The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Issues in mathematical modeling of piezoelectric energy harvesters
Open accessAbstract
The idea of vibration-to-electric energy conversion for powering small electronic components by using the ambient vibration energy has been investigated by researchers from different disciplines in the last decade. Among the possible transduction mechanisms, piezoelectric transduction has received the most attention for converting ambient vibrations to useful electrical energy. In the last five years, there have been a considerable number of publications using various models for the electromechanical behavior of piezoelectric energy harvester beams. The models used in the literature range from elementary single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) models to approximate distributed parameter models as well as analytical distributed parameter solution attempts. Because of the diverse nature of researchers working in energy harvesting (including electrical, mechanical and materials engineers), several oversimplified and incorrect physical assumptions have been propagated in the literature. Issues of the correct formulation for piezoelectric coupling, correct physical modeling, use of low fidelity models, incorrect base motion modeling, and the use of static expressions in a fundamentally dynamic problem are discussed and clarified here. These common indiscretions, which have been repeated in the existing piezoelectric energy harvesting literature, are addressed and clarified with improved models, and examples are provided. This paper aims to provide corrections and necessary clarifications for researchers from different engineering disciplines interested in electromechanical modeling of piezoelectric energy harvesters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Energy harvesting vibration sources for microsystems applications
Beeby, S. P., Tudor, M. J., & White, N. M. (2006) · Measurement Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/0957-0233/17/12/r01 · Cited by 3,008
Cited by
A review of piezoelectric energy harvesting based on vibration
Kim, H. S., Kim, J.-H., & Kim, J. (2011) · International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing · doi:10.1007/s12541-011-0151-3 · Cited by 1,121
Safaei, M., Sodano, H. A., & Anton, S. R. (2019) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/ab36e4 · Cited by 874
Piezoelectric Energy Harvesting Solutions
Caliò, R., Rongala, U., Camboni, D., Milazzo, M., Stefanini, C., De Petris, G., & Oddo, C. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s140304755 · Cited by 390
Vibration energy harvesting from random force and motion excitations
Tang, X., & Zuo, L. (2012) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/21/7/075025 · Cited by 72
EDLUND, C., & RAMAKRISHNAN, S. (2019) · European Journal of Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1017/s095679251800058x · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Erturk, A., & Inman, D. J.
- Venue
- Smart Materials and Structures
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-10-22
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 065016
- ISSN
- 0964-1726 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-665X
- OpenAlex
- W2003252765
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 59.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Issues in mathematical modeling of piezoelectric energy harvesters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0964-1726/17/6/065016
- The paper
- Erturk, A., & Inman, D. J. (2008). Issues in mathematical modeling of piezoelectric energy harvesters. Smart Materials and Structures. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/17/6/065016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.