The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beauty is Attractive: Moduli Trapping at Enhanced Symmetry Points
Open accessAbstract
We study quantum effects on moduli dynamics arising from the production of particles which are light at points of enhanced symmetry in moduli space. The resulting forces trap the moduli at these points. Moduli trapping occurs in time-dependent quantum field theory, as well as in systems of moving D-branes, where it leads the branes to combine into stacks. Trapping also occurs in the presence of gravity, though the range over which the moduli can roll is limited by Hubble friction. We observe that a scalar field trapped on a steep potential can induce a stage of acceleration of the universe, which we call trapped inflation. Moduli trapping ameliorates the cosmological moduli problem and may affect vacuum selection. In particular, rolling moduli are most powerfully attracted to the points of greatest symmetry. Given suitable assumptions about the dynamics of the very early universe, this effect might help to explain why among the plethora of possible vacuum states of string theory, we appear to live in one with a large number of (spontaneously broken) symmetries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
Quantum Fields in Curved Space
Birrell, N. D., & Davies, P. C. W. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511622632 · Cited by 8,354
The statistics of string/M theory vacua
Douglas, M. R. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/05/046 · Cited by 791
From the big bang theory to the theory of a stationary universe
Linde, A., Linde, D., & Mezhlumian, A. (1994) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.49.1783 · Cited by 542
Self-citation
Cited by
Douglas, M. R., & Kachru, S. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.733 · Cited by 1,122
DBI in the sky: Non-Gaussianity from inflation with a speed limit
Alishahiha, M., Silverstein, E., & Tong, D. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.123505 · Cited by 1,064
Self-citationMonodromy in the CMB: Gravity waves and string inflation
Silverstein, E., & Westphal, A. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.78.106003 · Cited by 724
Self-citationThings fall apart: topology change from winding tachyons
Adams, A., Liu, X., McGreevy, J., Saltman, A., & Silverstein, E. (2005) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2005/10/033 · Cited by 64
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kofman, L., Linde, A., Liu, X., Maloney, A., McAllister, L., & Silverstein, E.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2004-05-13
- Volume
- 2004
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 030-030
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133212638
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.