The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nano-biotechnology: carbon nanofibres as improved neural and orthopaedic implants
Abstract
For the continuous monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment of neural tissue, implantable probes are required. However, sometimes such neural probes (usually composed of silicon) become encapsulated with non-conductive, undesirable glial scar tissue. Similarly for orthopaedic implants, biomaterials (usually titanium and/or titanium alloys) often become encapsulated with undesirable soft fibrous, not hard bony, tissue. Although possessing intriguing electrical and mechanical properties for neural and orthopaedic applications, carbon nanofibres/nanotubes have not been widely considered for these applications to date. The present work developed a carbon nanofibre reinforced polycarbonate urethane (PU) composite in an attempt to determine the possibility of using carbon nanofibres (CNs) as either neural or orthopaedic prosthetic devices. Electrical and mechanical characterization studies determined that such composites have properties suitable for neural and orthopaedic applications. More importantly, cell adhesion experiments revealed for the first time the promise these materials have to increase neural (nerve cell) and osteoblast (bone-forming cell) functions. In contrast, functions of cells that contribute to glial scar-tissue formation for neural prostheses (astrocytes) and fibrous-tissue encapsulation events for bone implants (fibroblasts) decreased on PU composites containing increasing amounts of CNs. In this manner, this study provided the first evidence of the future that CN formulations may have towards interacting with neural and bone cells which is important for the design of successful neural probes and orthopaedic implants, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nanocrystalline intermetallic compounds — An approach to ductility?
Bohn, R., Haubold, T., Birringer, R., & Gleiter, H. (1991) · Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia · doi:10.1016/0956-716x(91)90230-x · Cited by 154
Cited by
The biocompatibility of carbon nanotubes
Smart, S. K., Cassady, A. I., Lu, G. Q., & Martin, D. J. (2006) · Carbon · doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.011 · Cited by 1,011
Polypyrrole-coated electrospun PLGA nanofibers for neural tissue applications
Lee, J. Y., Bashur, C. A., Goldstein, A. S., & Schmidt, C. E. (2009) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.042 · Cited by 735
Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, L., Prabhakaran, M. P., Morshed, M., Nasr-Esfahani, M. H., Baharvand, H., Kiani, S., Al-Deyab, S. S., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine · doi:10.1002/term.383 · Cited by 698
Carbon Nanotube Substrates Boost Neuronal Electrical Signaling
Lovat, V., Pantarotto, D., Lagostena, L., Cacciari, B., Grandolfo, M., Righi, M., Spalluto, G., Prato, M., & Ballerini, L. (2005) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl050637m · Cited by 648
Nanomaterials for Neural Interfaces
Kotov, N. A., Winter, J. O., Clements, I. P., Jan, E., Timko, B. P., Campidelli, S., Pathak, S., Mazzatenta, A., Lieber, C. M., Prato, M., et al. (2009) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.200801984 · Cited by 504
Metadata
- Authors
- Webster, T. J., Waid, M. C., McKenzie, J. L., Price, R. L., & Ejiofor, J. U.
- Venue
- Nanotechnology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2004-01-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 009
- ISSN
- 0957-4484 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6528
- OpenAlex
- W2103215282
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nano-biotechnology: carbon nanofibres as improved neural and orthopaedic implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0957-4484/15/1/009
- The paper
- Webster, T. J., Waid, M. C., McKenzie, J. L., Price, R. L., & Ejiofor, J. U. (2004). Nano-biotechnology: carbon nanofibres as improved neural and orthopaedic implants. Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/15/1/009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.