Cited by 62Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Evaluation of blood pressure changes using vascular transit time

Open access
Foo, Jong Yong Abdiel, Lim, Chu Sing, Wang, Ping·2006·Physiological Measurement

Abstract

Imbalance of the human haemodynamic system can provide a prognosis of syncope, dizziness or hypertension. This can be assessed by monitoring its responses to postural change. Examining variations in blood pressure (BP) is deemed an effective means to identify symptoms of this associated condition. However, conventional methods do not promote prolonged monitoring due to the discomfort caused to patients. Established correlations between BP and pulse wave transmission have shown its usefulness in clinical applications. In this study, photoplethysmography and phonocardiography were used to estimate BP changes via observed variations in delay transmission or vascular transit time (VTT) at the upper limb. Thirty-one healthy adults (21 male) were recruited to perform three test activities, namely the arm held at heart level, fully raised up and held down. Association of the three BP indices and heart rate variations with transit time changes was then computed. The results showed that observed VTT changes were related to systolic BP (R(2) = 0.820; p < 0.05), diastolic BP (R(2) = 0.517; p < 0.05), mean arterial pressure (R(2) = 0.673; p < 0.05) and heart rate (R(2) = 0.000; p > 0.05). As systolic BP had the strongest correlation, a regression equation was formulated to associate the two parameters. The non-invasive measuring nature of VTT can be more accommodating to patients, especially during continual monitoring. Moreover, it has the added advantage that the pre-ejection period is not included in its time-related derivations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0967-3334/27/8/003

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FDA guidelines for RR monitors under 21 CFR 870.2375 do not specify accuracy requirements, but a 510(k) cleared bedside monitoring system (Siemens SC 6000) delivers a target accuracy of ±3 breaths per minute.

    “FDA guidelines for RR monitors under 21 CFR 870.2375 does not specify requirements in terms of accuracy28, but a 510(k) cleared bedside monitoring system (Siemens SC 6000) delivers a target accuracy of ± 3 breath per minute.”

    From Skin-interfaced biosensors for advanced wireless physiological monitoring in neonatal and pediatric intensive-care units (2020) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction and Experimental protocol discuss blood-pressure monitoring and the instruments used to measure it, not respiratory-rate monitor requirements. Searches for 21 CFR 870.2375, FDA accuracy requirements, Siemens SC 6000, and ±3 breaths per minute found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 62

Authors
Foo, J. Y. A., Lim, C. S., & Wang, P.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Venue
Physiological Measurement
Published
2006-05-26
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
685-694
ISSN
  • 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6579
OpenAlex
W2031137127
Cited by
62
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
blood pressure estimation, photoplethysmography, phonocardiography, postural changes, arm position, systolic blood pressure, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, hemodynamic monitoring, syncope, dizziness, hypertension
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Phonocardiography, Time, Photoplethysmography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review