Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Simplified models for LHC new physics searches

Open access
Alves, Daniele, Arkani-Hamed, Nima, Arora, Sanjay, Bai, Yang, Baumgart, Matthew, Berger, Joshua, Buckley, Matthew, Butler, Bart, Chang, Spencer, Cheng, Hsin-Chia, Cheung, Clifford, Chivukula, R Sekhar, Cho, Won Sang, Cotta, Randy, D’Alfonso, Mariarosaria, Hedri, Sonia El, Essig, Rouven, Evans, Jared A, Fitzpatrick, Liam, Fox, Patrick, Franceschini, Roberto, Freitas, Ayres, Gainer, James S, Gershtein, Yuri, Gray, Richard, Gregoire, Thomas, Gripaios, Ben, Gunion, Jack, Han, Tao, Haas, Andy, Hansson, Per, Hewett, JoAnne, Hits, Dmitry, Hubisz, Jay, Izaguirre, Eder, Kaplan, Jared, Katz, Emanuel, Kilic, Can, Kim, Hyung-Do, Kitano, Ryuichiro, Koay, Sue Ann, Ko, Pyungwon, Krohn, David, Kuflik, Eric, Lewis, Ian, Lisanti, Mariangela, Liu, Tao, Liu, Zhen, Lu, Ran, Luty, Markus, Meade, Patrick, Morrissey, David, Mrenna, Stephen, Nojiri, Mihoko, Okui, Takemichi, Padhi, Sanjay, Papucci, Michele, Park, Michael, Park, Myeonghun, Perelstein, Maxim, Peskin, Michael, Phalen, Daniel, Rehermann, Keith, Rentala, Vikram, Roy, Tuhin, Ruderman, Joshua T, Sanz, Veronica, Schmaltz, Martin, Schnetzer, Stephen, Schuster, Philip, Schwaller, Pedro, Schwartz, Matthew D, Schwartzman, Ariel, Shao, Jing, Shelton, Jessie, Shih, David, Shu, Jing, Silverstein, Daniel, Simmons, Elizabeth, Somalwar, Sunil, Spannowsky, Michael, Spethmann, Christian, Strassler, Matthew, Su, Shufang, Tait, Tim, Thomas, Brooks, Thomas, Scott, Toro, Natalia, Volansky, Tomer, Wacker, Jay, Waltenberger, Wolfgang, Yavin, Itay, Yu, Felix, Zhao, Yue, Zurek, Kathryn, LHC New Physics Working Group·2012·Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics

Abstract

This document proposes a collection of simplified models relevant to the design of new-physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the characterization of their results. Both ATLAS and CMS have already presented some results in terms of simplified models, and we encourage them to continue and expand this effort, which supplements both signature-based results and benchmark model interpretations. A simplified model is defined by an effective Lagrangian describing the interactions of a small number of new particles. Simplified models can equally well be described by a small number of masses and cross-sections. These parameters are directly related to collider physics observables, making simplified models a particularly effective framework for evaluating searches and a useful starting point for characterizing positive signals of new physics. This document serves as an official summary of the results from the 'Topologies for Early LHC Searches' workshop, held at SLAC in September of 2010, the purpose of which was to develop a set of representative models that can be used to cover all relevant phase space in experimental searches. Particular emphasis is placed on searches relevant for the first ∼50–500 pb −1 of data and those motivated by supersymmetric models. This note largely summarizes material posted at http://lhcnewphysics.org/ , which includes simplified model definitions, Monte Carlo material, and supporting contacts within the theory community. We also comment on future developments that may be useful as more data is gathered and analyzed by the experiments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0954-3899/39/10/105005

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Metadata

Authors
Alves, D., Arkani-Hamed, N., Arora, S., Bai, Y., Baumgart, M., Berger, J., Buckley, M., Butler, B., Chang, S., Cheng, H.-C., Cheung, C., Chivukula, R. S., Cho, W. S., Cotta, R., D’Alfonso, M., Hedri, S. E., Essig, R., Evans, J. A., Fitzpatrick, L., Fox, P., Franceschini, R., Freitas, A., Gainer, J. S., Gershtein, Y., Gray, R., Gregoire, T., Gripaios, B., Gunion, J., Han, T., Haas, A., Hansson, P., Hewett, J., Hits, D., Hubisz, J., Izaguirre, E., Kaplan, J., Katz, E., Kilic, C., Kim, H.-D., Kitano, R., Koay, S. A., Ko, P., Krohn, D., Kuflik, E., Lewis, I., Lisanti, M., Liu, T., Liu, Z., Lu, R., Luty, M., Meade, P., Morrissey, D., Mrenna, S., Nojiri, M., Okui, T., Padhi, S., Papucci, M., Park, M., Park, M., Perelstein, M., Peskin, M., Phalen, D., Rehermann, K., Rentala, V., Roy, T., Ruderman, J. T., Sanz, V., Schmaltz, M., Schnetzer, S., Schuster, P., Schwaller, P., Schwartz, M. D., Schwartzman, A., Shao, J., Shelton, J., Shih, D., Shu, J., Silverstein, D., Simmons, E., Somalwar, S., Spannowsky, M., Spethmann, C., Strassler, M., Su, S., Tait, T., Thomas, B., Thomas, S., Toro, N., Volansky, T., Wacker, J., Waltenberger, W., Yavin, I., Yu, F., Zhao, Y., Zurek, K., & LHC New Physics Working Group
Venue
Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
Published
2012-09-14
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
105005
ISSN
  • 0954-3899 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6471
OpenAlex
W2115309022
Cited by
476
References
69
FWCI
25.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simplified models for LHC new physics searches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0954-3899/39/10/105005
The paper
Alves, D., Arkani-Hamed, N., Arora, S., Bai, Y., Baumgart, M., Berger, J., Buckley, M., Butler, B., Chang, S., Cheng, H.-C., Cheung, C., Chivukula, R. S., Cho, W. S., Cotta, R., D’Alfonso, M., Hedri, S. E., Essig, R., Evans, J. A., Fitzpatrick, L., . . . LHC New Physics Working Group. (2012). Simplified models for LHC new physics searches. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/39/10/105005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.