The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simplified models for LHC new physics searches
Open accessAbstract
This document proposes a collection of simplified models relevant to the design of new-physics searches at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the characterization of their results. Both ATLAS and CMS have already presented some results in terms of simplified models, and we encourage them to continue and expand this effort, which supplements both signature-based results and benchmark model interpretations. A simplified model is defined by an effective Lagrangian describing the interactions of a small number of new particles. Simplified models can equally well be described by a small number of masses and cross-sections. These parameters are directly related to collider physics observables, making simplified models a particularly effective framework for evaluating searches and a useful starting point for characterizing positive signals of new physics. This document serves as an official summary of the results from the 'Topologies for Early LHC Searches' workshop, held at SLAC in September of 2010, the purpose of which was to develop a set of representative models that can be used to cover all relevant phase space in experimental searches. Particular emphasis is placed on searches relevant for the first ∼50–500 pb −1 of data and those motivated by supersymmetric models. This note largely summarizes material posted at http://lhcnewphysics.org/ , which includes simplified model definitions, Monte Carlo material, and supporting contacts within the theory community. We also comment on future developments that may be useful as more data is gathered and analyzed by the experiments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
Self-citationSjöstrand, T., Mrenna, S., & Skands, P. (2006) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/05/026 · Cited by 8,952
Self-citationAn Alternative to Compactification
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4690 · Cited by 7,217
Locally Supersymmetric Grand Unification
Chamseddine, A. H., Arnowitt, R., & Nath, P. (1982) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.49.970 · Cited by 1,600
Out of this world supersymmetry breaking
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(99)00359-4 · Cited by 1,446
The minimal composite Higgs model
Agashe, K., Contino, R., & Pomarol, A. (2005) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.04.035 · Cited by 1,426
Gauge models with spontaneously broken local supersymmetry
Barbieri, R., Ferrara, S., & Savoy, C. A. (1982) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(82)90685-2 · Cited by 1,397
Theories with gauge-mediated supersymmetry breaking
Giudice, G. F., & Rattazzi, R. (1999) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(99)00042-3 · Cited by 1,391
MadGraph/MadEvent v4: the new web generation
Alwall, J., Demin, P., Visscher, S. D., Frederix, R., Herquet, M., Maltoni, F., Plehn, T., Rainwater, D. L., & Stelzer, T. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/09/028 · Cited by 1,325
Giudice, G. F., Rattazzi, R., Luty, M. A., & Murayama, H. (1998) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1998/12/027 · Cited by 1,299
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alves, D., Arkani-Hamed, N., Arora, S., Bai, Y., Baumgart, M., Berger, J., Buckley, M., Butler, B., Chang, S., Cheng, H.-C., Cheung, C., Chivukula, R. S., Cho, W. S., Cotta, R., D’Alfonso, M., Hedri, S. E., Essig, R., Evans, J. A., Fitzpatrick, L., Fox, P., Franceschini, R., Freitas, A., Gainer, J. S., Gershtein, Y., Gray, R., Gregoire, T., Gripaios, B., Gunion, J., Han, T., Haas, A., Hansson, P., Hewett, J., Hits, D., Hubisz, J., Izaguirre, E., Kaplan, J., Katz, E., Kilic, C., Kim, H.-D., Kitano, R., Koay, S. A., Ko, P., Krohn, D., Kuflik, E., Lewis, I., Lisanti, M., Liu, T., Liu, Z., Lu, R., Luty, M., Meade, P., Morrissey, D., Mrenna, S., Nojiri, M., Okui, T., Padhi, S., Papucci, M., Park, M., Park, M., Perelstein, M., Peskin, M., Phalen, D., Rehermann, K., Rentala, V., Roy, T., Ruderman, J. T., Sanz, V., Schmaltz, M., Schnetzer, S., Schuster, P., Schwaller, P., Schwartz, M. D., Schwartzman, A., Shao, J., Shelton, J., Shih, D., Shu, J., Silverstein, D., Simmons, E., Somalwar, S., Spannowsky, M., Spethmann, C., Strassler, M., Su, S., Tait, T., Thomas, B., Thomas, S., Toro, N., Volansky, T., Wacker, J., Waltenberger, W., Yavin, I., Yu, F., Zhao, Y., Zurek, K., & LHC New Physics Working Group
- Venue
- Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-09-14
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 105005
- ISSN
- 0954-3899 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6471
- OpenAlex
- W2115309022
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 25.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simplified models for LHC new physics searches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0954-3899/39/10/105005
- The paper
- Alves, D., Arkani-Hamed, N., Arora, S., Bai, Y., Baumgart, M., Berger, J., Buckley, M., Butler, B., Chang, S., Cheng, H.-C., Cheung, C., Chivukula, R. S., Cho, W. S., Cotta, R., D’Alfonso, M., Hedri, S. E., Essig, R., Evans, J. A., Fitzpatrick, L., . . . LHC New Physics Working Group. (2012). Simplified models for LHC new physics searches. Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/39/10/105005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.