Silk and PEG as means to stiffen a parylene probe for insertion in the brain: toward a double time-scale tool for local drug delivery
Open accessAbstract
The use of soft materials as substrate for neural probes aims at achieving better compliance with the surrounding neurons while maintaining minimal rejection. Many strategies have emerged to enable such probes to penetrate the cortex, among which the use of resorbable polymers. We performed several tests involving two resorbable polymers considered most promising: polyethylene glycol (PEG) and silk fibroin (SF) from Bombyx Mori silkworms. Our coating method provides a repeatable, uniform structure optimized for a stress-reduced insertion of a parylene-C neural probe. Standard compression tests as well as in vitro and in vivo insertion assessments show that both SF and PEG-coated probes are stiff enough to avoid the buckling effect during insertion in the cortex. However, with a buckling force of 300 mN and a mechanical holding in vitro of tens of minutes, we assess silk fibroin to be more reliable for practical handling. In vivo first try-outs in mouse brain showed neither buckling issues of the probe nor undesired alteration of the signal recording. Moreover, we evidenced two distinct time scales in the bioresorption of our polymer coatings: silk fibroin degrades itself in a matter of weeks and PEG dissolves itself within seconds in the presence of water. We then present a hybrid PEG and SF coating that could be used as a drug delivery system with different time scales to reduce both the acute and the chronic body reaction.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Learning to control a brain–machine interface for reaching and grasping by primates
Carmena, J. M., Lebedev, M. A., Crist, R. E., O'Doherty, J. E., Santucci, D. M., Dimitrov, D. F., Patil, P. G., Henriquez, C. S., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000042 · Cited by 1,761 · see citing works
Tien, L. W., Wu, F., Tang‐Schomer, M. D., Yoon, E., Omenetto, F. G., & Kaplan, D. L. (2013) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201203716 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review on mechanical considerations for chronically-implanted neural probes
Lecomte, A., Descamps, E., & Bergaud, C. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa8b4f · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Lecomte, A., Castagnola, V, Descamps, E., Dahan, L., Blatché, M. C., Dinis, T. M., Leclerc, E., Egles, C., & Bergaud, C.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- CNRS-LAAS
- Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (FR)
- Université de Technologie de Compiègne (FR)
- Université de Technologie de Compiègne
- Venue
- Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-10-19
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 125003
- ISSN
- 0960-1317 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6439
- OpenAlex
- W2243053580
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Institut des sciences de l'ingénierie et des systèmes
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
- Keywords
- silk, polyethylene glycol, brain implantation, local drug delivery, microprobe, biomaterials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review