The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A new form of the C-metric
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the non-rotating case (a = 0) with Λ = 0, the factorized and non-factorized C-metrics are related by a coordinate transformation and thus physically equivalent.
“Note, however, in the non-rotating case (a = 0) with Λ = 0, the factorized and non-factorized C-metrics are related by a coordinate transformation are thus physically equivalent [339] (in the limit a = 0, n acts as a kinematical parameter).”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [339]
In 2003 and 2004 Hong and Teo found a way to express the C-metric in a factorized form, which simplified some calculations and showed the factorized version of the rotating C-metric is physically distinct from its original non-factorized form.
“In 2003 and 2004 Hong and Teo [339,340] found a way to express the C-metric in a factorized form, which not only simplified some calculations, but also showed the factorized version of the rotating C-metric is physically distinct from its original non-factorized form.”
From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [339]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- Kinnersley W, 1970, Phys. Rev., 2, 1359, 10.1103/PhysRevD.2.1359 · DOI
- Farhoosh H, 1980, Phys. Rev., 21, 317, 10.1103/PhysRevD.21.317 · DOI
- Bonnor W B, 1983, Gen. Rel. Grav., 15, 535, 10.1007/BF00759569 · DOI
- Bonnor W B, 1984, Gen. Rel. Grav., 16, 269, 10.1007/BF00762541 · DOI
- Plebanski J F, 1976, Ann. Phys., NY, 98, 98, 10.1016/0003-4916(76)90240-2 · DOI · Paper page
- Godfrey B B, 1972, Gen. Rel. Grav., 3, 3, 10.1007/BF00755917 · DOI
- Cornish F H J, 1995, Gen. Rel. Grav., 27, 439, 10.1007/BF02107940 · DOI
- Pravda V, 2000, Czech. J. Phys., 333, 10.1023/A:1022862309863 · DOI
- Dowker F, 1994, Phys. Rev., 49, 2909, 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2909 · DOI
- Emparan R, 1997, Nucl. Phys., 490, 365, 10.1016/S0550-3213(97)00119-3 · DOI
- Cornish F H J, 1995, Gen. Rel. Grav., 27, 735, 10.1007/BF02105320 · DOI
- Bicák J, 1999, Phys. Rev., 60, 044004, 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.044004 · DOI
- Emparan R, 2001, Nucl. Phys., 610, 190, 10.1016/S0550-3213(01)00319-4 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.101101 · DOI
- Dowker H F, 2003, Class. Quantum Grav., 20, 127, 10.1088/0264-9381/20/1/310 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.024006 · DOI
- Dias Ó J C, 2003, Phys. Rev., 67, 084018, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.084018 · DOI
- Dias Ó J C, 2003, Phys. Rev., 67, 064001, 10.1103/PhysRevD.67.064001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.64.064005 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer
Panella, E., Pedraza, J. F., & Svesko, A. (2024) · Universe · doi:10.3390/universe10090358 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, K., & Teo, E.
- Venue
- Classical and Quantum Gravity
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2003-07-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 3269-3277
- ISSN
- 0264-9381
- 1361-6382
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
