The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validity of the Bruggeman relation for porous electrodes
Abstract
The ability to engineer electrode microstructures to increase power and energy densities is critical to the development of high-energy density lithium-ion batteries. Because high tortuosities in porous electrodes are linked to lower delivered energy and power densities, in this paper, we experimentally and computationally study tortuosity and consider possible approaches to decrease it. We investigate the effect of electrode processing on the tortuosity of in-house fabricated porous electrodes, using three-dimensionally reconstructed microstructures obtained by synchrotron x-ray tomography. Computer-generated electrodes are used to understand the experimental findings and assess the impact of particle size distribution and particle packing on tortuosity and reactive area density. We highlight the limitations and tradeoffs of reducing tortuosity and develop a practical set of guidelines for active material manufacture and electrode preparation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bruggeman, D. A. G. (1935) · Annalen der Physik · doi:10.1002/andp.19354160705 · Cited by 8,645
Simulation and Optimization of the Dual Lithium Ion Insertion Cell
Fuller, T. F., Doyle, M., & Newman, J. (1994) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.2054684 · Cited by 2,057
Porous electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries–how to prepare them and what makes them special
Vu, A., Qian, Y., & Stein, A. (2012) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201200320 · Cited by 719
Arora, P., Doyle, M., & White, R. E. (1999) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/1.1392512 · Cited by 586 · cited 1×
“Fundamentally, the theoretical description of the galvanostatic cycling process is summarized in terms of the well-established porous electrode theory [2–13].”
Background
Cited by
Tortuosity Determination of Battery Electrodes and Separators by Impedance Spectroscopy
Landesfeind, J., Hattendorff, J., Ehrl, A., Wall, W. A., & Gasteiger, H. A. (2016) · Journal of The Electrochemical Society · doi:10.1149/2.1141607jes · Cited by 731
Tjaden, B., Cooper, S. J., Brett, D. J., Kramer, D., & Shearing, P. R. (2016) · Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.coche.2016.02.006 · Cited by 532
High-performance battery electrodes via magnetic templating
Sander, J. S., Erb, R. M., Li, L., Gurijala, A., & Chiang, Y.-M. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.99 · Cited by 409
Tortuosity of porous media: Image analysis and physical simulation
Fu, J., Thomas, H. R., & Li, C. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103439 · Cited by 292
Bizeray, A. M., Zhao, S., Duncan, S. R., & Howey, D. A. (2015) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.07.019 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, D.-W., Ebner, M., Ely, D. R., Wood, V., & Edwin García, R.
- Venue
- Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2013-10-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 074009
- ISSN
- 0965-0393 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-651X
- OpenAlex
- W2080032753
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validity of the Bruggeman relation for porous electrodes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0965-0393/21/7/074009
- The paper
- Chung, D.-W., Ebner, M., Ely, D. R., Wood, V., & Edwin García, R. (2013). Validity of the Bruggeman relation for porous electrodes. Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/21/7/074009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
