The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Accelerating black hole thermodynamics with boost time
Abstract
We derive a thermodynamic first law for the electrically charged C-metric with vanishing cosmological constant. This spacetime describes a pair of identical accelerating black holes each pulled by a cosmic string. Treating the ‘boost time’ of this spacetime as the canonical time, we find a thermodynamic first law in which every term has an unambiguous physical meaning. We then show how this first law may be derived using Noetherian methods in the covariant phase space formalism. We argue that the area of the acceleration horizon contributes to the entropy and that the appropriate notion of energy of this spacetime is a ‘boost mass’ which vanishes identically. The recovery of the Reissner–Nordstrom first law in the limit of small string tension is also demonstrated. Finally, we compute the action of the Euclidean section of the C-metric and show it agrees with the thermodynamic grand potential, providing an independent confirmation of the validity of our first law. We also briefly speculate on the significance of firewalls in this spacetime.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A first law for the charged C-metric with vanishing cosmological constant was derived in [122] using covariant phase space methods, where 'boost time' was treated as canonical time.
“A first law for the charged C-metric with vanishing cosmological constant was derived in[122] using covariant phase space methods, where, moreover, 'boost time' was treated as canonical time.”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [122]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cool horizons for entangled black holes
Maldacena, J., & Susskind, L. (2013) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201300020 · Cited by 1,304
Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)013 · Cited by 910
The gravitational Hamiltonian, action, entropy and surface terms
Hawking, S. W., & Horowitz, G. T. (1996) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/6/017 · Cited by 704
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Kinnersley, 1970, Uniformly accelerating charged mass in general relativity, Phys. Rev. D, 2, 1359, 10.1103/physrevd.2.1359 · DOI
- Hawking, 1995, Pair production of black holes on cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, 3382, 10.1103/physrevlett.75.3382 · DOI
- Garfinkle, 1991, Semiclassical Wheeler wormhole production, Phys. Lett. B, 256, 146, 10.1016/0370-2693(91)90665-d · DOI
- Garfinkle, 1994, Entropy in black hole pair production, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 958, 10.1103/physrevd.49.958 · DOI
- Dowker, 1994, Pair creation of dilaton black holes, Phys. Rev. D, 49, 2909, 10.1103/physrevd.49.2909 · DOI
- Dowker, 1994, Pair creation of extremal black holes and Kaluza–Klein monopoles, Phys. Rev. D, 50, 2662, 10.1103/physrevd.50.2662 · DOI
- Hawking, 1995, Entropy, area, and black hole pairs, Phys. Rev. D, 51, 4302, 10.1103/physrevd.51.4302 · DOI
- Strominger, 2017, Superrotations and black hole pair creation, Class. Quantum Grav., 34, 10.1088/1361-6382/aa5b5f · DOI
- Ashtekar, 1981, On the existence of solutions to Einstein’s equation with non-zero Bondi news, Commun. Math. Phys., 79, 581, 10.1007/bf01209313 · DOI
- Appels, 2017, Black hole thermodynamics with conical defects, J. High Energy Phys., 10.1007/jhep05(2017)116 · DOI · Paper page
- Appels, 2016, Thermodynamics of accelerating black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett., 117, 10.1103/physrevlett.117.131303 · DOI · Paper page
- Anabalón, 2018, Holographic thermodynamics of accelerating black holes, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 10.1103/physrevd.98.104038 · DOI · Paper page
- Anabalón, 2019, Thermodynamics of charged, rotating, and accelerating black holes, J. High Energy Phys., 10.1007/jhep04(2019)096 · DOI
- Dutta, 2006, Boost mass and the mechanics of accelerated black holes, Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 335, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/2/005 · DOI
- Herdeiro, 2010, On the Bekenstein–Hawking area law for black objects with conical singularities, Phys. Rev. D, 81, 10.1103/physrevd.81.064013 · DOI
- Krtouš, 2020, Thermodynamics of two black holes, J. High Energy Phys., 10.1007/jhep02(2020)164 · DOI
- Astorino, 2016, CFT duals for accelerating black holes, Phys. Lett. B, 760, 393, 10.1016/j.physletb.2016.07.019 · DOI
- Astorino, 2016, Mass of Kerr–Newman black holes in an external magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D, 94, 10.1103/physrevd.94.024019 · DOI
- Astorino, 2017, Thermodynamics of regular accelerating black holes, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 10.1103/physrevd.95.064007 · DOI
- Kubiznak, 2017, Black hole chemistry: thermodynamics with lambda, Class. Quantum Grav., 34, 10.1088/1361-6382/aa5c69 · DOI
- Hong, 2003, A new form of the C-metric, Class. Quantum Grav., 20, 3269, 10.1088/0264-9381/20/14/321 · DOI · Paper page
- Griffiths, 2006, Interpreting the C-metric, Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 6745, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/23/008 · DOI
- Wald, 1993, Black hole entropy is the noether charge, Phys. Rev. D, 48, R3427, 10.1103/physrevd.48.r3427 · DOI · Paper page
- Gibbons, 1977, Action integrals and partition functions in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D, 15, 2752, 10.1103/physrevd.15.2752 · DOI · Paper page
- Hawking, 1995, Duality between electric and magnetic black holes, Phys. Rev. D, 52, 5865, 10.1103/physrevd.52.5865 · DOI
- Shankaranarayanan, 2003, Temperature and entropy of Schwarzschild–de Sitter space-time, Phys. Rev. D, 67, 10.1103/physrevd.67.084026 · DOI
- Pappas, 2017, Schwarzschild–de Sitter spacetime: the role of temperature in the emission of Hawking radiation, Phys. Lett. B, 775, 140, 10.1016/j.physletb.2017.10.058 · DOI
- Candelas, 1980, Vacuum polarization in Schwarzschild spacetime, Phys. Rev. D, 21, 2185, 10.1103/physrevd.21.2185 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Ball, A., & Miller, N.
- ORCID
- Ball, Adam
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2021-06-24
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 145031
- ISSN
- 0264-9381
- 1361-6382
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 3
- Licence
- Funders
- NSF Grant (1707938)
- NSF GRFP (DGE1745303)
- Fundamental Laws Initiative
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review