The DOI matches its Crossref record; 99 of the 99 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Time structure of the activity in neural network models
Open accessAbstract
Several neural network models in continuous time are reconsidered in the framework of a general mean-field theory which is exact in the limit of a large and fully connected network. The theory assumes pointlike spikes which are generated by a renewal process. The effect of spikes on a receiving neuron is described by a linear response kernel which is the dominant term in a weak-coupling expansion. It is shown that the resulting ``spike response model'' is the most general renewal model with linear inputs. The standard integrate-and-fire model forms a special case. In a network structure with several pools of identical spiking neurons, the global states and the dynamic evolution are determined by a nonlinear integral equation which describes the effective interaction within and between different pools. We derive explicit stability criteria for stationary (incoherent) and oscillatory (coherent) solutions. It is shown that the stationary state of noiseless systems is ``almost always'' unstable. Noise suppresses fast oscillations and stabilizes the system. Furthermore, collective oscillations are stable only if the firing occurs while the synaptic potential is increasing. In particular, collective oscillations in a network with delayless excitatory interaction are at most semistable. Inhibitory interactions with short delays or excitatory interactions with long delays lead to stable oscillations. Our general results allow a straightforward application to different network models with spiking neurons. Furthermore, the theory allows an estimation of the errors introduced in firing rate or ``graded-response'' models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764 · Cited by 23,191
Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.79.8.2554 · Cited by 19,270
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02478259 · Cited by 18,566
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
(1996) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(96)90463-0 · Cited by 14,281
Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1962) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1962.sp006837 · Cited by 13,680
Hopfield, J. J. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.10.3088 · Cited by 6,918
Gray, C. M., König, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338334a0 · Cited by 4,183
Excitatory and Inhibitory Interactions in Localized Populations of Model Neurons
Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1972) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(72)86068-5 · Cited by 3,623
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37
(2024) · doi:10.52202/079017 · Cited by 2,791
Ferrier lecture. Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex
Hubel, D. H., & Wiesel, T. N. (1977) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1977.0085 · Cited by 2,608
Cited by
A Review of the Integrate-and-fire Neuron Model: I. Homogeneous Synaptic Input
Burkitt, A. N. (2006) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s00422-006-0068-6 · Cited by 1,208
Error-backpropagation in temporally encoded networks of spiking neurons
Bohte, S. M., Kok, J. N., & La Poutré, H. (2002) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/s0925-2312(01)00658-0 · Cited by 1,021
Fast Global Oscillations in Networks of Integrate-and-Fire Neurons with Low Firing Rates
Brunel, N., & Hakim, V. (1999) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/089976699300016179 · Cited by 894
Fluctuating synaptic conductances recreate in vivo-like activity in neocortical neurons
Destexhe, A., Rudolph, M., Fellous, J.-M., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2001) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/s0306-4522(01)00344-x · Cited by 642
Computing with Spiking Neuron Networks
Paugam-Moisy, H., & Bohte, S. (2012) · Handbook of Natural Computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-92910-9_10 · Cited by 272
Metadata
- Authors
- Gerstner, W.
- Venue
- Physical Review E
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1995-01-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 738-758
- ISSN
- 1063-651X (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3787
- OpenAlex
- W1987994242
- Cited by
- 527
- References
- 99
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time structure of the activity in neural network models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physreve.51.738
- The paper
- Gerstner, W. (1995). Time structure of the activity in neural network models. Physical Review E. https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.51.738
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.