Locally localized gravity
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The 2d JT model is described by a dynamical metric on the Planck brane.
“The 2d JT model is then described by a dynamical metric on the “Planck brane” (or Randall–Sundrum brane (Randall and Sundrum 1999; Karch and Randall 2001)).”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Karch and Randall 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)013 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry
Almheiri, A., Mahajan, R., Maldacena, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2020)149 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Lessons from the Information Paradox
Raju, S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.05770 · Cited by 234
Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity
Mertens, T. G., & Turiaci, G. J. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00046-1 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review
Kibe, T., Mandayam, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
“This is essentially the same as the setup in [143,144] where the dynamical boundary was called the Planck brane.”
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Unveiling horizons in quantum critical collapse
Tomašević, M., & Wu, C.-H. (2026) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2026)151 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Karch, A., & Randall, L.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2001-05-04
- Volume
- 2001
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 008-008
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2950107180
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 25.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy (FC02-94ER40818, DE‐FG02‐, DE-FC02-94 ER40818)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- localized gravity, brane cosmology, AdS5, linearized gravity, massive graviton, warped geometry, four-dimensional gravity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
