Cited by 340Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 11 are not checked yet; none of the 16 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant

Open access
Dyson, Lisa, Kleban, Matthew, Susskind, Leonard·2002·Journal of High Energy Physics

Checked 2026-10-06 · 11 references not checked yet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2002/10/011

Cites

19 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 16 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 40 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 39
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 13
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 10
48 of 48
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The universe began with an inflationary phase and will end in an accelerated de Sitter phase.

    “Present cosmological evidence points to an inflationary beginning and an accelerated de Sitter end.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A final cosmological constant exists.

    “These assumptions-together with the existence of a final cosmological constant-imply that the universe is eternal but finite.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The usual connections between quantum statistical mechanics and thermodynamics hold.

    “In the following we will assume the usual connections between quantum statistical mechanics and thermodynamics.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is no universally accepted explanation for how the universe reached its exceptionally low-entropy initial state.

    “However, there is no universally accepted explanation of how the universe got into such a special state.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neither string theory nor quantum gravity currently provides a consistent account of the initial singularity or the low initial entropy.

    “Neither string theory nor quantum gravity provide a consistent starting point for a discussion of the initial singularity or why the entropy of the initial state is so low.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The late-time behavior of a universe with a cosmological constant is not well understood.

    “The late time features of a universe with a cosmological constant are also not well understood.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The holographic and horizon complementarity principles are valid assumptions for describing horizons.

    “under a set of assumptions motivated by the holographic and horizon complementarity principles”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The physics inside an observer's causal patch is exactly described by a dual quantum system with a Hamiltonian and a space of states, and the state is a thermal density matrix exp(−βH) at the appropriate temperature.

    “We assume that the physics within the causal patch is exactly described by a dual quantum system that includes a hamiltonian H and a space of quantum states.Furthermore the state of the world within the causal patch is density matrix exp (-βH) with the appropriate temperature.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The maximum entropy the system can ever have is the entropy of a de Sitter space whose size is set by the cosmological constant.

    “Furthermore we assume that the maximum entropy that the system can ever have is given by the entropy of a de Sitter space, whose size is determined by the cosmological constant.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is a fundamental cosmological constant.

    “• There is a fundamental cosmological constant.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The ideas of holography and complementarity can be applied to de Sitter space.

    “• We can apply the ideas of holography and complementarity to de Sitter space.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The time evolution operator is unitary, so phase-space area is conserved.

    “• The time evolution operator is unitary, so that phase space area is conserved.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The observer's proper time goes to infinity in the remote past and remote future, and the trajectory does not hit a singularity in finite proper time.

    “We have made the assumption that the proper time along the observer's trajectory goes to infinity in the remote past and the remote future; i.e., the trajectory does not encounter a singularity in finite proper time.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Horizon Complementarity is taken to mean that physics in the causal patch can be described as a closed or isolated system using conventional quantum mechanics.

    “For our present purposes, Horizon Complementarity will be taken to mean that physics in the causal patch can be described in terms of a closed or isolated system described by conventional quantum mechanics.”
14 of 14

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Covariant entropy bound points to the wrong reference

    Minor

    The cited entry [31] concerns the gravitational Hamiltonian. The reference list instead identifies [32] as the covariant entropy conjecture.

  • Both ring metrics are assigned to the inside region

    Minor

    The first metric is described as the solution outside the ring, but its stated range is r < r0. The metric explicitly described as inside the ring has the same range, leaving no stated range for the exterior solution.

  • Entropy formula has the opposite sign

    Minor

    For a normalized density matrix, Trρ log ρ is nonpositive. It therefore cannot equal the stated entropy, which is the logarithm of a number of effective states.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. A. Besicovitch, 1927, Mathematisk-Fysiske Meddelelser, 8

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 340

Metadata

Authors
Dyson, L., Kleban, M., & Susskind, L.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2002-10-02
Volume
2002
Issue
10
Pages
011-011
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141674504
Cited by
338
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
11.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9870115)
  • Mellam Family Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
cosmological constant, holographic principle, causal patch, cosmological evolution, spacetime structure, cosmological paradoxes, quantum gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review