The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a powerful tool for monitoring brain functional activities. Due to its non-invasive and non-restraining nature, fNIRS has found broad applications in brain functional studies. However, for fNIRS to work well, it is important to reduce its sensitivity to motion artifacts. We propose a new wavelet-based method for removing motion artifacts from fNIRS signals. The method relies on differences between artifacts and fNIRS signal in terms of duration and amplitude and is specifically designed for spike artifacts. We assume a gaussian distribution for the wavelet coefficients corresponding to the underlying hemodynamic signal in detail levels and identify the artifact coefficients using this distribution. An input parameter controls the intensity of artifact attenuation in trade-off with the level of distortion introduced in the signal. The method only modifies wavelet coefficients in levels adaptively selected based on the degree of contamination with motion artifact. To demonstrate the feasibility of the method, we tested it on experimental fNIRS data collected from three infant subjects. Normalized mean-square error and artifact energy attenuation were used as criteria for performance evaluation. The results show 18.29 and 16.42 dB attenuation in motion artifacts energy for 700 and 830 nm wavelength signals in a total of 29 motion events with no more than -16.7 dB distortion in terms of normalized mean-square error in the artifact-free regions of the signal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Herold, F., Wiegel, P., Scholkmann, F., & Müller, N. (2018) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm7120466 · Cited by 482
Cooper, R. J., Selb, J., Gagnon, L., Phillip, D., Schytz, H. W., Iversen, H. K., Ashina, M., & Boas, D. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00147 · Cited by 421
Autoregressive model based algorithm for correcting motion and serially correlated errors in fNIRS
Barker, J. W., Aarabi, A., & Huppert, T. J. (2013) · Biomedical Optics Express · doi:10.1364/boe.4.001366 · Cited by 337
A Review on the Use of Wearable Functional Near‐Infrared Spectroscopy in Naturalistic Environments
Pinti, P., Aichelburg, C., Gilbert, S., Hamilton, A., Hirsch, J., Burgess, P., & Tachtsidis, I. (2018) · Japanese Psychological Research · doi:10.1111/jpr.12206 · Cited by 325
Neural synchrony in mother-child conversation: Exploring the role of conversation patterns
Nguyen, T., Schleihauf, H., Kayhan, E., Matthes, D., Vrtička, P., & Hoehl, S. (2021) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaa079 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Molavi, B., & Dumont, G. A.
- Venue
- Physiological Measurement
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2012-01-25
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 259-270
- ISSN
- 0967-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1361-6579
- OpenAlex
- W2004995977
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/0967-3334/33/2/259
- The paper
- Molavi, B., & Dumont, G. A. (2012). Wavelet-based motion artifact removal for functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Physiological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/33/2/259
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.