Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFT's on branes with boundaries

Karch, Andreas, Randall, Lisa·2001·Journal of High Energy Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/063

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. J. Maldacena, "The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity," Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231-252, hep-th/9711200. · arXiv
  2. A. Karch and L. Randall, "Locally localized gravity," hep-th/0011156. · arXiv
  3. N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati, and L. Randall, "Holography and Phenomenology," hep-th/0012148. · arXiv
  4. R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni, "Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model," hep-th/0012248. · arXiv
  5. C. Bachas and M. Petropoulos, "Anti-de-Sitter D-branes," hep-th/0012234. · arXiv
  6. E. Witten, "Solutions of four-dimensional field theories via M-theory," Nucl. Phys. B500 (1997) 3-42, hep-th/9703166. · arXiv
  7. A. Giveon, D. Kutasov, and N. Seiberg, "Comments on string theory on AdS(3)," Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 733-780, hep-th/9806194. · arXiv
  8. R. Gopakumar, J. Maldacena, S. Minwalla, and A. Strominger, "S-duality and noncommutative gauge theory," JHEP 06 (2000) 036, hep-th/0005048. · arXiv
  9. A. Hanany and E. Witten, "Type IIB superstrings, BPS monopoles, and three-dimensional gauge dynamics," Nucl. Phys. B492 (1997) 152-190, hep-th/9611230. · arXiv
  10. N. R. Constable, R. C. Myers, and O. Tafjord, "Non-Abelian brane intersections," hep-th/0102080. · arXiv
  11. D. Marolf and A. Peet, "Brane baldness vs. superselection sectors," Phys. Rev. D60 (1999) 105007, hep-th/9903213. · arXiv
  12. A. Fayyazuddin and D. J. Smith, "Localized intersections of M5-branes and four-dimensional superconformal field theories," JHEP 04 (1999) 030, hep-th/9902210. · arXiv
  13. A. Rajaraman, "Supergravity solutions for localised brane intersections," hep-th/0007241. · arXiv
  14. A. Karch and L. Randall, "Localized Gravity in String Theory," hep-th/0105108. · arXiv
  15. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, "An alternative to compactification," Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690-4693, hep-th/9906064. · arXiv
  16. A. Kapustin and S. Sethi, "The Higgs branch of impurity theories," Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 571-591, hep-th/9804027. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Karch, A., & Randall, L.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2001-06-27
Volume
2001
Issue
06
Pages
063-063
ISSN
1029-8479
Cited by
466
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review