The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Associative memory in a network of ‘spiking’ neurons
Open accessAbstract
The Hopfield network provides a simple model of an associative memory in a neuronal structure. It is, however, based on highly artificial assumptions, especially the use of formal two-state neurons or graded-response neurons. The authors address the question of what happens if formal neurons are replaced by a model of ‘spiking’ neurons. They do so in two steps. First, they show how to include refractoriness and noise into a simple threshold model of neuronal spiking. The spike trains resulting from such a model reproduce the distribution of interspike intervals and gain functions found in real neurons. In a second step they connect the model neurons so as to form a large associative memory system. The spike transmission is described by a synaptic kernel which includes axonal delays, ‘Hebbian’ synaptic efficacies, and a realistic postsynaptic response. The collective behaviour of the system is predicted by a set of dynamical equations which are exact in the limit of a large and fully connected network that has to store a finite number of patterns. The authors show that in a stationary retrieval state the statistics of the spiking dynamics is completely wiped out and the system reduces to a network of graded-response neurons. In the case of an oscillatory retrieval state, however, the spiking noise and the internal time constants of the neurons become important and determine the behaviour of the system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
Cited by
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Chaotic Balanced State in a Model of Cortical Circuits
Vreeswijk, C. V., & Sompolinsky, H. (1998) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976698300017214 · Cited by 732
Time structure of the activity in neural network models
Gerstner, W. (1995) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.51.738 · Cited by 527
Self-citationModeling Single-Neuron Dynamics and Computations: A Balance of Detail and Abstraction
Herz, A. V. M., Gollisch, T., Machens, C. K., & Jaeger, D. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127240 · Cited by 451
Mathematical formulations of Hebbian learning
Gerstner, W., & Kistler, W. M. (2002) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-002-0353-y · Cited by 408
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerstner, W., & van Hemmen, J.
- Venue
- Network: Computation in Neural Systems
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1992-05-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-164
- ISSN
- 0954-898X (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6536
- OpenAlex
- W2102173149
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Associative memory in a network of ‘spiking’ neurons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0954-898x/3/2/004
- The paper
- Gerstner, W., & van Hemmen, J. (1992). Associative memory in a network of ‘spiking’ neurons. Network: Computation in Neural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-898x/3/2/004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.