Cited by 456Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesParticle physics theoretical and experimental studiesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The IR/UV connection in the non-commutative gauge theories

Open access
Matusis, Alec, Susskind, Leonard, Toumbas, Nicolaos·2000·Journal of High Energy Physics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2000/12/002

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Supersymmetry is currently the only known symmetry (other than Lorentz symmetry itself) that can protect Lorentz violating operators of dimension four or less.

    “Supersymmetry is currently the only known symmetry (other than Lorentz symmetry itself) that can protect Lorentz violating operators of dimension four or less [137, 159, 65], much as SUSY protects some lower dimension operators in non-commutative field theory [216].”

    From Modern Tests of Lorentz Invariance (2005) · cites this paper as [216]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, String theory and noncommutative geometry, J. High Energy Phys. 09 (1999) 032 [hep-th/9908142]. · arXiv
  2. S. Minwalla, M.V. Raamsdonk and N. Seiberg, Noncommutative perturbative dynam- ics, hep-th/9912072. · arXiv
  3. D. Bigatti and L. Susskind, Magnetic fields, branes and noncommutative geometry, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 066004 [hep-th/9908056]. · arXiv
  4. T. Krajewski and R. Wulkenhaar, Perturbative quantum gauge fields on the noncom- mutative torus, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 1011 [hep-th/9903187]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matusis, A., Susskind, L., & Toumbas, N.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2000-12-01
Volume
2000
Issue
12
Pages
002-002
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010610506
Cited by
455
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 20
FWCI
36.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (9870115)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
noncommutative gauge theory, noncommutative space, one-loop anomalies, supersymmetric gauge theories, renormalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review