Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 10Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 17 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Bubbles unbound: bubbles of nothing without Kaluza-Klein

Open access
Copsey, Keith·2007·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

I present analytic time symmetric initial data for five dimensions describing ``bubbles of nothing'' which are asymptotically flat in the higher dimensional sense, i.e. there is no Kaluza-Klein circle asymptotically. The mass and size of these bubbles may be chosen arbitrarily and in particular the solutions contain bubbles of any size which are arbitrarily light. This suggests the solutions may be important phenomenologically and in particular I show that at low energy there are bubbles which expand outwards, suggesting a new possible instability in higher dimensions. Further, one may find bubbles of any size where the only region of high curvature is confined to an arbitrarily small volume.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper constructs analytic time-symmetric initial data for five-dimensional asymptotically flat “bubbles of nothing” that do not require an asymptotic Kaluza-Klein circle. It argues these bubbles can have arbitrary size and arbitrarily small mass, and that low-energy bubbles can initially expand, suggesting a possible new instability of higher-dimensional flat space.

Key findings

  • A two-parameter family of regular asymptotically flat solutions is found, with bubbles whose sizes and mass can be chosen arbitrarily; in particular, there are bubbles of any size that are arbitrarily light.
  • The ADM energy is positive definite and given by \(E = \frac{2\pi r_0^2}{G\omega}(\sqrt{1-\omega}+\sqrt{\omega}-1)\); for low energy, \(E \approx \frac{\pi r_0^2}{G\sqrt{\omega}}\).
  • The initial acceleration of the y-bubble area changes from contraction to expansion at \(\omega \approx 0.803815\), corresponding to \(r'_0/r_0 \approx 0.494032\) and \(E \approx 2.65366 r_0^2\); for the x-bubble the transition is at \(\omega \approx 0.196185\), \(r'_0/r_0 \approx 2.02416\), and \(E \approx 10.8726 r_0^2\).
  • For low-energy solutions, curvature is large only near the smaller bubble and small elsewhere; the maximum squared Riemann tensor is \(R^2 = \frac{24}{(1-\omega)^2 r_0^4} + O((1-\omega)^{-3/2}r_0^{-4})\), with the high-curvature region confined to a small proper volume.

Methods

  • Uses a time-symmetric initial-data ansatz with diagonal \(U(1)\times U(1)\) symmetry, solving the vacuum constraint to obtain a five-dimensional metric with parameters \(r_0\) and \(\omega\).
  • Analyzes asymptotics, computes ADM mass via a covariant boundary integral, and studies initial dynamics using Hamiltonian evolution equations in Gaussian coordinates.
  • Computes curvature via the Gauss-Codacci relation and evaluates the square of the Riemann tensor for low-energy solutions; no numerical evolution is performed.

Limitations

  • Stated: the full time evolution is not solved and must be addressed numerically; apparent horizons are technically difficult to find analytically; whether these bubbles represent a true instability remains open.
  • Stated: no instanton for quantum nucleation is found, and it is not shown that the bubbles are cobordant to flat space or admit a suitable spin structure.
  • Evident from the text: the expansion/contraction conclusions are based on initial data and physical argument, not on completed dynamical simulations; extensions to AdS, compactifications, and braneworlds are left as open questions.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/12/007

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 3 Not valid · 16 Not checked · 101 Own results and interpretations

67 more claims

Create a free account to see all 120 claims and to verify the 7 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 30
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 19
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1103/physrevd.74.066001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Copsey, K.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Copsey, Keith
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2007-12-04
Volume
2007
Issue
12
Pages
007-007
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034350077
Cited by
9
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Science Foundation (0555669)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
higher-dimensional spacetime, time-symmetric initial data, asymptotically flat solutions, bubble growth, analytical solution, five-dimensional gravity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.