The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fractal characterization of complexity in temporal physiological signals
Open accessAbstract
This review first gives an overview on the concept of fractal geometry with definitions and explanations of the most fundamental properties of fractal structures and processes like self-similarity, power law scaling relationship, scale invariance, scaling range and fractal dimensions. Having laid down the grounds of the basics in terminology and mathematical formalism, the authors systematically introduce the concept and methods of monofractal time series analysis. They argue that fractal time series analysis cannot be done in a conscious, reliable manner without having a model capable of capturing the essential features of physiological signals with regard to their fractal analysis. They advocate the use of a simple, yet adequate, dichotomous model of fractional Gaussian noise (fGn) and fractional Brownian motion (fBm). They demonstrate the importance of incorporating a step of signal classification according to the fGn/fBm model prior to fractal analysis by showing that missing out on signal class can result in completely meaningless fractal estimates. Limitation and precision of various fractal tools are thoroughly described and discussed using results of numerical experiments on ideal monofractal signals. Steps of a reliable fractal analysis are explained. Finally, the main applications of fractal time series analysis in biomedical research are reviewed and critically evaluated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fractal mechanisms and heart rate dynamics
Peng, C.-K., Havlin, S., Hausdorff, J. M., Mietus, J. E., Stanley, H. E., & Goldberger, A. L. (1995) · Journal of Electrocardiology · doi:10.1016/s0022-0736(95)80017-4 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Self-organization of cognitive performance.
Van Orden, G. C., Holden, J. G., & Turvey, M. T. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.331 · Cited by 718
Čukić, M., Stokić, M., Simić, S., & Pokrajac, D. (2020) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-020-09581-x · Cited by 130
Lunsford-Avery, J. R., Gonçalves, B. D. S. B., Brietzke, E., Bressan, R. A., Gadelha, A., Auerbach, R. P., & Mittal, V. A. (2017) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2017.01.051 · Cited by 89
Meerwijk, E. L., Ford, J. M., & Weiss, S. J. (2015) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.01.003 · Cited by 84
Executive functions and prefrontal cortex: a matter of persistence?
Ball, G., Stokes, P. R., Rhodes, R. A., Bose, S. K., Rezek, I., Wink, A.-M., Lord, L.-D., Mehta, M. A., Grasby, P. M., & Turkheimer, F. E. (2011) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2011.00003 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Eke, A., Herman, P., Kocsis, L., & Kozak, L. R.
- Venue
- Physiological Measurement
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2002-01-28
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R1-R38
- ISSN
- 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6579
- OpenAlex
- W2038689382
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fractal characterization of complexity in temporal physiological signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0967-3334/23/1/201
- The paper
- Eke, A., Herman, P., Kocsis, L., & Kozak, L. R. (2002). Fractal characterization of complexity in temporal physiological signals. Physiological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/23/1/201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.