Cited by 20Dielectric materials and actuatorsAdvanced Materials and MechanicsPolymer composites and self-healing

The durability of a conducting shape memory polyurethane actuator

Goo, Nam Seo, Paik, Il Hyun, Yoon, Kwang Joon·2007·Smart Materials and Structures

Abstract

This paper discusses the actuation durability of a conducting shape memory polyurethane (CSMPU) actuator. Introduced in 2004, the CSMPU actuator was manufactured by an in situ polymerization method for shape memory polyurethane with multi-walled carbon nanotubes. In order to apply the CSMPU to smart actuators and determine detailed design concepts, the durability data should be measured. Hence, the experiments in this research were designed to obtain durability data, and the maximum number of actuation cycles versus the initial elongation ratio and the actuation temperature were measured for the purpose of assessing durability. The broken surfaces of the specimens were investigated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0964-1726/16/4/n01

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For PCL-based SMPU containing MWCNTs, at 60% strain and 30 °C, a maximum of 420 cycles could be run.

    “For strains of 60%, a maximum of 420 cycles could be run at 30 °C, higher strains of 100% allowed 150 cycles to be run, whereas 120 cycles could be run at 60% strain and 40 °C.”
  • Higher actuation temperatures induce property degradation in PCL-based SMPU containing MWCNTs as a result of rapid movements of molecular chains.

    “The authors concluded that higher actuation temperatures induce property degradation as a result of the rapid movements of molecular chains.”
  • Specimen cycle life of PCL-based SMPU containing MWCNTs is dependent on deformation conditions (maximum strain and temperature).

    “They found that specimen cycle life was dependent on the deformation conditions (maximum strain and temperature).”
  • For PCL-based SMPU containing MWCNTs, at 60% strain and 40 °C, 120 cycles could be run.

    “For strains of 60%, a maximum of 420 cycles could be run at 30 °C, higher strains of 100% allowed 150 cycles to be run, whereas 120 cycles could be run at 60% strain and 40 °C.”
  • For PCL-based SMPU containing MWCNTs, at 100% strain, 150 cycles could be run.

    “For strains of 60%, a maximum of 420 cycles could be run at 30 °C, higher strains of 100% allowed 150 cycles to be run, whereas 120 cycles could be run at 60% strain and 40 °C.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goo, N. S., Paik, I. H., & Yoon, K. J.
Affiliations
Konkuk University (KR)
Venue
Smart Materials and Structures
Published
2007-07-20
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
N23-N26
ISSN
  • 0964-1726 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-665X
OpenAlex
W1987705404
Cited by
20
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Smart Materials and Structures (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Dielectric materials and actuators
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
shape memory polyurethane, multi-walled carbon nanotubes, actuator durability, in situ polymerization, smart actuators, fractography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review