The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating machine learning algorithms estimating tremor severity ratings on the Bain–Findley scale
Abstract
Tremor is a debilitating symptom of some movement disorders. Effective treatment, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS), is contingent upon frequent clinical assessments using instruments such as the Bain–Findley tremor rating scale (BTRS). Many patients, however, do not have access to frequent clinical assessments. Wearable devices have been developed to provide patients with access to frequent objective assessments outside the clinic via telemedicine. Nevertheless, the information they report is not in the form of BTRS ratings. One way to transform this information into BTRS ratings is through linear regression models (LRMs). Another, potentially more accurate method is through machine learning classifiers (MLCs). This study aims to compare MLCs and LRMs, and identify the most accurate model that can transform objective tremor information into tremor severity ratings on the BTRS. Nine participants with upper limb tremor had their DBS stimulation amplitude varied while they performed clinical upper-extremity exercises. Tremor features were acquired using the tremor biomechanics analysis laboratory (TREMBAL). Movement disorder specialists rated tremor severity on the BTRS from video recordings. Seven MLCs and 6 LRMs transformed TREMBAL features into tremor severity ratings on the BTRS using the specialists’ ratings as training data. The weighted Cohen’s kappa ( κ w ) defined the models’ rating accuracy. This study shows that the Random Forest MLC was the most accurate model ( κ w = 0.81) at transforming tremor information into BTRS ratings, thereby improving the clinical interpretation of tremor information obtained from wearable devices.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Yohanandan et al. compared linear regression models with machine learning classifiers and achieved tremor severity ratings on the Bain-Findley tremor rating scale.
“Yohanandan et al. [31] compared the performance of linear regression models with machine learning classifiers and achieved tremor severity ratings on the Bain-Findley tremor rating scale.”
From Detection and Quantification of Resting Tremor in Parkinson's Disease Using Long-Term Acceleration Data (2021) · cites this paper as [31]
Citations
Cites
Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00994018 · Cited by 59,421
Validation for tremor quantification of an electromagnetic tracking device
O'Suilleabhain, P. E., & Dewey, R. B. (2001) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.1064 · Cited by 53
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Bhidayasiri, 2005, Differential diagnosis of common tremor syndromes, Postgrad. Med. J., 81, 756, 10.1136/pgmj.2005.032979 · DOI · Paper page
- Andrade, 2013, Human tremor: origins, detection and quantification, Pract. Appl. Biomed. Eng., 10.5772/54524) · DOI
- Thenganatt, 2015, The relationship between essential tremor and Parkinson’s disease, Parkinsonism Related Disorders, 22, S162, 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.09.032 · DOI
- Bain, 2002, The management of tremor, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 72, i3, 10.1136/jnnp.72.suppl_1.i3 · DOI
- Perera, 2015, Clinical validation of a precision electromagnetic tremor measurement system in participants receiving deep brain stimulation for essential tremor, Physiol. Meas., 37, 1516, 10.1088/0967-3334/37/9/1516 · DOI
- Bain, 1993, Assessing tremor severity, J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 56, 868, 10.1136/jnnp.56.8.868 · DOI
- Darnall, 2012, Application of machine learning and numerical analysis to classify tremor in patients affected with essential tremor or Parkinson’s disease, Gerontechnology, 10, 208, 10.4017/gt.2012.10.4.002.00 · DOI
- Giuffrida, 2009, Clinically deployable Kinesia technology for automated tremor assessment, Mov. Disorders Off. J. Mov. Disorder Soc., 24, 723, 10.1002/mds.22445 · DOI
- Beuter, 1994, The measurement of tremor using simple laser systems, J. Neurosci. Methods, 53, 47, 10.1016/0165-0270(94)90143-0 · DOI
- Blumrosen, 2012, Noncontact tremor characterization using low-power wideband radar technology, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 59, 674, 10.1109/TBME.2011.2177977 · DOI
- Spyers-Ashby, 2000, Reliability of tremor measurements using a multidimensional electromagnetic sensor system, Clin. Rehabil., 14, 425, 10.1191/0269215500cr328oa · DOI
- Yang, 2003, Visualization of large category map for Internet browsing, Decis. Support Syst., 35, 89, 10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00101-X · DOI
- Perera, 2015, Deep brain stimulation wash-in and wash-out times for tremor and speech, Brain Stimulat., 8, 359, 10.1016/j.brs.2015.01.156 · DOI
- Peng, 2005, Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 27, 1226, 10.1109/TPAMI.2005.159 · DOI
- Jakobsson, 2005, Statistical methods for assessing agreement for ordinal data, Scand. J. Caring Sci., 19, 427, 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00368.x · DOI
- Breiman, 2001, Random forests, Mach. Learn., 45, 5, 10.1023/A:1010933404324 · DOI · Paper page
- Ruck, 1990, The multilayer perceptron as an approximation to a Bayes optimal discriminant function, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 1, 296, 10.1109/72.80266 · DOI
- Friedl, 1997, Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data, Remote Sens. Environ., 61, 399, 10.1016/S0034-4257(97)00049-7 · DOI
- Chen, 2009, Feature selection for text classification with Naïve Bayes, Expert Syst. Appl., 36, 5432, 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.054 · DOI
- Chen, 1991, Orthogonal least squares learning algorithm for radial basis function networks, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 2, 302, 10.1109/72.80341 · DOI
- Friedman, 1997, Bayesian network classifiers, Mach. Learn., 29, 131, 10.1023/A:1007465528199 · DOI · Paper page
- McHugh, 2012, Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic, Biochem. Med., 22, 276, 10.11613/BM.2012.031 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kim, H. B., Lee, W. W., Kim, A., Lee, H. J., Park, H. Y., Jeon, H. S., Kim, S. K., Jeon, B., & Park, K. S. (2018) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.02.007 · Cited by 124
Yuan, H., Liu, S., Liu, J., Lin, H., Yang, C., Cai, X., Zeng, L., & Li, S. (2021) · Mathematical Problems in Engineering · doi:10.1155/2021/5669932 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Yohanandan, S. A. C., Jones, M., Peppard, R., Tan, J. L., McDermott, H. J., & Perera, T.
- Affiliations
- Bionics Institute (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Yohanandan, Shivanthan A C
- Venue
- Measurement Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-11-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 125702
- ISSN
- 0957-0233 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6501
- OpenAlex
- W2548045627
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Measurement Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- State Government of Victoria
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Deep Brain Stimulation and Movement Disorders
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Keywords
- upper limb tremor, deep brain stimulation, wearable devices, telemedicine, random forest, linear regression, machine learning classifiers, movement disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review