Cited by 204Artificial Intelligence in EducationAcademic integrity and plagiarismArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming AI revolution

Open access

Yeadon, Will, Inyang, Oto-Obong, Mizouri, Arin, Peach, Alex, Testrow, Craig P·2023·Physics Education

DOI 10.1088/1361-6552/acc5cf

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

The latest AI language modules can produce original, high quality full short-form (300-word) Physics essays within seconds. These technologies such as ChatGPT and davinci-003 are freely available to anyone with an internet connection. In this work, we present evidence of AI generated short-form essays achieving First-Class grades on an essay writing assessment from an accredited, current university Physics module. The assessment requires students answer five open-ended questions with a short, 300-word essay each. Fifty AI answers were generated to create ten submissions that were independently marked by five separate markers. The AI generated submissions achieved an average mark of 71 ± 2 % , in strong agreement with the current module average of 71 ± 5 % . A typical AI submission would therefore most-likely be awarded a First Class, the highest classification available at UK universities. Plagiarism detection software returned a plagiarism score between 2 ± 1 % (Grammarly) and 7 ± 2 % (TurnitIn). We argue that these results indicate that current natural language processing AI represent a significant threat to the fidelity of short-form essays as an assessment method in Physics courses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6552/acc5cf

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Massive open online course completion rates revisited: Assessment, length and attrition
Jordan, K. (2015) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i3.2112 · Cited by 510
Why hasn’t technology disrupted academics’ teaching practices? Understanding resistance to change through the lens of activity theory
Blin, F., & Munro, M. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.017 · Cited by 489
Artificial intelligence versus Maya Angelou: Experimental evidence that people cannot differentiate AI-generated from human-written poetry
Köbis, N., & Mossink, L. D. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106553 · Cited by 406
All That’s ‘Human’ Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Text
Clark, E., August, T., Serrano, S., Haduong, N., Gururangan, S., & Smith, N. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.565 · Cited by 290
All That's 'Human' Is Not Gold: Evaluating Human Evaluation of Generated Text
Clark, E., August, T., Serrano, S., Haduong, N., Gururangan, S., & Smith, N. A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.00061 · Cited by 290
State-of-the-art automated essay scoring: Competition, results, and future directions from a United States demonstration
Shermis, M. D. (2014) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.04.001 · Cited by 227
How to cheat on your final paper: Assigning AI for student writing
Fyfe, P. (2023) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01397-z · Cited by 205
Automated Essay Writing: An AIED Opinion
Sharples, M. (2022) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-022-00300-7 · Cited by 198
MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence FrontiersPreprint
Pillutla, K., Swayamdipta, S., Zellers, R., Thickstun, J., Welleck, S., Choi, Y., & Harchaoui, Z. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.01454 · Cited by 128

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 13 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 204

Integrating AI Technology Into Language Teacher Education: Challenges, Potentials, and Assumptions
Case, R. E., Liu, L., & Mintz, J. (2025) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2025.2458950 · Cited by 10
Assessing the Intellectual Structure of the Evolving Knowledge Base on ChatGPT in the Field of Education and Health
Demirkol, M., & Malkoç, N. (2023) · Educational Process International Journal · doi:10.22521/edupij.2023.124.3 · Cited by 10
A Systematic Review of Academic Integrity and Misconduct with Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education
Memarian, B., & Doleck, T. (2025) · SN Computer Science · doi:10.1007/s42979-025-04569-y · Cited by 18
Changing assessment landscape in management education with AI-driven technologies: impacts and drivers
Henadirage, A., Chathuranga, B. T. K., & Gunarathne, N. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-026-00578-w · Cited by 9
The Application of ChatGPT in Language Test Design – The What and How
Nguyễn, T. P. T. (2023) · Proceedings of the AsiaCALL International Conference · doi:10.54855/paic.2348 · Cited by 10
The Ethics of Using Artificial Intelligence in Qualitative ResearchPreprint
Marshall, D. T., & Naff, D. (2023) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/3rnbh · Cited by 9
AI detecting AI in academic writing: Why most AI detector findings are false
Tsigaris, P., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2026) · Next Research · doi:10.1016/j.nexres.2026.101396 · Cited by 11
Incorporating ChatGPT as an automated written corrective feedback tool into L2 writing class
Zhang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Language Teaching · doi:10.54475/jlt.2024.024 · Cited by 13
GPT-4 shows comparable performance to human examiners in ranking open-text answers
Zubaer, A. A., Granitzer, M., Geschwind, S., Lambsdorff, J. G., & Voss, D. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-21572-8 · Cited by 12
Design Implications for Next Generation Chatbots with Education 5.0
Sedrakyan, G., Borsci, S., van den Berg, S. M., van Hillegersberg, J., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2024) · Lecture notes in educational technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-3883-0_1 · Cited by 8
A Catalog of Generative AI Tools for Faculty Advancement
Ahmed, K. (2024) · International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) · doi:10.1109/ithet61869.2024.10837663 · Cited by 7
Evaluating human ability to distinguish between ChatGPT-generated and original scientific abstracts
Nabata, K. J., AlShehri, Y., Mashat, A. A., & Wiseman, S. M. (2025) · Updates in Surgery · doi:10.1007/s13304-025-02106-3 · Cited by 8
El uso de inteligencia artificial y sus desafíos para la evaluación académica: una revisión de la literatura
VanderLinde, G., & Cury, T. M. (2024) · Cuaderno de Pedagogía Universitaria · doi:10.29197/cpu.v21i41.564 · Cited by 16
Strengthening Cyber Security Education: Designing Robust Assessments for ChatGPT-Generated Answers
Plapp, A., Wu, J., Pan, L., Chen, C., Chua, C., & Zhang, J. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2458-1_2 · Cited by 7
Detection of artificial intelligence-generated essays for academic assessment integrity using large language models
Qorich, M., & El Ouazzani, R. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128405 · Cited by 6
David vs. Goliath: comparing conventional machine learning and a large language model for assessing students' concept use in a physics problem
Kieser, F., Tschisgale, P., Rauh, S., Bai, X., Maus, H., Petersen, S., Stede, M., Neumann, K., & Wulff, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2024.1408817 · Cited by 11
Exploring the Role of ChatGPT in Science Education for Asia-Pacific and Beyond: a Systematic Review
Park, H. K., & Martin, S. N. (2024) · Asia-Pacific Science Education · doi:10.1163/23641177-bja10079 · Cited by 9
Identifying Text Classification Failures in Multilingual AI-Generated Content
Subramaniam, R. (2023) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence & Applications · doi:10.5121/ijaia.2023.14505 · Cited by 7
Reframing Assessments
Matheis, P., & Jacob-John, J. (2024) · Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-0240-8.ch008 · Cited by 7
The Robustness of AI-Classifiers in the Face of AI-Assisted Plagiarism: The Case of Turnitin AI Content Detector
Ibrahim, K. H. S., Al Otaibi, D., & Sibai, F. N. (2025) · International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.4018/ijcallt.375428 · Cited by 5
What Does YouTube Advise Students About Bypassing AI-Text Detection Tools? A Pragmatic Analysis
Foltýnek, T., & Newton, P. M. (2025) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-025-09675-3 · Cited by 5
To Study the Impact of Chatgpt Tool on Academic Learning: Perspective of Students and Teachers in Higher Education
Dr. Shweta Batra, D. S. V. (2023) · Journal of Informatics Education and Research · doi:10.52783/jier.v3i2.340 · Cited by 6
Designing Politics and IR Assessments in the Era of AI: An Empirical Investigation into ChatGPT’s Output Across Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy
Dilling, M., & Owen, L. (2024) · Journal of Political Science Education · doi:10.1080/15512169.2024.2408767 · Cited by 6
Deep Learning Strategies for Identifying Machine-Generated Text
Yadagiri, A., & Pakray, P. (2025) · International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) · doi:10.1109/imcom64595.2025.10857545 · Cited by 5
ЗАСТОСУВАННЯ CHATGPT У НАВЧАННІ ФІЗИКИ БАКАЛАВРІВ ТЕХНІЧНОГО УНІВЕРСИТЕТУ
Подласов, С. О., & Матвійчук, О. В. (2023) · Information Technologies and Learning Tools · doi:10.33407/itlt.v97i5.5374 · Cited by 12
Exploring Vietnamese students’ plagiarism awareness and actual practices through using of ChatGPT as a learning tool
Tran, K. V., Le, M. T. T., & Pham, A. T. (2025) · International Journal for Educational Integrity · doi:10.1007/s40979-025-00207-5 · Cited by 8
Educational Innovation in the Information Age
Mrabet, J., Studholme, R., & Thompson, N. L. (2024) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3096-8.ch013 · Cited by 4
GAI Versus Teacher Scoring: Which is Better for Assessing Student Performance?
Li, X. R., Zappatore, M. S., Li, T., Zhang, W., Tao, S., Wei, X., Zhou, X., Guan, N., & Chan, A. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2025.3572518 · Cited by 5
Impact of AI on Student’s Research and Writing Projects
Rosselló, J. (2023) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3734-9_57 · Cited by 6
A Comparison of AI Performance with Student Performance in Astrophysics and Astrobiology
Radenković, L., & Milošević, M. (2024) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/5.0168896 · Cited by 4
Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Yazılı Üretimlerinin OpenAI GPT ile Değerlendirilmesi
SAYIN, A., & Melanlıoğlu, D. (2024) · Yuksekogretim Dergisi · doi:10.53478/yuksekogretim.1418870 · Cited by 3
Enhancing EFL argumentative writing through an AI-powered corpus: impact on learner writing proficiency
Zhu, L., Su, Y., Xu, S., & Liu, K. (2025) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2025.2599152 · Cited by 4
Harnessing Computational Intelligence for Educational Transformation
Reddy, C. K. K., Chintalapalli, A., & Nag, A. (2024) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-8151-9.ch006 · Cited by 3
Künstliche Intelligenz in den Naturwissenschaftsdidaktiken – gekommen, um zu bleiben: Potenziale, Desiderata, Herausforderungen
Nehring, A., Buschhüter, D., Kubsch, M., Ludwig, T., Wulff, P., & Neumann, K. (2025) · Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/s40573-025-00177-8 · Cited by 3
Applying Ethics in AI-Based Research
Hashem, T. N., Ahmad, A., Kumar, A., & Alotoum, F. J. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0340-6.ch012 · Cited by 3
Artificial Intelligence: New Challenges and Opportunities in Physics Education
Wink, R., & Bonivento, W. M. (2023) · Challenges in physics education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37387-9_27 · Cited by 3
Exploring the Profile of University Assessments Flagged as Containing AI-Generated Material
Gooch, D., Waugh, K., Richards, M., Slaymaker, M., & Woodthorpe, J. (2024) · ACM Inroads · doi:10.1145/3656478 · Cited by 3
Generative Artificial Intelligence and Education
Palmer, E., & Barbieri, W. (2025) · Springer briefs in education · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-1595-7_9 · Cited by 3
Leveraging systematic review practice for research skill development in an undergraduate science course: A case study
MacDonald, H., & Bézaire, V. (2024) · Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00171.2023 · Cited by 3
Undergraduate Students' Conceptions of Academic Writing at the Intersection of English Medium Instruction and the Digital Age
Hadizadeh, A., & Kanık, M. (2025) · European Journal of Education · doi:10.1111/ejed.70162 · Cited by 12
A Framework for Assessment Design in the Era of Generative AI: Case Study of Take-Home Assignment in Software-related Courses
Felipe, A. L., Khwakhali, U. S., & Nguyen, T. N. (2025) · International STEM Education Conference (iSTEM-Ed) · doi:10.1109/istem-ed65612.2025.11129352 · Cited by 2
The recent history of large language model in investment and portfolio management: is it a revolution in finance?
Malaquias, R. F., & Hwang, Y. (2025) · Journal of Management History · doi:10.1108/jmh-01-2025-0008 · Cited by 2
Unlocking the Future: A Comprehensive Review of ChatGPT in Education
Kim, D., Wang, C. K., Borowiec, K., Rein, N., Cho, J.-H. A., & Liu, J. J. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-025-09923-w · Cited by 2
The Emerging Role of AI and Social Robots in University Student Recruitment
Hair, J. F., Rana, S., Robb, D., & Stroud, M. (2025) · Digital education and learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-03977-4_7 · Cited by 2
Research on Revolutionising Learning with AI-Powered Chatbots and NLP Techniques
Rathod, K. (2024) · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.55041/ijsrem31253 · Cited by 2
Exploring the Role of AI in Learning and Teaching Thermodynamics: A Case Study with ChatGPT
Oss, S. (2024) · The Physics Educator · doi:10.1142/s2661339524500136 · Cited by 2
The Emergency of Chatbots and Student Learning Dilemma: A Comprehensive Review
Mudhombo, I. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-69954-2_10 · Cited by 2
ChatGPT as a Learning Aid for an Introductory Programming Course
Vahlois, I. B. D., Ong, M. A. S., Llagas, B. F. T., Cruz, R. G. L. D., & Chu, S. B. (2024) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73538-7_14 · Cited by 2
Perceptions of Educators on the Use of Text-Generative AI in South African Higher Education
Coleman, M., & Belle, J.-P. V. (2025) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9045-6_4 · Cited by 3
Using Large Language Models to Analyze Interviews for Driver Psychological Assessment: A Performance Comparison of ChatGPT and Google-Gemini
Sun, R., Hu, X., Shao, Y., Luo, Z., Liu, B., & Cheng, Y. (2025) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym17101713 · Cited by 3
CHATGPT UNTUK MENDUKUNG PENCARIAN TOPIK SKRIPSI DI FAKULTAS TEKNIK UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MEDAN
Waluyo, B. D., Astrid, E., Mulyana, D. I., & Pakpahan, B. M. T. (2023) · JURNAL TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI & KOMUNIKASI DALAM PENDIDIKAN · doi:10.24114/jtikp.v10i1.46478 · Cited by 3
Artificial intelligence at school: please handle with care
Oss, S. (2023) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/acd7c0 · Cited by 2
Chat GPT sebagai Era Baru dalam Transformasi Pembelajaran: Systematic Literature Review
Kusworo, K., Goreta, G., Hanafi, I., Susanto, T. T. D., & Astuti, I. A. D. (2024) · SAP (Susunan Artikel Pendidikan) · doi:10.30998/sap.v8i3.17991 · Cited by 7
ChatGPT vs Bard: Which is a Better Writer?
Ng, A. L., & Ong, J. (2024) · IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) · doi:10.1109/cai59869.2024.00066 · Cited by 3
ChatGPT in Assessing Writing
Aryadoust, V., & Jia, Y. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-51447-0_201-1 · Cited by 2
AI Detection Tools: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence and Their Implications for Education
CANER, H. N. (2025) · Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.5782/2223-2621.1580 · Cited by 2
Style, sentiment, and quality of undergraduate writing in the AI era: A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of 4,820 authentic empirical reports
Mak, M. H. C., & Walasek, L. (2025) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100507 · Cited by 10
The Outcomes of the Learning Curve for a Concept in Physics Education
Kotsis, K. Τ. (2023) · European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning · doi:10.59324/ejceel.2023.1(3).05 · Cited by 1
Investigating the threat of AI to undergraduate medical school admissions: a study of its potential impact on the rating of applicant essays
Choi, J., Zhao, J., Ngo, T.-A., & Grierson, L. (2025) · Canadian Medical Education Journal · doi:10.36834/cmej.79690 · Cited by 2
The Impact of Chatgpt on English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Writing Skills-An Experimental Study at Georgian Universities
Pipia, E., & Gurgenishvili, T. (2025) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · doi:10.19044/esj.2025.v21n10p190 · Cited by 3
Do AI-generated videos obey physics laws?
Gregorcic, B. (2025) · Physics Education · doi:10.1088/1361-6552/adfc1c · Cited by 1
AI Meets Academia: the Impact of ChatGPT on Transforming Assessment Design in UK Universities
Gonzo, F. C., Hamatui, N., Mukesi, M., & Gonzo, M. (2025) · Perspectives on Global Development and Technology · doi:10.1163/15691497-12341718 · Cited by 1
AI-generated language in introductory physics lab reports in the first year of ChatGPT
Arvidsson, K. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00742-7 · Cited by 1
Detecting AI-generated essays using fine-tuned XLNet-CNN hybrid techniques: a study of the academic integrity challenge
Prajapati, M., Baliarsingh, S. K., & Dev, P. P. (2026) · International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/s13042-025-02880-x · Cited by 2
Using AI to control AI-assisted plagiarism in L2 writing: a critical review of the literature
Ibrahim, K. H. S. (2026) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-026-00433-9 · Cited by 1
Navigating GenAI in Psychology Education: Assessment Validity, Academic Integrity, and the Realities of Teaching in an AI-Rich Era
Delvenne, J. (2026) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/14757257261427151 · Cited by 1
Stylometric detection of AI-generated texts: evidence from human and machine-written essays
Chen, R., Xiong, S., He, J., & Ross, G. J. (2026) · Digital Scholarship in the Humanities · doi:10.1093/llc/fqag064 · Cited by 1
Beyond AI Detection: A Pilot Study of IntegreviseTM and Viva-Based Verification of Student Understanding in AI-Mediated Assessment
Hutson, J., Poyer, K., Ogoe, E., & Atologun, K. A. (2026) · Trends in Higher Education · doi:10.3390/higheredu5030059 · Cited by 1
Türkiye’de ChatGPT algısı: Bert modeli ile duygu analizi
GAZAZ, D. C., & Ayvaz, S. (2024) · Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi · doi:10.31795/baunsobed.1470846 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: The Effectiveness of ChatGPT from the Perspective of Islamic University Students in Kushtia, Bangladesh.
Hossain, S., Islam, S., Taskin, T., Hossain, S., & Gain, N. (2025) · International Social Sciences and Education Journal · doi:10.61424/issej.v3i2.264 · Cited by 3
Going beyond by using AI in an introductory physics course
Linde, A. J. P., & Cardenas, R. E. (2025) · European Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6404/adeb15 · Cited by 5
Douyin Platform’s Short-Video Content Homogenization: An Analysis of Innovation Dilemmas Based on Coordination Games
Tang, Y. (2025) · Highlights in Business Economics and Management · doi:10.54097/3514aj67 · Cited by 1
Advancing Education through AI: The Role of ChatGPT as Virtual Tutors in the Future of Learning
Graefen, B., & Fazal, N. (2023) · Annals of Pharmacy Education Safety and Public Health Advocacy · doi:10.51847/luftksf1zo · Cited by 1
Examining Accuracy Heterogeneities in Classification of Multilingual
Subramaniam, R. (2023) · doi:10.5121/csit.2023.131221
Volume 44 Number 3
(2023) · Microbiology Australia · doi:10.1071/mav44n3 · Cited by 1
Analysis of the Impact of ChatGPT Usage in Direct Current Physics Material on Enhancing Students' Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) during the Merdeka Belajar
Farizi, Z. A., Sahlan, S., Prasetyo, E., Fitriani, N., Laleng, E. M., Tiar, H. H., & Anwar, Z. (2024) · Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika · doi:10.20527/bipf.v12i1.17603
Developing and evaluating an approach to individualized, automated, process-focused feedback for university writing instruction
Speltz, E. D. (2023) · doi:10.31274/td-20240617-213
Assessment Design Before and After the Emergence of Generative AI
Tran, Q. N., Ngoc, T. N., Pham, T., Felipe, A., Huynh, T., & Tran, Q. N. (2024) · Lecture notes in mechanical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-59042-9_12 · Cited by 1
ChatGPT-Produced Content as a Resource in the Language Education Classroom: A Guiding Hand
Case, R. E., & Liu, L. (2024) · Computers in The Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2024.2442700 · Cited by 1
ChatGPT as an Automated Essay Scoring System in Comparison With Human Raters in Malaysia
Jal, M. A., Kew, S. N., & Bunari, G. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9062-7.ch012
Tendenciák a pedagógiai innovációk eredménytelensége mögött
Urbán, P. (2025) · Iskolakultúra · doi:10.14232/iskkult.2025.2.83
Perbandingan Kapabilitas Respons Chatgpt Dan Gemini Terhadap Pertanyaan Konseptual Tentang Optik
Azizah, M. A., & Mansyur, J. (2025) · JPFT (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako Online) · doi:10.22487/jpft.v12i1.3510 · Cited by 3
Surveillance and Guidance: An Academic Integrity Crossway for Humans Using Generative AI
Dumouchel, G., & Peters, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-92534-4_7
Integrating Generative Artificial Intelligence in Learning Analytics: Insights and Implications From Recent Studies
Wong, B. T. M., Li, K. C., & Chau, C. S. Y. (2025) · International Symposium on Educational Technology · doi:10.1109/iset65607.2025.00018
Evaluating the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Designing Lesson Plans for Teaching Ideological and Political Education Among Chinese Pre-Service Teachers
Xu, X. (2025) · Journal of Education Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.54097/2atvp377
Students’ Use of ChatGPT in an Algebra Class: A Case Study of Prompts and Attitudes
Braskén, M., Berts, K.-E., Wallin, S., & Frilund, S. (2025) · LUMAT International Journal on Math Science and Technology Education · doi:10.31129/lumat.13.1.2877
Additional file 1 of The great detectives: humans versus AI detectors in catching large language model-generated medical writing
Liu, J. Q., Hui, K. T., Zoubi, F. A., Zhou, Z. Z. X., Samartzis, D., Yu, C. C. H., Chang, J. R., & Wong, A. Y. L. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.25857523
I spy AI – Leveraging rater experience into reliable identification of AI-generated texts in specific writing assessment contextsPreprint
Dobrić, N., & Lailiyah, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5531958
ODBORNÁ ESEJ A JEJ IMPLEMENTÁCIA DO VYUČOVANIA BIOLÓGIE NA ZÁKLADNEJ ŠKOLE
Šmida, D., Huszárová, K., Čipková, E., & Tomková, R. (2026) · Biologie Chemie Zeměpis · doi:10.14712/25337556.2025.3.3
The Integrity of Psychology Assessments in the AI Age: A Critical Examination
Ivory, M. R., Finnerty, S., Dunn, K., Philpot, R., & Warmelink, L. (2026) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-026-09729-0
How Has ChatGPT Been Positioned as a Threat to Academic Integrity? A Scoping Review
Liu, Q., Gladman, T., Gallagher, S., & Hu, A. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-1875-3_3 · Cited by 2
genAI and Professional Learning
Ulbrick, R., & Pechenkina, E. (2026) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3638-1.ch010
Capability of ChatGPT and Gemini in solving optics problem
Azizah, M. A., Werdhiana, I. K., Kaharu, S. N., & Mansyur, J. (2026) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0328898
Feedback indices to evaluate LLM responses to rebuttals for multiple choice type questions
Dunlap, J. C., Parent, A., & Widenhorn, R. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-01521-8 · Cited by 1
The Janus-Faced Nature of AI in STEM Education
Wulff, P. (2026) · Maarif global education series · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-9023-0_4
Üretken Yapay Zekâ ve İktisat Eğitimi: Bizi Ne Bekliyor?
Yolusever, A. (2026) · Iğdır Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi · doi:10.58618/igdiriibf.1946886
Changing Trends in Evaluation Techniques in Education Due to Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review
Maini, E., Kumar, S. A., Marwaha, D., & Maini, B. (2026) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-9101-5_41
Navigating academic integrity in the age of on-demand artificial intelligence: implications for globalizing higher education at the University of Ibadan
Ojedeji, S. O. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1862601
Stylistic Error Analysis and Written Composition Performance Among Grade 12 Students: Basis for an Integrated Writing Enhancement Program
Carial, G. M., & Amada, A. T. (2026) · Psychology and Education A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.70838/pemj.600708
Generative AI in Higher Education: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
Berghel, H., Berleant, D., & Berghel, H. (2026) · Computer · doi:10.1109/mc.2026.3705552 · Cited by 1

Authors: Yeadon, W., Inyang, O.-O., Mizouri, A., Peach, A., & Testrow, C. P.
Affiliations: Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author: Yeadon, Will
ORCID: Yeadon, Will
Inyang, Oto-Obong
Mizouri, Arin
Testrow, Craig P
Venue: Physics Education
Publisher: IOP Publishing
Published: 2023-04-05
Volume: 58
Issue: 3
Pages: 035027
ISSN: 0031-9120 (ISSN-L)
1361-6552
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6552/acc5cf
OpenAlex: W4362551436
Cited by: 199
References: 13
Citations by year: 2026: 23 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 54
FWCI: 46.70
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: hybrid
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (vor)
iopscience.iop.org/info/page/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
Locations: Physics Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics: Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords: AI-generated text, ChatGPT, physics assessment, plagiarism detection, academic integrity, natural language processing, university physics education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The death of the short-form physics essay in the coming AI revolution

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks