Cited by 661Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 214 of the 214 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep learning in medical image registration: a review

Open access
Fu, Yabo, Lei, Yang, Wang, Tonghe, Curran, Walter J, Liu, Tian, Yang, Xiaofeng·2020·Physics in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

This paper presents a review of deep learning (DL)-based medical image registration methods. We summarized the latest developments and applications of DL-based registration methods in the medical field. These methods were classified into seven categories according to their methods, functions and popularity. A detailed review of each category was presented, highlighting important contributions and identifying specific challenges. A short assessment was presented following the detailed review of each category to summarize its achievements and future potential. We provided a comprehensive comparison among DL-based methods for lung and brain registration using benchmark datasets. Lastly, we analyzed the statistics of all the cited works from various aspects, revealing the popularity and future trend of DL-based medical image registration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6560/ab843e

Cites

214 of 214 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–214 of 214

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 661

Metadata

Authors
Fu, Y., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lei, Yang
  • Yang, Xiaofeng
Venue
Physics in Medicine & Biology
Published
2020-10-07
Volume
65
Issue
20
Pages
20TR01
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W3013056581
Cited by
661
References
214
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 132 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 22
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (R01CA215718)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
medical image registration, deep learning, brain registration, benchmark dataset, research trends
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Brain, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review