutile, anatase and brookite TiO2
Open accessAbstract
In this study, we present a combined density functional theory and many-body perturbation theory study on the electronic and optical properties of TiO(2) brookite as well as the tetragonal phases rutile and anatase. The electronic structure and linear optical response have been calculated from the Kohn-Sham band structure applying (semi)local as well as nonlocal screened hybrid exchange-correlation density functionals. Single-particle excitations are treated within the GW approximation for independent quasiparticles. For optical response calculations, two-particle excitations have been included by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation for Coulomb correlated electron-hole pairs. On this methodological basis, gap data and optical spectra for the three major phases of TiO(2) are provided. The common characteristics of brookite with the rutile and anatase phases, which have been discussed more comprehensively in the literature, are highlighted. Furthermore, the comparison of the present calculations with measured optical response data of rutile indicate that discrepancies discussed in numerous earlier studies are due to the measurements rather than related to an insufficient theoretical description.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple
Perdew, J. P., Burke, K., & Ernzerhof, M. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 · Cited by 215,824
Projector augmented-wave method
Blöchl, P. E. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953 · Cited by 92,732
From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method
Kresse, G., & Joubert, D. (1999) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.59.1758 · Cited by 85,307
Self-Consistent Equations Including Exchange and Correlation Effects
Kohn, W., & Sham, L. J. (1965) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.140.a1133 · Cited by 64,135
Cited by
QuantumATK: an integrated platform of electronic and atomic-scale modelling tools
Smidstrup, S., Markussen, T., Vancraeyveld, P., Wellendorff, J., Schneider, J., Gunst, T., Verstichel, B., Stradi, D., Khomyakov, P. A., Vej-Hansen, U. G., et al. (2020) · Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter · doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab4007 · Cited by 1,920
Kapilashrami, M., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y.-S., Hagfeldt, A., & Guo, J. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr5000893 · Cited by 508
Mini review on photocatalysis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and their solar applications
Lan, Y., Lu, Y., & Ren, Z. (2013) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.04.002 · Cited by 419
Application of Nanostructured TiO2 in UV Photodetectors: A Review
Li, Z., Li, Z., Zuo, C., & Fang, X. (2022) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202109083 · Cited by 371
Band gaps from the Tran-Blaha modified Becke-Johnson approach: A systematic investigation
Jiang, H. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4798706 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Landmann, M., Rauls, E., & Schmidt, W. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-04-19
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 195503
- ISSN
- 0953-8984 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-648X
- OpenAlex
- W1974940953
- Cited by
- 660
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 14.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The electronic structure and optical response of rutile, anatase and brookite TiO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0953-8984/24/19/195503
- The paper
- Landmann, M., Rauls, E., & Schmidt, W. G. (2012). The electronic structure and optical response of rutile, anatase and brookite TiO2. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/24/19/195503
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.