The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole
Abstract
This paper begins with the “knowledge-ignorance paradox”—the process by which the growth of specialized knowledge results in a simultaneous increase in ignorance. It then outlines the roles of personal and social motivations, institutional decisions, the public culture, and technology in establishing consensual guidelines for ignorance. The upshot is a sociological model of how the “knowledge society” militates against the acquisition of scientific knowledge. Given the assumption of widespread scientific illiteracy, the paper tries to show why the ozone hole was capable of engendering some public understanding and concern, while climate change failed to do so. The ozone threat encouraged the acquisition of knowledge because it was allied and resonated with easy-to-understand bridging metaphors derived from the popular culture. It also engendered a “hot crisis.” That is, it provided a sense of immediate and concrete risk with everyday relevance. Climate change fails at both of these criteria and remains in a public limbo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2010) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/(issn)1540-6237 · Cited by 13,458
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
誠一, 市. (2004) · The Journal of AIDS Research · doi:10.11391/aidsr1999.6.104 · Cited by 3,221
Changing Highbrow Taste: From Snob to Omnivore
Peterson, R. A., & Kern, R. M. (1996) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2096460 · Cited by 2,418
Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know
Warnock, J., & Hirsch, E. D. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357649 · Cited by 2,309
The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model
Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228951 · Cited by 2,272
Theories of the Information Society
Webster, F. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315867854 · Cited by 1,284
The Economics of Global Warming (1992)
Cline, W. R. (2021) · World Scientific Encyclopedia of Climate Change · doi:10.1142/9789811213953_0001 · Cited by 1,073
The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas
McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01262.x · Cited by 1,002
Theories of the Information Society
Webster, P. F., & Webster, F. (1995) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203991367 · Cited by 925
Cited by
Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001 · Cited by 1,699
Testing Public (Un)Certainty of Science: Media Representations of Global Warming
Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/1075547004270234 · Cited by 432
Metadata
- Authors
- Ungar, S.
- Venue
- Public Understanding of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 297-312
- ISSN
- 0963-6625 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6609
- OpenAlex
- W2156568070
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 49
- FWCI
- 15.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306
- The paper
- Ungar, S. (2000). Knowledge, ignorance and the popular culture: climate change versus the ozone hole. Public Understanding of Science. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/3/306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.