Cited by 23Relativity and Gravitational TheoryBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations

Unit-lapse versions of the Kerr spacetime

Open access
Baines, Joshua, Berry, Thomas, Simpson, Alex, Visser, Matt·2021·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

The Kerr spacetime is perhaps the most astrophysically important of the currently known exact solutions to the Einstein field equations. Whenever spacetimes can be put in unit-lapse form it becomes possible to identify some very straightforward timelike geodesics, (the ‘rain’ geodesics), making the physical interpretation of these spacetimes particularly clean and elegant. The most well-known of these unit-lapse formulations is the Painlevé–Gullstrand form of the Schwarzschild spacetime, though there is also a Painlevé–Gullstrand form of the Lense–Thirring (slow rotation) spacetime. More radically there are also two known unit-lapse forms of the Kerr spacetime—the Doran and Natário metrics—though these are not precisely in Painlevé–Gullstrand form. Herein we shall seek to explicate the most general unit-lapse form of the Kerr spacetime. While at one level this is ‘merely’ a choice of coordinates, it is a strategically and tactically useful choice of coordinates, thereby making the technically challenging but astrophysically crucial Kerr spacetime somewhat easier to deal with. While in the current article we focus on the ‘rain’ geodesics, it should be noted that the explicit unit-lapse metrics we present are also useful for looking at other more complicated geodesics in the Kerr spacetime.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6382/abd071

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Kerr R 1965 Gravitational collapse and rotation Quasi-Stellar Sources and Gravitational Collapse: Including the Proc. of the First Texas Symp. on Relativistic Astrophysics (Austin, Texas 16-18 December 1963) ed I Robinson, A Schild and E L Schücking (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press) pp 99-102
  2. Wiltshire D L, Visser M and Scott S M 2009 The Kerr Spacetime: Rotating Black Holes in General Relativity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  3. Adler R J, Bazin M and Schiffer M 1975 Introduction to General Relativity 2nd edn (New York: McGraw-Hill) [It is important to acquire the 1975 second edition, the 1965 first edition does not contain any discussion of the Kerr spacetime.]
  4. D'Inverno R 1992 Introducing Einstein's Relativity (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
  5. Hartle J 2003 Gravity: An Introduction to Einstein's General Relativity (San Francisco: Addison- Wesley)
  6. Carroll S 2004 An Introduction to General Relativity: Spacetime and Geometry (San Francisco: Addison-Wesley)
  7. Wald R 1984 General Relativity (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press)
  8. Weinberg S 1972 Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity (Hoboken: Wiley)
  9. Hobson M P, Estathiou G P and Lasenby A N 2006 General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
  10. Baines J, Berry T, Simpson A and Visser M 2020 Painlevé-gullstrand form of the Lense-Thirring spacetime (arXiv:2006.14258[gr-qc]) · arXiv
  11. Novello M, Visser M and Volovik G 2002 Artificial Black Holes (Singapore: World Scientific)
  12. Schuster S and Visser M 2018 Boyer-Lindquist space-times and beyond: meta-material analogues (arXiv:1802.09807 [gr-qc]) · arXiv
  13. Bardeen J M 1968 Non-singular general-relativistic gravitational collapse Proc. of Int. Conf. GR5 (Tbilisi: USSR) p 174

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baines, J., Berry, T., Simpson, A., & Visser, M.
Affiliations
Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Corresponding author
  • Baines, Joshua
  • Berry, Thomas
  • Simpson, Alex
  • Visser, Matt
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2020-12-29
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
055001
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W3048182916
Cited by
23
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Marsden Fund, Royal Society of New Zealand
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Keywords
Kerr metric, Painlevé-Gullstrand coordinates, timelike geodesics, Schwarzschild metric, exact solutions of Einstein field equations, coordinate choice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review