A review of deep learning-based deformable medical image registration
Open accessAbstract
The alignment of images through deformable image registration is vital to clinical applications (e.g., atlas creation, image fusion, and tumor targeting in image-guided navigation systems) and is still a challenging problem. Recent progress in the field of deep learning has significantly advanced the performance of medical image registration. In this review, we present a comprehensive survey on deep learning-based deformable medical image registration methods. These methods are classified into five categories: Deep Iterative Methods, Supervised Methods, Unsupervised Methods, Weakly Supervised Methods, and Latest Methods. A detailed review of each category is provided with discussions about contributions, tasks, and inadequacies. We also provide statistical analysis for the selected papers from the point of view of image modality, the region of interest (ROI), evaluation metrics, and method categories. In addition, we summarize 33 publicly available datasets that are used for benchmarking the registration algorithms. Finally, the remaining challenges, future directions, and potential trends are discussed in our review.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review surveys deep learning-based deformable medical image registration, classifying methods into deep iterative, supervised, unsupervised, weakly supervised, and latest techniques, based on 91 selected studies. It summarizes public datasets and reports trends in modalities, ROIs, evaluation metrics, and method categories, while outlining remaining challenges.
Key findings
- The review classifies deep learning-based deformable registration into five categories: Deep Iterative Methods, Supervised Methods, Unsupervised Methods, Weakly Supervised Methods, and Latest Methods; the Methods section describes four categories by evolution and treats latest techniques separately.
- Among 91 selected studies, MR-MR and CT-CT were the most common modalities at 50% and 30%; the top ROIs were brain (47%), lung (19%), and prostate (14%); DSC was the most popular evaluation metric at 46%; unsupervised and supervised methods accounted for 31% and 22%, respectively.
- The review summarizes public datasets for benchmarking: the abstract states 33 publicly available datasets, while the Datasets section says “Our review summarized 30 public datasets from deep learning registration studies in Table 1,” mostly brain MR and lung CT, with examples including ADNI, COPDGene, OAI, and PROMISE12.
- Approximate backbone parameters reported are GAN 11M, CNN 14M, U-Net 19M, MLP 15M, and Transformer 46M; future directions include diffeomorphic registration, registration efficiency, large deformation of soft tissues, and registration constraints.
Methods
- Design: narrative review of deep learning-based deformable medical image registration, including statistical analysis of selected papers and tables of methods and datasets.
- Data/sample: 91 studies were included after searching keywords such as “deep learning,” “medical image registration,” “supervised,” “unsupervised,” “motion estimation,” “GAN,” “deep similarity,” “Transformer,” “contrastive learning,” “meta learning,” and “knowledge distillation,” with sources including CVPR, MICCAI, MIA, TMI, ISBI, MLMI, and MIDL, plus Google Scholar, arXiv, and PubMed.
- Analysis: papers were excluded if they did not report training dataset details or clearly state methods and validations; the review provides statistical analysis by modality, ROI, evaluation metric, and method category, and summarizes public datasets in Table 1.
Limitations
- The paper does not state a dedicated limitations section.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not describe a formal systematic review protocol, risk-of-bias assessment, or meta-analysis; inclusion relied on specified keywords, sources, and exclusions for missing dataset details or unclear methods/validations.
- Evident from the text: the abstract says 33 publicly available datasets, while the Datasets section says 30 public datasets are summarized in Table 1, an inconsistency in the paper itself.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
35 of 51 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisenone given
Previous reviews lack a summary of public datasets for benchmarking registration algorithms.
“On one hand, these reviews lack a summary of the public dataset for benchmarking registration algorithms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [19] Boveiri, 2020, Medical image registration using deep neural networks: A comprehensive review, Medical Image Analysis source
The cited review does summarize datasets used to evaluate registration approaches. Its Literature Review Analysis (p. 35) lists frequently used datasets, distinguishes private datasets from the others, and presents their frequency of use in Figure 35. That is contrary to describing this review as lacking a dataset summary. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [20] Fu, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A review, Phys Med Biol source
The Benchmark section says the review summarizes brain registration datasets. Its Brain subsection says table 11 lists datasets to facilitate benchmarking, and the Statistics section notes the availability of public brain datasets. This contradicts the claim that this review lacks such a summary. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [21] Haskins, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A survey, Mach Vision Appl source
The survey describes its scope as reviewing deep-learning registration methods (p. 1), and its Conclusion (p. 22) discusses dataset availability as a research challenge. Neither passage says whether this or other previous reviews lack a summary of public benchmarking datasets. Searches for public datasets and benchmarking found no passage that settles that claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Xiao, 2021, A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods, Quantitative Imaging Med Surg source
The Review Article section says few earlier reviews focused on 3D medical image registration, but does not say they lacked public-dataset summaries. The Statistical analysis section explains why public datasets are useful for fair benchmarking and says this review summarizes them in Table 1; neither passage establishes what earlier reviews omitted. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Previous reviews about deep learning-based medical image registration literature have been published.
“Though previous reviews about deep learning-based medical image registration literature have been published (19–22), there are still some deficiencies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [19] Boveiri, 2020, Medical image registration using deep neural networks: A comprehensive review, Medical Image Analysis source
- cites [20] Fu, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A review, Phys Med Biol source
- cites [21] Haskins, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A survey, Mach Vision Appl source
- cites [22] Xiao, 2021, A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods, Quantitative Imaging Med Surg source
- Premisecitation
Wu et al. firstly proposed to adopt deep learning technology to obtain the similarity metric for registration.
“Wu et al. (56) firstly proposed to adopt deep learning technology to obtain the similarity metric for registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Wu, 2013 source
The Abstract and Method §2.2 describe using deep learning to obtain features for detecting correspondences in image registration. Method §2.2 says similarity between those learned feature vectors is measured by normalized cross-correlation, not by a learned similarity metric. The paper also does not establish the claim that Wu et al. were the first to propose this approach; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The dynamics of optimization in neural ODE models are naturally continuous.
“Additionally, the dynamics of optimization are naturally continuous.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] Chen, 2018, Neural ordinary differential equations source
The Introduction (p. 1) describes the hidden-state dynamics of neural ODEs as continuous, and Section 2 (p. 2) describes computing training gradients by solving an ODE backward in time. Neither passage says that the dynamics of optimization itself are naturally continuous; the claim shifts the continuity from model states and gradient computation to optimization. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Compared to well-known deep learning models like ResNet and U-Net, neural ODE models are more efficient in terms of memory and parameters.
“Compared to well-known deep learning models like ResNet and U-Net, neural ODE models are more efficient in terms of memory and parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] Chen, 2018, Neural ordinary differential equations source
Table 1 in Section 3 (p. 3) reports that the ODE-Net used fewer parameters than the tested ResNet (0.22M versus 0.60M) and had constant rather than depth-dependent memory cost. The comparison is specific to those MNIST models; our copy does not provide a memory or parameter comparison with U-Net. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
After selection and screening, 91 studies related to learning-based medical image registration were included.
“After the selection and screening, 91 studies related to learning-based medical image registration were finally included.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
There are few studies about RL-based algorithms on deformable registration.
“Instead, there are a few studies about RL-based algorithms on deformable registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Unsupervised registration has a more convenient training process that usually only inputs paired images without predefined DVF as the ground truth.
“Thus, the unsupervised registration has a more convenient training process that usually only inputs paired images without predefined DVF as the ground truth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Fully supervised methods help to predict transformations in one shot by the supervision of real deformation vector fields or synthetic deformation fields.
“Fully supervised methods help to predict transformations in one shot by the supervision of real deformation vector fields or synthetic deformation fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The current trend for validating the accuracy of proposed registration models commonly requires segmentation labels as ground truth.
“this statistical analysis demonstrates the current trend for validating the accuracy of the proposed registration model that commonly requires the segmentation labels as the ground truth.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
These fully supervised methods have achieved notable results with real deformation fields as supervision.
“These methods have achieved notable results with real deformation fields as supervision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Ma et al. adopted deep reinforcement learning to extract the best feature representation to minimize discrepancy between CT and MRI images for rigid registration.
“Ma et al. (71) adopted deep reinforcement learning to extract the best feature representation to minimize the discrepancy between CT and MRI images for rigid registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [71] Ma, 2017, Multimodal image registration with deep context reinforcement learning source
- Premisecitation
Liao et al. firstly proposed to train an artificial agent for rigid registration of 3D CT images and cone-beam CT (CBCT) images for cardiac and abdominal images.
“Liao et al. (70) firstly proposed to train an artificial agent for the rigid registration of 3D CT images and cone-beam CT (CBCT) images for cardiac and abdominal images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [70] Liao, 2017, An artificial agent for robust image registration source
- Interpretationnone given
Supervision by real deformation fields is limited by the size and diversity of the dataset.
“However, supervision by real deformation fields is limited by the size and the diversity of the dataset.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Krebs et al. applied RL to deformable prostate MRI registration by training an agent to investigate the parametric space of a statistical deformation model constructed with training data.
“In 2017, Krebs et al. (72) applied RL to deformable prostate MRI registration by training an agent to investigate the parametric space of a statistical deformation model constructed with training data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [72] Krebs, 2017, Robust non-rigid registration through agent-based action learning source
- Interpretationreasoning
Deep learning-based models are capable of improving deformable registration performance.
“Deep learning-based models are capable of improving the deformable registration performance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Deep neural networks can prompt the iterative optimization procedure to the training stage and achieve fast inference in the test stage.
- Rests on an assumption: Neural networks are able to work as an approximator of the similarity between the image pairs to help registration.
- Rests on an assumption: The deformation field can be predicted directly through an end-to-end model without pre-defining a transformation model.
- Interpretationcitation
Transformer is the most popular technique in medical image registration.
“Transformer (160) is the most popular technique in medical image registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [160] Vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
The GAN framework has shown promising results in cross-modality medical image registration.
“The GAN framework has shown promising results in cross-modality medical image registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Adding anatomical constraints to deep networks can help to generate realistic deformations.
“adding anatomical constraints to deep networks can help to generate realistic deformations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
In deep learning-based deformable registration methods, two main strategies are proposed to guarantee the diffeomorphism of the deformation fields.
“In deep learning-based deformable registration methods, two main strategies are proposed to guarantee the diffeomorphism of the deformation fields.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The weakly supervised paradigm is applicable in medical image segmentation.
“this weakly supervised paradigm is applicable in medical image segmentation”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Anatomical labels such as segmentations and key points are feasible in practice and credible for training.
- Interpretationreasoning
Similarity-based unsupervised registration methods mainly focus on mono-modality.
“however, they mainly focus on mono-modality”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Predicting the deformation field without constraints can lead to a warped moving image with distorted unrealistic organ appearances.
“Predicting the deformation field without constraints can lead to warped moving image with distorted unrealistic organ appearances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Segmentations can add extra anatomical constraints for image registration.
“segmentations are capable of adding extra anatomical constraints for image registration”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Anatomical labels such as segmentations and key points are feasible in practice and credible for training.
- Interpretationreasoning
Applying appropriate constraints can help the network learn a deformation field that keeps the topology of the input image pairs so that the registration is more reliable in clinical applications.
“applying appropriate constraints can help the network learn a deformation field that keeps the topology of the input image pairs so that the registration is more reliable in clinical applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Studies utilizing public datasets could be more inclined to investigate the brain, lung, and prostate.
“Thus, studies utilizing public datasets could be more inclined to investigate the brain, lung, and prostate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Image intensity similarity metrics are inappropriate in multimodality registration tasks.
“the image intensity similarity metrics would be inappropriate in multimodality registration tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The magnitude of the deformation field might be restricted by the employment of such regularization terms.
“The magnitude of the field might be restricted by the employment of such regularization terms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Labeled atlas images can be utilized for segmentation through image registration.
“labeled atlas images can be utilized for segmentation through image registration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Many similarity-based unsupervised registration methods achieve state-of-the-art performance compared to conventional methods.
“Many groups have proved that their proposed similarity-based method could achieve SOTA performance compared to conventional methods”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The first strategy to guarantee diffeomorphism is to add an explicit constraint (regularization) for the learned deformation field.
“The first strategy is to add an explicit constraint (regularization) for the learned deformation field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 63
- May combine two claims. 45
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationADNI develops standardized protocols for multi-center comparison and has helped over 1,000 scientific publications explore prevention and treatment of AD since 2004.
“ADNI develops standardized protocols for multi-center comparison and helps over 1,000 scientific publications explore the prevention and treatment of AD since 2004”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Jack, 2008, The alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): Mri methods, J Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Off J Int Soc Magnetic Resonance Med source
The Abstract and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) describe ADNI’s development of standardized MRI methods for multisite studies. The Results mention a protocol-selection meeting in 2004, but our copy does not substantiate the claim that ADNI helped over 1,000 publications explore AD prevention and treatment since then. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe ADNI dataset contains MRI longitudinal image scans in AD patients from 63 sites across the US and Canada.
“The ADNI dataset as one example in brain datasets contains MRI longitudinal image scans in AD patients from 63 sites across the US and Canada.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Jack, 2008, The alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): Mri methods, J Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Off J Int Soc Magnetic Resonance Med source
The Abstract describes longitudinal MRI scans of participants with Alzheimer’s disease at multiple North American sites. It specifies 55 participating sites, however, not the claimed 63, and does not explicitly identify the countries as the US and Canada. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationWu et al. used convolutional-stacked autoencoder (CAE) to extract discriminative features for 3D deformable brain MRI registration, and registration was performed by optimizing NCC of the two features, achieving improved registration accuracy.
“They adopted convolutional-stacked autoencoder (CAE) to extract the discriminative features for 3D deformable brain MRI registration. Then, the registration was performed by optimizing the NCC of the two features and improved registration accuracy was achieved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [56] Wu, 2013 source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPROMISE12 is the dataset made for the MICCAI prostate segmentation challenge, used by 11 academic teams for various segmentation algorithms and showed promising results.
“PROMISE12 as the example in the prostate dataset is the dataset made for MICCAI prostate segmentation challenge, which was used by 11 academic teams for various segmentation algorithms and showed promising results”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Litjens, 2014, Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for mri: The promise12 challenge, Med Image Anal source
The Introduction describes the PROMISE12 dataset and its use in a challenge associated with the MICCAI2012 workshop. The Abstract reports 11 participating teams, varied segmentation methods, and good-to-excellent average algorithm performance. However, the teams came from both academic research groups and industry, not exclusively academia. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore than 375 publications have used COPDGene to explore assessment and identify biomarkers of COPD since 2009.
“More than 375 publications have used COPDGene to explore the assessment and identify the biomarkers of COPD since 2009”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Regan, 2011, Genetic epidemiology of copd (copdgene) study design, COPD: J Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Dis source
The Conclusion (page unavailable) says COPDGene’s CT phenotyping may generate diagnostic imaging biomarkers, and its data will be available for future studies. The paper does not report that more than 375 publications have used COPDGene since 2009; it describes those uses as prospective. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFu et al. designed an MR-TRUS registration network for prostate interventions; the supervision deformation field is generated from population-based FE models from point clouds with biomechanical constraints.
“Recently, Fu et al. (75) designed an MR-TRUS registration network for prostate interventions; the supervision deformation field is generated from population-based FE models from point clouds with biomechanical constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [75] Fu, 2021, Biomechanically constrained non-rigid mr-trus prostate registration using deep learning based 3d point cloud matching, Med Image Anal source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFan et al. presented a Birnet for brain MRI image registration by utilizing the deformation field estimated from the traditional registration method.
“Fan et al. (74) presented a Birnet for brain MRI image registration by utilizing the deformation field estimated from the traditional registration method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] Fan, 2019, Birnet: Brain image registration using dual-supervised fully convolutional networks, Med Image Anal source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRegistration is of great significance in radiotherapy; it is performed to calculate the offset of the current target from the planned position, and the offset is used to adjust patient position or radiation beam.
“Moreover, registration is also of great significance in radiotherapy (11, 12); it is performed to calculate the offset of the current target from the planned position, and the offset determined from the registration is used to adjust the patient position or the radiation beam.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Krilavicius, 2016, Predicting respiratory motion for real-time tumour tracking in radiotherapy source
The Introduction describes determining a tumour’s current position and compensating for motion by repositioning the beam; the Abstract also mentions controlling the couch or beam. Neither passage describes registration to calculate an offset from the planned position, so the claim’s registration-specific explanation is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [12] Brock, 2017, Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the aapm radiation therapy committee task group no. 132, Med Phys source
Section 1.B.3 states that registration determines the patient's offset from the planned position and that the resulting transformation is typically used to adjust patient position. Section 6.D.2 also discusses target-focused registration at treatment delivery. The cited passages do not establish that the offset is used to adjust the radiation beam, so that alternative is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationYang et al. proposed to register brain MRI images using a U-Net-like structure in one step.
“At first, Yang et al. (73) proposed to register brain MRI images using a U-Net-like structure in one step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] Yang, 2016, Fast predictive image registration source
The Network Structure section (p. 3) describes an encoder–decoder network using patches from fixed and moving images, and the paper tests it on brain images (Experiments, p. 5). But the network predicts LDDMM initial momentum, from which the deformation is computed by integration (Initial Momentum LDDMM Parameterization, p. 2); the copy does not establish that registration is completed in one step. It calls the encoder VGG-style rather than U-Net-like, though the encoder–decoder description supports that resemblance. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenSome details of the selected literature were missing in previous reviews.
“On the other hand, some details of the selected literature were missing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked- cites [19] Boveiri, 2020, Medical image registration using deep neural networks: A comprehensive review, Medical Image Analysis source
The Reference Gathering Methodology (p. 3) says the authors found that their initial search overlooked some references, but it does not say that previous reviews omitted details of their selected literature. Searches for previous reviews and missing literature details found no passage in our copy addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [20] Fu, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A review, Phys Med Biol source
The Introduction says that few previous reviews focused specifically on deep learning in medical image registration, and describes this review's aim to provide detailed statistics. It does not say that previous reviews omitted details of their selected literature. Searches for missing details in previous reviews found no passage addressing that point; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [21] Haskins, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A survey, Mach Vision Appl source
The Introduction (p. 3) describes how this survey organizes the methods it covers, and the Conclusion (p. 22) summarizes their challenges. Neither passage says that previous reviews omitted details of their selected literature; searches for that comparison found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Xiao, 2021, A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods, Quantitative Imaging Med Surg source
The Review Article section says that few earlier reviews focused on 3D medical image registration, but it does not say they omitted details of their selected literature. Searches for missing or omitted details in previous reviews found no passage addressing that claim. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSpatial transformer networks (STNs) introduced in 2015 are one significant advancement beneficial in this era.
“The spatial transformer networks (STNs) (80) introduced in 2015 is one significant advancement that is beneficial in this era.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Jaderberg, 2015, Spatial transformer networks source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSTN can be inserted anywhere in various networks to execute a spatial transform on an input feature map because it is a completely differentiable module.
“STN can be inserted anywhere in various networks to execute a spatial transform on an input feature map because it is a completely differentiable module.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Jaderberg, 2015, Spatial transformer networks source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTraditional registration algorithms are constructed as continuous optimization problems or discrete optimization problems.
“The traditional registration algorithms are constructed as continuous optimization problems (15, 16) or discrete optimization problems (17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [15] Thirion, 1998, Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with maxwell’s demons, Med Image Anal source
The Abstract (no page given) describes diffusion-based image matching and relates it to traditional attraction-based methods, but does not classify registration algorithms as continuous or discrete optimization problems. Searches for both optimization terms returned no passage in our copy that addresses that distinction. (LLM, conf=0.70)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [16] Rueckert, 1999, Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast mr images, IEEE Trans Med Imaging source
- cites [17] Heinrich, 2013, Towards realtime multimodal fusion for image-guided interventions using self-similarities source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMRI provides better contrast for soft tissues, and CT has clear details of bone.
“magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides better contrast for soft tissues, and computed tomography (CT) has clear details of bone (3)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] Huang, 2020, A review of multimodal medical image fusion techniques, Comput Math Methods Med source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCOPDGene contains chest CT scans of more than 10,000 individuals for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
“COPDGene as one example in lung datasets contains chest CT scans of more than 10,000 individuals for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] Regan, 2011, Genetic epidemiology of copd (copdgene) study design, COPD: J Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Dis source
The Abstract’s Methods/Results section says COPDGene planned to enroll 10,000 smokers, with and without COPD, and obtain chest CT scans from all participants. It does not establish that the dataset already contained scans from more than 10,000 individuals. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSokooti et al. presented a multi-scale network to learn a deformation field of intra-subject 3D chest CT registration, using random DVF as supervision.
“Sokooti et al. (77) presented a multi-scale network to learn a deformation field of intra-subject 3D chest CT registration. They used random DVF as supervision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] Sokooti, 2017, Nonrigid image registration using multi-scale 3d convolutional neural network source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTraditional registration algorithms' computational performance is hampered by high dimension and non-convex properties, and their capability to capture complex deformations is limited.
“Their computational performance, however, is hampered by the high dimension and non-convex properties, and their capability to capture complex deformations is limited (18).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Schnabel, 2016, Advances and challenges in deformable image registration: From image fusion to complex motion modelling, Medical Image Analysis source
Section 2.2 says traditional B-spline registration has difficulty with motion discontinuities and describes newer methods that avoid local minima and reduce computational complexity. The paper also says continuous optimization can be prone to local minima. These passages support limitations in modelling complex motion and aspects of computational difficulty, but they do not attribute poor computational performance specifically to high dimensionality or non-convexity. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNeural ODE models have the advantage of adaptive computing, making them potentially appropriate for application in medical applications.
“Neural ODE models have the advantage of adaptive computing, making them potentially appropriate for application in medical applications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [163] Chen, 2018, Neural ordinary differential equations source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccessing medical data is not allowed for most researchers since clinical data contain private information and only researchers with authorization could utilize the dataset.
“Finally, accessing medical data is not allowed for most researchers since the clinical data contain private information and only researchers with authorization could utilize the dataset (25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Li, 2021, A systematic collection of medical image datasets for deep learning, arXiv source
Section 6.1 says most non-medical researchers lack authorization to access clinical data and explains that privacy and ethical restrictions limit access. The citing sentence broadens this to most researchers generally, which the passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataDSC is the most popular evaluation metric, accounting for 46% of all studies.
“Based on Figure 1C , DSC is the most popular metric and accounts for 46% of all the studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe review summarized 30 public datasets from deep learning registration studies in Table 1.
“Our review summarized 30 public datasets from deep learning registration studies in Table 1 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe three most popular ROIs investigated are brain, lung, and prostate, accounting for 47%, 19%, and 14% of all studies.
“The three most popular ROIs being investigated are brain, lung, and the prostate, and each accounts for 47%, 19%, and 14% of all the studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMR-MR and CT-CT are the most commonly studied modalities in the selected studies, accounting for 50% and 30% respectively.
“As shown in Figure 1A , MR-MR and CT-CT are the most commonly studied modalities, and each accounts for 50% and 30% of the selected studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataUnsupervised and supervised methods are the two most popular method categories, accounting for 31% and 22% of all studies respectively.
“Unsupervised and supervised methods are two most popular methods and each accounts for 31% and 22% of all the studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost of the summarized datasets consist of brain MR and lung CT images, with other modalities in ROIs such as abdomen and knee also included.
“Most of the datasets consist of brain MR and lung CT images, and other modalities in different ROIs such as the abdomen and knee were also included.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningThe number of literatures for the deep similarity metric category has decreased, and this trend is projected to continue.
“Nowadays, the number of literatures for this category has decreased, and this trend is projected to continue.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenWhen training a 3D lung CT registration network, a GPU card with a memory larger than 12 G is necessary.
“when training 3D lung CT registration network, a GPU card with a memory larger than 12 G is necessary.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataGAN has the smallest model parameter and the parameter of Transformer expands significantly.
“We can see that GAN has the smallest model parameter and the parameter of Transformer expands significantly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenIt is difficult to interpret learned deep similarity metrics, and the iterative process still limits the use of these methods.
“Moreover, it is difficult to interpret the learned deep similarity metrics, and the iterative process still limits the use of these methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFully supervised methods are widely studied and have notable results.
“The fully supervised methods are widely studied and have notable results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe formulation in the loss function of the learning network constrains the output DVF to be accurate.
“The formulation in the loss function of the learning network constrains the output DVF to be accurate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSimilarity measures in RL-based registration methods are routinely provided in a traditional way, e.g., MSE, NMI, or LCC, and thus they have limited applications in multimodality registration.
“Different from deep similarity metrics-based methods, the similarity measures in these kinds of methods are routinely provided in a traditional way, e.g., MSE, NMI, or LCC. Thus, they have limited applications in multimodality registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe generation of real or synthetic deformation fields is hard, and these deformation fields are different from the real ground truth, which will confine the accuracy and efficiency of these kinds of methods.
“However, the generation of real or synthetic deformation fields is hard, and these deformation fields are different from the real ground truth, which will confine the accuracy and efficiency of these kinds of methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenGenerally, the unsupervised learning framework consists of similarity-based methods and GAN-based methods.
“Generally, the unsupervised learning framework consists of the similarity-based methods and GAN-based methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPreparation of the required ground truth is inconvenient and leads to the supervised framework having limitations in generalizing results in different domains and applying various registration tasks.
“Even though different data augmentation techniques and data collection methods have been utilized in supervised learning, the preparation of the required ground truth is inconvenient and leads to the fact that the supervised framework has limitations in generalizing results in different domains and applying various registration tasks.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOAI contains MRI and x-ray longitudinal measurements from 4,796 subjects.
“OAI as the example in the knee dataset contains MRI and x-ray longitudinal measurements from 4,796 subjects”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Eckstein, 2014, Imaging research results from the osteoarthritis initiative (oai): A review and lessons learned 10 years after start of enrolment, Ann rheumatic Dis source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore than 400 research manuscripts have used OAI to explore assessments and interventions of knee osteoarthritis.
“more than 400 research manuscripts have used the OAI to explore the assessments and interventions of knee osteoarthritis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] Eckstein, 2014, Imaging research results from the osteoarthritis initiative (oai): A review and lessons learned 10 years after start of enrolment, Ann rheumatic Dis source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningRL-based methods mainly focus on rigid registration, as it is hard for agents to tackle the large state space generated from deformable vector field.
“Moreover, RL-based methods mainly focus on rigid registration, as it is hard for agents to tackle the large state space generated from deformable vector field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningDeep learning-based deformable registration methods have greatly attracted researchers' attention because data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired or unpaired images compared with traditional methods.
“Recently, deep learning-based deformable registration methods have greatly attracted researchers’ attention, as data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired/unpaired images when compared with traditional methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired or unpaired images when compared with traditional methods.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVarious traditional registration methods and toolboxes have been devised, including Elastix and ANTs.
“Various traditional registration methods and toolboxes have been devised over the last few decades, e.g., Elastix (13) and ANTs (14).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenReal deformation fields are generated from traditional registration, and synthetic deformation fields are obtained from statistical models or random transformations.
“The real deformation fields are generated from traditional registration, and the synthetic deformation fields are obtained from statistical models or random transformations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSystematic sextant TRUS biopsies have poor imaging quality and lack sharp contrast between cancer and normal tissue, resulting in false-negative rates of up to 30%.
“but for systematic sextant biopsies, its poor imaging quality and lack of sharp contrast between cancer and normal tissue results in false-negative rates of up to 30% (10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Norberg, 1997, The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer, Urology source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUzunova et al. designed a network for registration between 2D brain MRI and 2D cardiac MRI, with ground truth generated using statistical appearance models (SAMs), adapted FlowNet architecture, and obtained outperforming results.
“Uzunova et al. (78) designed a network for the registration between 2D brain MRI and 2D cardiac MRI. Their ground truth is generated utilizing statistical appearance models (SAMs). They adapted FlowNet (79) architecture and obtained outperforming results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSo et al. proposed a novel learning-based metric using Bhattacharyya Distances, where dissimilarity of testing image pairs is calculated by incorporating expected intensity distributions learned from registered training image pairs.
“So et al. (57) proposed a novel learning-based metric by using Bhattacharyya Distances. The dissimilarity of the testing image pairs is calculated by incorporating the expected intensity distributions learned from the registered training image pairs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] So, 2017, A novel learning-based dissimilarity metric for rigid and non-rigid medical image registration by using bhattacharyya distances, Pattern Recognition source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRohe et al. adopted a U-Net-like network to predict the deformation field for 3D cardiac MRI volume registration, with supervisions generated from mesh segmentations and SSD as loss; their results are comparable with traditional registration.
“Rohe et al. (76) adopted a U-Net-like network to predict the deformation field for 3D cardiac MRI volume registration. The supervisions are transformations generated from mesh segmentations, and SSD between the supervision and prediction is set as the loss function. Their results are comparable with those from traditional registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [76] Rohé, 2017, Svf-net: learning deformable image registration using shape matching source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA sufficient number of explicitly annotated ground truths are required for deep similarity metric training, which hinders the development of such approaches.
“However, a sufficient number of explicitly annotated ground truths are required for deep similarity metric training, which hinders the development of such approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenOne disadvantage of deep iterative methods is that the registration process is time-consuming and iterative.
“One disadvantage of deep iterative methods is that the registration process is time-consuming and iterative.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningTraining and assessment of DL models on multiple public datasets could better demonstrate generalizability and clearly compare results on fair benchmarks, including computational time and registration accuracy.
“the training and assessment of DL models on multiple public datasets could also better demonstrate the generalizability of the proposed methods and clearly compare the results on fair benchmarks, including computational time and registration accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningWeakly supervised methods naturally improve the performance of registration by introducing anatomical constraints.
“Weakly supervised methods naturally improve the performance of registration by introducing the anatomical constraints.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Anatomical labels such as segmentations and key points are feasible in practice and credible for training.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe constraints are usually performed by penalizing the small and large values of the Jacobian determinant.
“Usually, the constraints are performed by penalizing the small and large values of the Jacobian determinant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThese benefits encourage researchers to study how to use neural ODEs to optimize the registration of medical images.
“These benefits encourage researchers to study how to use neural ODEs to optimize the registration of medical images.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenTransformer is unavailable when the data size is large and GPU memory is limited.
“the Transformer is unavailable when the data size is large and GPU memory is limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnsupervised methods and weakly supervised methods are less reliant on ground truth information and have become hot topics for deep learning-based registration algorithms.
“In contrast, unsupervised methods and weakly supervised methods are less reliant on ground truth information and become hot topics for deep learning-based registration algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Supervised methods need ground truth supervision that is impractical to obtain.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe evolution of learning-based image registration algorithms has followed a similar path to that of deep learning models.
“The evolution of learning-based image registration algorithms has followed a similar path to that of the deep learning models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenRecently, popular networks such as Transformer and contrastive learning are explored for deformable medical image registration and achieved promising results.
“Recently, popular networks, such as Transformer and contrastive learning, are explored for deformable medical image registration and achieved promising results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSome datasets are still collecting data for further imaging analysis support, such as BraTS since 2012.
“Some datasets are still collecting data for further imaging analysis support, such as the data collected for BraTs since 2012 (37).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37] Bakas, 2018, Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge, arXiv source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenNeural ODE and diffusion models have been explored for deformable image registration.
“Nowadays, the popular neural ODE and diffusion models have also been explored for deformable image registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAnalyzing transformations in terms of spatially corresponding patches is challenging in multimodal registration and can negatively impact registration results.
“analyzing transformations in terms of spatially corresponding patches could be challenging in multimodal registration and can negatively impact registration results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningPrevalent and testified public databases are normally chosen by research teams in deep learning-based medical image analysis.
“prevalent and testified public databases are thus normally chosen by research teams in deep learning-based medical image analysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenCNNs, SAEs, GANs, DRLs, and deep RNNs make up the majority of the recently developed deep learning algorithms used for medical image registration.
“CNNs, SAEs, GANs, DRLs, and deep RNNs make up the majority of the recently developed deep learning algorithms used for medical image registration”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSegmentations are useful in evaluating registration algorithms.
“segmentations are also useful in evaluating the registration algorithms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMulti-stage coarse-to-fine methods consume large GPU memory and training is time-consuming as the networks are trained separately.
“This kind of method consumes large GPU memory and the training is time-consuming as the networks are trained separately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAnother method for learning large deformation is to construct cascaded networks, in which each cascaded network learns an intermediate deformation field and the source image is recursively and progressively warped by the field, finally aligned to the target image.
“Another method for learning large deformation is to construct cascaded networks, in which each cascaded network learns an intermediate deformation field, and the source image is recursively and progressively warped by the field, finally aligned to the target image.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningIn this situation, unsupervised methods are promising to tackle the problems of fully supervised methods.
“In this situation, unsupervised methods are promising to tackle the problems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe other method to guarantee diffeomorphism is to introduce diffeomorphic integration layers.
“The other method is to introduce diffeomorphic integration layers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe integration is performed by scaling and squaring the stationary velocity field.
“The integration is performed by scaling and squaring the stationary velocity field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenGAN can ensure that the generated registered image has the same intensity distribution as the source image while being similar to the target image in terms of structures.
“GAN can ensure that the generated registered image has the same characteristic (intensity distribution) as the source image while being similar to the target image in terms of structures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningUnsupervised similarity-based methods have become more popular in recent years and are appropriate in many deformable registration tasks as they do not require extra information.
“the unsupervised similarity-based methods have become more popular in recent years, and they are appropriate in many deformable registration tasks as they do not require extra information.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningCascaded networks are still memory-consuming and difficult to converge as all cascaded networks are trained simultaneously.
“This kind of network is still memory-consuming and is difficult to converge as all cascaded networks are trained simultaneously.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAn MRI session generally lasts 2 h under supervision and manipulation of professional researchers, and subjects are almost fully constrained in the specialized machine to obtain accurate data.
“Considering MRI method as the example, each session generally lasts 2 h under the supervision and manipulation of professional researchers, and during the scanning process, the subjects are almost fully constrained in the specialized machine in order to obtain accurate data (24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Young, 2015, What does an mri scan cost, Healthc Financ Manage
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenAdditional modules and branches add complexity to registration models.
“Expect the backbone parameters, additional modules and branches also add the complexity of the registration models.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenA number of registration methods for medical images based on deep similarity metrics have been studied and have shown great potential in multimodality image registration.
“So far, a number of registration methods for medical image based on deep similarity metrics have been studied and have shown great potential in multimodality image registration.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningImage registration and image segmentation are inextricably linked and can help one another.
“image registration and image segmentation are inextricably linked and can help one another.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenFrom 2013, researchers began to apply deep learning techniques to image registration, and applications of deep models for registration flourished from 2017.
“From 2013, researchers began to apply deep learning techniques to image registration, and the applications of deep models for registration flourished from 2017.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDeep similarity-based models and reinforcement learning-based methods adopt an iterative strategy, which is time-consuming.
“Deep similarity-based models and reinforcement learning-based methods adopt iterative strategy, which is time-consuming.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningPublic datasets normally contain scans within the brain, lung, and prostate ROIs because common diseases exist in these regions.
“The public datasets normally contain scans within these three ROIs as common diseases exist in these regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenImage registration neural networks are gradually moving from handling 2D images to 3D or 4D (dynamic) volumes, and converting from supervised methods to unsupervised methods and weakly supervised methods.
“Image registration neural networks are gradually moving from handling 2D images to 3D or 4D (dynamic) volumes, and converting from supervised methods to unsupervised methods and weakly supervised methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningDiffeomorphic image registration using deep models has caught the attention of researchers due to characteristics like topology preservation and transformation invertibility.
“Due to characteristics like topology preservation and transformation invertibility, diffeomorphic image registration using deep models has caught the attention of researchers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe learning of large and irregular deformation caused by organ movement (e.g., lung respiratory motion) is still a challenging problem and needs further research.
“The learning of large and irregular deformation caused by organ movement (e.g., lung respiratory motion) is still a challenging problem and needs further research.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningFrom the point of view of registration efficiency, the training time and network parameters still need promotion, especially for 3D image registration.
“From the point of view of registration efficiency, the training time and network parameters still need promotion, especially for 3D image registration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningThe guarantee for diffeomorphism in learning-based methods remains a challenging problem.
“the guarantee for diffeomorphism in learning-based methods remains a challenging problem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenDeep learning-based methods have shown high computational efficiency and comparable accuracy compared with traditional methods.
“Deep learning-based methods have shown high computational efficiency and comparable accuracy compared with traditional methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenOne strategy to address large deformation is to adopt a multi-stage coarse-to-fine architecture.
“one strategy to address the large deformation is to adopt multi-stage coarse-to-fine architecture.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenMore papers implement GAN in diverse registration tasks.
“currently, more papers implement GAN in diverse registration tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThe most commonly used technique for tackling this issue is to add the L2 norm on the gradient of the deformation field to regularize the predicted deformation.
“The most commonly used technique for tackling this issue is to add the L2 norm on the gradient of the deformation field to regularize the predicted deformation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Deformable registration is still a challenging task due to its intrinsic complexity, particularly when the deformation is large.
“deformable registration is still a challenging task due to its intrinsic complexity, particularly when the deformation is large.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In clinical practice, deformable registration can find much more applications than rigid and affine registration.
“In clinical practice, however, deformable registration can find much more applications than rigid and affine registration.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired or unpaired images when compared with traditional methods.
“as data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired/unpaired images when compared with traditional methods.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Deep neural networks can prompt the iterative optimization procedure to the training stage and achieve fast inference in the test stage.
“Firstly, deep neural networks can prompt the iterative optimization procedure to the training stage and achieve fast inference in the test stage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Neural networks are able to work as an approximator of the similarity between the image pairs to help registration.
“Secondly, neural networks are able to work as an approximator of the similarity between the image pairs to help registration.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The deformation field can be predicted directly through an end-to-end model without pre-defining a transformation model.
“Thirdly, the deformation field can be predicted directly through an end-to-end model without pre-defining a transformation model.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Intensity-based similarity measurements work quite well for mono-modality image registration, in which the image pair shares similar intensity distribution.
“Generally, these intensity-based similarity measurements work quite well for mono-modality image registration (e.g., CT-CT and MRI-MRI image registration), in which the image pair shares similar intensity distribution.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Intensity-based metrics are not capable of measuring multimodality registration due to the diverse intensity distributions across modalities.
“However, these metrics focus on intensity values; thus, they are not capable of measuring multimodality registration due to the diverse intensity distributions across modalities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The absence of relevant data is one of the main bottlenecks in current learning-based medical image analysis.
“The absence of relevant data, as one of the main bottlenecks in current learning-based medical image analysis, resulted from several challenges”
The paper relies on this without support.
Qualified medical images need to be acquired by strict protocols and expensive scanning devices.
“qualified medical images cannot be collected from handwritten ones but need to be acquired by strict protocols and expensive scanning devices.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Labels and annotation of medical images have to be achieved by specialized professionals.
“labels and the annotation of the medical images have to be achieved by specialized professionals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
To keep accuracy and avoid bias of the ground truth, a single scan might be labeled by multiple experts.
“in order to keep the accuracy and possibly avoid the bias of the ground truth, a single scan might be labeled by multiple experts.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Supervised methods need ground truth supervision that is impractical to obtain.
“Supervised methods need ground truth supervision that is impractical to obtain.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Anatomical labels such as segmentations and key points are feasible in practice and credible for training.
“such anatomical labels are feasible in practice and credible for training.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reference 125 is assigned different anatomical regions
MinorThe text describes reference 125 as abdominal CT registration, whereas Table 5 lists its organ as lung.
“Estienne et al. (125) developed a registration network for abdominal CT registration by applying spatial gradients and noisy segmentation labels.”
“| (125) | Noisy labels | Lung | CT | 3D | U-Net | DSC, HD, STD | MICCAI 2020 |”
Dataset count differs between the abstract and Datasets section
MinorThe abstract says the review summarizes 33 public datasets, while the Datasets section says 30. Table 1 lists 33 datasets, supporting the abstract's count.
“In addition, we summarize 33 publicly available datasets that are used for benchmarking the registration algorithms.”
“Our review summarized 30 public datasets from deep learning registration studies in Table 1 .”
Methods are classified into both five and four categories
MinorThe abstract lists five method categories, including Latest Methods, but the Methods section says there are four categories.
“These methods are classified into five categories: Deep Iterative Methods, Supervised Methods, Unsupervised Methods, Weakly Supervised Methods, and Latest Methods.”
“In this review, deep learning-based registration methods are classified into the following four categories by evolution: Deep Iterative Methods, Supervised Methods, Unsupervised Methods, and Weakly Supervised Methods.”
Cites
Jakubův, J., Chvalovský, K., Goertzel, Z., et al. (2023) · DROPS (Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz Center for Informatics) · doi:10.4230/lipics.itp.2023.19 · Cited by 76,648 · see citing works
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Compared to commonly used datasets such as the MINST (23), qualified medical images cannot be collected from handwritten ones but need to be acquired by strict protocols and expensive scanning devices.”
MethodSwin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windows
Liu, Z., Lin, Y., Cao, Y., Hu, H., Wei, Y., Zhang, Z., Lin, S., & Guo, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00986 · Cited by 35,534 · cited 12× · see citing works
“Frontiers in Oncology 13 Transformer (165) as the encoder to learn the spatial transformation between the input images.”
BackgroundInfluentialHuman-level control through deep reinforcement learning
Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14236 · Cited by 30,357 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Since the initial publishing from Mnih et al. (68) and Silver et al. (69), Reinforcement Learning (RL) has gained a lot of attention and has been used for diverse applications including robotics, video games, and healthcare.”
BackgroundMastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(69), Reinforcement Learning (RL) has gained a lot of attention and has been used for diverse applications including robotics, video games, and healthcare.”
BackgroundA simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations
Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., & Hinton, G. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2002.05709 · Cited by 10,857 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For contrastive learning (161), except for the application in brain MRI registration, Jiang et al.”
BackgroundMethodFischl, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.021 · Cited by 9,526 · see citing works
Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models
Ho, J., Jain, A., & Abbeel, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11239 · Cited by 8,712 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The latest deformable medical image registration algorithms are listed in Table 6; these methods adopted recent deep learning techniques, such as Transformer (160), contrastive learning (161), meta learning (162), neural ODE (163), and the diffusion model (164).”
MethodImage registration methods: a survey
Zitová, B., & Flusser, J. (2003) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/s0262-8856(03)00137-9 · Cited by 6,423 · cited 2× · see citing works
“arg min f∈F ‘(IT ,T(IS jFf )) + lR Ff (1)”
BackgroundNonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast mr images
Rueckert, D., Sonoda, L. I., Hayes, C., Hill, D. L. G., Leach, M. O., & Hawkes, D. J. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.796284 · Cited by 5,265 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Frontiers in Oncology 02 constructed as continuous optimization problems (15, 16) or discrete optimization problems (17).”
BackgroundThe Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository
Clark, K., Vendt, B., Smith, K., Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Koppel, P., Moore, S., Phillips, S., Maffitt, D., Pringle, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Digital Imaging · doi:10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7 · Cited by 4,599 · cited 1× · see citing works
“TCIA (45) CBCT, CT Lung 3D More than 2017 Lung Cancer Database for cancer research”
MethodThe Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI): MRI methods
Jack, C. R., Bernstein, M. A., Fox, N. C., Thompson, P., Alexander, G., Harvey, D., Borowski, B., Britson, P. J., L. Whitwell, J., Ward, C., et al. (2008) · Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1002/jmri.21049 · Cited by 4,347 · cited 4× · see citing works
“ADNI develops standardized protocols for multi-center comparison and helps over 1,000 scientific publications explore the prevention and treatment of AD since 2004 and would be funded further in the future (26).”
BackgroundInfluentialFlownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks
Dosovitskiy, A., Fischer, P., Ilg, E., Hausser, P., Hazirbas, C., Golkov, V., Smagt, P. V. D., Cremers, D., & Brox, T. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.316 · Cited by 4,313 · cited 1× · see citing works
“They adapted FlowNet (79) architecture and obtained outperforming results.”
ResultElastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration
Klein, S., Staring, M., Murphy, K., Viergever, M. A., & Pluim, J. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2009.2035616 · Cited by 4,311 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Various traditional registration methods and toolboxes have been devised over the last few decades, e.g., Elastix (13) and ANTs (14).”
MethodDi Martino, A., Yan, C.-G., Li, Q., Denio, E., Castellanos, F. X., Alaerts, K., Anderson, J. S., Assaf, M., Bookheimer, S. Y., Dapretto, M., et al. (2014) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2013.78 · Cited by 2,780 · see citing works
Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with maxwell’s demons
Thirion, J.-P. (1998) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/s1361-8415(98)80022-4 · Cited by 2,445 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Frontiers in Oncology 02 constructed as continuous optimization problems (15, 16) or discrete optimization problems (17).”
BackgroundEvaluation of 14 nonlinear deformation algorithms applied to human brain MRI registration
Klein, A., Andersson, J., Ardekani, B. A., Ashburner, J., Avants, B., Chiang, M.-C., Christensen, G. E., Collins, D. L., Gee, J., Hellier, P., et al. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.037 · Cited by 2,227 · cited 4× · see citing works
“LPBA40 (34) MRI Brain 3D 40 2007 Normal 56 labeled structures”
BackgroundInfluentialVoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registration
Balakrishnan, G., Zhao, A., Sabuncu, M. R., Guttag, J. V., & Dalca, A. V. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2019.2897538 · Cited by 2,199 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Balakrishnan et al. (94) designed a U-Net framework named VoxelMorph to perform DIR of brain MR images.”
MethodMarcus, D. S., Wang, T. H., Parker, J., Csernansky, J. G., Morris, J. C., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1498 · Cited by 2,163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“OASIS (27) MRI, PET Brain 3D 1664 Since 2007 AD Longitudinal study in AD”
BackgroundNeural ordinary differential equations
Chen, R. T. Q., Rubanova, Y., Bettencourt, J., & Duvenaud, D. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.07366 · Cited by 2,097 · see citing works
The Parkinson Progression Marker Initiative (PPMI)
MAREK, K. L., Jennings, D. L., Lasch, S., Siderowf, A. D., Tanner, C. M., Simuni, T., Coffey, C. S., Kieburtz, K. D., Flagg, E., Chowdhury, S., et al. (2011) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.09.005 · Cited by 1,888 · cited 1× · see citing works
“PPMI (31) MRI Brain 3D 423 2011 PD Identify biomarkers of PD progression”
BackgroundContrastive Learning for Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation
Park, T., Efros, A. A., Zhang, R., & Zhu, J.-Y. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58545-7_19 · Cited by 1,605 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For contrastive learning (161), except for the application in brain MRI registration, Jiang et al. (166) developed a network to generate pseudo-CT from MRI for brain radiotherapy based on a contrastive unpaired translation network (CUT) (167).”
BackgroundBakas, S., Reyes, M., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Rempfler, M., Crimi, A., Shinohara, R. T., Berger, C., Ha, S. M., Rozycki, M., et al. (2018) · Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository · doi:10.17863/cam.38755 · Cited by 1,441 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Some datasets are still collecting data for further imaging analysis support, such as the data collected for BraTs since 2012 (37).”
BackgroundMethodBakas, S., Reyes, M., Jakab, A., Bauer, S., Rempfler, M., Crimi, A., Shinohara, R. T., Berger, C., Ha, S. M., Rozycki, M., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.02629 · Cited by 1,441
Genetic epidemiology of copd (copdgene) study design
Regan, E. A., Hokanson, J. E., Murphy, J. R., Make, B., Lynch, D. A., Beaty, T. H., Curran-Everett, D., Silverman, E. K., & Crapo, J. D. (2011) · COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.3109/15412550903499522 · Cited by 1,313 · cited 1× · see citing works
“More than 375 publications have used COPDGene to explore the assessment and identify the biomarkers of COPD since 2009 (47).”
Background101 Labeled Brain Images and a Consistent Human Cortical Labeling Protocol
Klein, A., & Tourville, J. A. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00171 · Cited by 1,215 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MindBoggle 101 (35) MRI Brain 3D 101 2012 Normal Labeled cortices with DKT protocol”
BackgroundA perspective view and survey of meta-learning
Vilalta, R., & Drissi, Y. (2002) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1023/a:1019956318069 · Cited by 1,108 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The latest deformable medical image registration algorithms are listed in Table 6; these methods adopted recent deep learning techniques, such as Transformer (160), contrastive learning (161), meta learning (162), neural ODE (163), and the diffusion model (164).”
MethodAdvanced Normalization Tools (ANTs)
Avants, B. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5138159 · Cited by 982 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Various traditional registration methods and toolboxes have been devised over the last few decades, e.g., Elastix (13) and ANTs (14).”
MethodBrock, K. K., Mutic, S., McNutt, T. R., Li, H., & Kessler, M. L. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12256 · Cited by 881 · see citing works
Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for mri: The promise12 challenge
Litjens, G., Toth, R., van de Ven, W., Hoeks, C., Kerkstra, S., van Ginneken, B., Vincent, G., Guillard, G., Birbeck, N., Zhang, J., et al. (2014) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2013.12.002 · Cited by 857 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Frontiers in Oncology 04 which was used by 11 academic teams for various segmentation algorithms and showed promising results (55).”
BackgroundInfluentialTransMorph: Transformer for unsupervised medical image registration
Chen, J., Frey, E. C., He, Y., Segars, W. P., Li, Y., & Du, Y. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102615 · Cited by 826 · cited 4× · see citing works
“(150) Transformer Brain MRI 3D DSC, [J] MIA 2022”
InfluentialA deep learning framework for unsupervised affine and deformable image registration
de Vos, B. D., Berendsen, F. F., Viergever, M. A., Sokooti, H., Staring, M., & Išgum, I. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2018.11.010 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
DeepOrgan: Multi-level Deep Convolutional Networks for Automated Pancreas Segmentation
Roth, H. R., Lu, L., Farag, A., Shin, H.-C., Liu, J., Turkbey, E. B., & Summers, R. M. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24553-9_68 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
VoxelMorph: A Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image RegistrationPreprint
Balakrishnan, G., Zhao, A. T., Sabuncu, M. R., Guttag, J. V., & Dalca, A. V. (2019) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Deep learning in medical image registration: a survey
Haskins, G., Kruger, U., & Yan, P. (2020) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-020-01060-x · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Simpson, A. L., Antonelli, M., Bakas, S., Bilello, M., Farahani, K., van Ginneken, B., Kopp‐Schneider, A., Landman, B. A., Litjens, G. J. S., Menze, B. H., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.09063 · Cited by 703 · see citing works
Deep learning in medical image registration: a review
Fu, Y., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X. (2020) · Physics in Medicine & Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab843e · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Deep MR to CT Synthesis Using Unpaired Data
Wolterink, J. M., Dinkla, A. M., Savenije, M. H. F., Seevinck, P. R., van den Berg, C. A. T., & Išgum, I. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68127-6_2 · Cited by 652 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(113) cycloss Brain MR-CT 2D cycGAN MAE, PSNR SASHIMI 2017”
Castillo, R., Castillo, E., Guerra, R., Johnson, V., McPhail, T., Garg, A. K., & Guerrero, T. (2009) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/54/7/001 · Cited by 645 · cited 1× · see citing works
“DirLAB (42) CT Lung 3D 10 2009 Normal 300 landmarks”
BackgroundQuicksilver: Fast predictive image registration – A deep learning approach
Yang, X., Kwitt, R., Styner, M., & Niethammer, M. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.008 · Cited by 630 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(82) Real DVF Brain MRI 3D CNN Deformation error, [J] NeuroImage 2017”
MethodAdvanced Normalization Tools: V1.0
Avants, B., Tustison, N. J., & Song, G. (2009) · The Insight Journal · doi:10.54294/uvnhin · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Milham, M. P., Fair, D. A., Mennes, M., & Mostofsky, S. H. (2012) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2012.00062 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Weakly-supervised convolutional neural networks for multimodal image registration
Hu, Y., Marc Modat, A., Gibson, E., Li, W., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Wang, G., Bandula, S., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., et al. (2018) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2018.07.002 · Cited by 460 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(129) Anatomical labels Prostate MRI-US 3D CNN DSC, TRE MIA 2018”
BackgroundEvaluation of Registration Methods on Thoracic CT: The EMPIRE10 Challenge
Murphy, K., van Ginneken, B., Reinhardt, J. M., Kabus, S., Ding, K., Deng, X. H., Cao, K., Du, K., Christensen, G. E., Garcia, V., et al. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2011.2158349 · Cited by 441 · cited 1× · see citing works
“EMPIRE10 (46) CBCT Lung 3D 30 2010 Normal Intra-patient registration”
BackgroundHeller, N. E., Sathianathen, N. J., Kalapara, A. A., Walczak, E. G., Moore, K., Kaluzniak, H., Rosenberg, J. E., Blake, P., Rengel, Z., Oestreich, M., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.00445 · Cited by 438 · cited 1× · see citing works
“KiTS19 (49) CT Kidney 3D 300 2019 Kidney tumor Partial or radical nephrectomy patients”
BackgroundHolmes, A. J., Hollinshead, M. O., O’Keefe, T. M., Petrov, V. I., Fariello, G., Wald, L. L., Fischl, B. R., Rosen, B. R., Mair, R. W., Roffman, J. L., et al. (2015) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.31 · Cited by 436 · cited 1× · see citing works
“GSP (33) MRI, fMRI Brain 3D 1570 2015 Normal Rapid imaging protocol”
MethodNorberg, M., Egevad, L., Holmberg, L., Sparén, P., Norlén, B. J., & Busch, C. (1997) · Urology · doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00306-3 · Cited by 423 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy, it is the most effective way to diagnose prostate cancer, with the advantages of real-time detection, simplicity, and low cost, but for systematic sextant biopsies, its poor imaging quality and lack of sharp contrast between cancer and normal tissue results in…”
BackgroundCycleMorph: Cycle consistent unsupervised deformable image registration
Kim, B., Kim, D. H., Park, S. H., Kim, J., Lee, J., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102036 · Cited by 346 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(101) CC Lung, Brain CT, MRI 3D CNN TRE, DSC, [J], Time MIA 2021”
BackgroundNonrigid Image Registration Using Multi-scale 3D Convolutional Neural Networks
Sokooti, H., de Vos, B., Berendsen, F., Lelieveldt, B. P. F., Išgum, I., & Staring, M. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_27 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Svf-net: learning deformable image registration using shape matching
Rohé, M.-M., Datar, M., Heimann, T., Sermesant, M., & Pennec, X. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_31 · Cited by 330 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(76) adopted a U-Net-like network to predict the deformation field for 3D cardiac MRI volume registration.”
MethodBirnet: Brain image registration using dual-supervised fully convolutional networks
Fan, J., Cao, X., Yap, P.-T., & Shen, D. (2019) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2019.03.006 · Cited by 297 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(74) Real DVF Brain MRI 3D FCN DSC MIA 2019”
MethodGuorong Wu, A., Kim, M., Wang, Q., Munsell, B. C., & Shen, D. G. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2496253 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Twenty New Digital Brain Phantoms for Creation of Validation Image Data Bases
Aubert-Broche, B., Griffin, M., Pike, G. B., Evans, A. C., & Collins, D. L. (2006) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2006.883453 · Cited by 265 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Simulated Brain (39) MRI Brain 3D 20 2006 Normal Simulated medical imaging”
BackgroundDeformable Image Registration Based on Similarity-Steered CNN Regression
Cao, X., Yang, J., Zhang, J., Nie, D., Kim, M., Wang, Q., & Shen, D. G. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_35 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Harvard Aging Brain Study: Dataset and accessibility
Dagley, A. S., LaPoint, M. R., Huijbers, W., Hedden, T., McLaren, D. G., Chatwal, J. P., Papp, K. V., Amariglio, R. E., Blacker, D., Rentz, D. M., et al. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.069 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Robust non-rigid registration through agent-based action learning
Krebs, J., Mansi, T., Delingette, H., Zhang, L., Ghesu, F. C., Miao, S., Maier, A. K., Ayache, N., Liao, R., & Kamen, A. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_40 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
A Deep Metric for Multimodal Registration
Simonovsky, M., Gutiérrez-Becker, B., Mateus, D., Navab, N., & Nikos Komodakis, A. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46726-9_2 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
A review of multimodal medical image fusion techniques
Huang, B., Yang, F., Yin, M., Mo, X., & Zhong, C. (2020) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2020/8279342 · Cited by 220 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…as medical images from different modalities keep different characteristics; for example, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides better contrast for soft tissues, and computed tomography (CT) has clear details of bone (3); fusing these data helps to assure better diagnosis and treatment.”
BackgroundGousias, I. S., Edwards, A. D., Rutherford, M., Counsell, S. J., Hajnal, J. V., Rueckert, D., & Hammers, A. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.083 · Cited by 219 · cited 1× · see citing works
“ALBERTs (38) MRI Brain 3D 20 2012 Normal Cerebral MRIs of newborns”
BackgroundGollub, R. L., Shoemaker, J. M., King, M. D., White, T. J. H., Ehrlich, S., Sponheim, S. R., Clark, V. P., Turner, J. A., Mueller, B. A., Magnotta, V. A., et al. (2013) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-013-9184-3 · Cited by 212 · cited 1× · see citing works
“MCIC (30) MRI, fMRI, DWI Brain 3D 161 2013 Schizophrenia Multimodal imaging for schizophrenia.”
BackgroundAn artificial agent for robust image registration
Liao, R., Miao, S., De Tournemire, P., Grbic, S., Kamen, A., Mansi, T., & Comaniciu, D. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v31i1.11230 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Medical image registration using deep neural networks: A comprehensive review
Boveiri, H. R., Khayami, R., Javidan, R., & Mehdizadeh, A. (2020) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106767 · Cited by 179 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Though previous reviews about deep learning-based medical image registration literature have been published (19 – 22), there are still some de fi ciencies.”
BackgroundTowards realtime multimodal fusion for image-guided interventions using self-similarities
Heinrich, M. P., Jenkinson, M., Papież, B. W., Brady, S. M., & Schnabel, J. A. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40811-3_24 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Pulmonary CT Registration Through Supervised Learning With Convolutional Neural Networks
Eppenhof, K. A. J., & Pluim, J. P. W. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2018.2878316 · Cited by 173 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(88) Synthetic DVF Lung CT 3D CNN TRE TMI 2018”
BackgroundSpatiotemporal motion estimation for respiratory‐correlated imaging of the lungs
Vandemeulebroucke, J., Rit, S., Kybic, J., Clarysse, P., & Sarrut, D. (2010) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.3523619 · Cited by 172 · cited 1× · see citing works
“POPI (43) CBCT Lung 3D 6 2011 Normal 100 landmarks”
BackgroundDeformable image registration in radiation therapy
Oh, S., & Kim, S. (2017) · Radiation Oncology Journal · doi:10.3857/roj.2017.00325 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Jiménez–del–Toro, O. A., Müller, H., Krenn, M., Gruenberg, K., Taha, A. A., Winterstein, M., Eggel, I., Foncubierta–Rodríguez, A., Göksel, O., András, J., et al. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2578680 · Cited by 160 · cited 1× · see citing works
“VISCERAL (51) CT, MRI Whole Body 3D More than 120 Since 2016 Unknown Whole body”
BackgroundDeepAtlas: Joint Semi-supervised Learning of Image Registration and Segmentation
Xu, Z., & Niethammer, M. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_47 · Cited by 160 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Therefore, this weakly supervised paradigm is applicable in medical image segmentation, such as the DeepAtlas described in (135) and the method (144).”
BackgroundMethodDeformable image registration for radiation therapy: principle, methods, applications and evaluation
Rigaud, B., Simon, A., Castelli, J., Lafond, C., Acosta, O., Haigron, P., Cazoulat, G., & de Crevoisier, R. (2019) · Acta Oncologica · doi:10.1080/0284186x.2019.1620331 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Pluim, J. P. W., & Fitzpatrick, J. M. (2003) · PubMed · doi:10.1109/tmi.2003.819272 · Cited by 151 · cited 1× · see citing works
“According to the type of the transformation, it can be categorized as rigid, affine, and deformable registration (2).”
BackgroundHyperMorph: Amortized Hyperparameter Learning for Image Registration
Hoopes, A., Hoffmann, M., Fischl, B. R., Guttag, J. V., & Dalca, A. V. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78191-0_1 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
XMorpher: Full Transformer for Deformable Medical Image Registration via Cross Attention
Shi, J., He, Y., Kong, Y., Coatrieux, J.-L., Shu, H., Yang, G., & Li, S. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16446-0_21 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Unsupervised Deep Feature Learning for Deformable Registration of MR Brain Images
Wu, G., Kim, M., Wang, Q., Gao, Y., Liao, S., & Shen, D. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_80 · Cited by 149 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(56) firstly proposed to adopt deep learning technology to obtain the similarity metric for registration.”
BackgroundLabel-driven weakly-supervised learning for multimodal deformarle image registration
Hu, Y., Marc Modat, A., Gibson, E., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., Noble, J. A., Barratt, D. C., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2018) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2018.8363756 · Cited by 148 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(130) Anatomical labels Prostate MRI-US 3D CNN DSC ISBI 2018”
BackgroundViT-V-Net: Vision Transformer for Unsupervised Volumetric Medical Image RegistrationPreprint
Chen, J., He, Y., Frey, E. C., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.06468 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Networks for Joint Affine and Non-Parametric Image Registration
Shen, Z., Xu, H., Xu, Z., & Niethammer, M. (2019) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2019.00435 · Cited by 130 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(98) designed a three-phase unsupervised registration framework to calculate a transformation map for knee MRI images in a longitudinal study.”
BackgroundFast Predictive Image Registration
Yang, X., Kwitt, R., & Niethammer, M. (2016) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46976-8_6 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Deep Learning Based Inter-modality Image Registration Supervised by Intra-modality Similarity
Cao, X., Yang, J., Wang, L., Xue, Z., Wang, Q., & Shen, D. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00919-9_7 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Xiao, Y., Fortin, M., Unsgård, G., Rivaz, H. J., & Reinertsen, I. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12268 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Tam, A. L., Lim, H. J., Wistuba, I. I., Tamrazi, A., Kuo, M. D., Ziv, E., Wong, S. T. C., Shih, A. J., Webster, R. J., III, Fischer, G. S., et al. (2015) · Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2015.10.019 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
DiCyc: GAN-based deformation invariant cross-domain information fusion for medical image synthesis
Wang, C., Yang, G., Papanastasiou, G., Tsaftaris, S. A., Newby, D. E., Gray, C. D., Macnaught, G., & MacGillivray, T. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.015 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Progression parameters for emphysema: A clinical investigation
Stolk, J. N., Putter, H., Bakker, E. M., et al. (2007) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2007.04.016 · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SPREAD (44) CT Lung Unknown 144 2007 COPD Longitudinal design in 30 months”
MethodTraining cnns for image registration from few samples with model-based data augmentation
Uzunova, H., Wilms, M., Handels, H., & Ehrhardt, J. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_26 · Cited by 110 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(78) designed a network for the registration between 2D brain MRI and 2D cardiac MRI.”
BackgroundDiffuseMorph: Unsupervised Deformable Image Registration Using Diffusion Model
Kim, B., Han, I., & Ye, J. C. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19821-2_20 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Eckstein, F., Kwoh, C. K., & Link, T. M. (2014) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205310 · Cited by 100 · cited 2× · see citing works
“OAI as the example in the knee dataset contains MRI and x-ray longitudinal measurements from 4,796 subjects, and more than 400 research manuscripts have used the OAI to explore the assessments and interventions of knee osteoarthritis (48).”
BackgroundAdversarial Image Registration with Application for MR and TRUS Image Fusion
Yan, P., Xu, S., Rastinehad, A. R., & Wood, B. J. (2018) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00919-9_23 · Cited by 100 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(115) GAN-loss Prostate MR-TRUS 3D Wasserstein GAN TRE, D-score MLMI 2018”
Error Corrective Boosting for Learning Fully Convolutional Networks with Limited Data
Roy, A. G., Conjeti, S., Sheet, D., Katouzian, A., Navab, N., & Wachinger, C. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_27 · Cited by 95 · cited 1× · see citing works
“IXI (41) MRI Brain 3D 662 2014 Normal Include T1, T2, PD, MRA and DTI images”
Jiang, Z., Yin, F.-F., Ge, Y., & Ren, L. (2019) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ab5da0 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Shao, W., Banh, L., Kunder, C. A., Fan, R. E., Soerensen, S. J. C., Wang, J. B., Teslovich, N. C., Madhuripan, N., Jawahar, A., Ghanouni, P., et al. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101919 · Cited by 94 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(100) MSE Prostate MR-Histology 4D CNN TRE, Dice MIA 2021”
CNN-based lung CT registration with multiple anatomical constraints
Hering, A., Häger, S., Moltz, J. H., Leßmann, N., Heldmann, S., & van Ginneken, B. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102139 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Multimodal image registration with deep context reinforcement learning
Ma, K., Wang, J., Singh, V., Tamersoy, B., Chang, Y.-J., Wimmer, A., & Chen, T. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_28 · Cited by 87 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(71) adopted deep reinforcement learning to extract the best feature representation to minimize the discrepancy between CT and MRI images for rigid registration.”
BackgroundImage-and-Spatial Transformer Networks for Structure-Guided Image Registration
Lee, M. C. H., Oktay, O., Schuh, A., Schaap, M., & Glocker, B. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32245-8_38 · Cited by 87 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(138) Anatomical labels Brain MRI 3D CNN DSC, ASD MICCAI 2019”
Detection of Vertebral Body Fractures Based on Cortical Shell Unwrapping
Yao, J., Burns, J. E., Munoz, H. E., et al. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-33454-2_63 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“SpineWeb (53) MRI, CT Spine 3D Multiple in 16 datasets Since 2012 Spinal injury Detect vertebral body fractures”
BackgroundAdversarial Deformation Regularization for Training Image Registration Neural Networks
Hu, Y., Gibson, E., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., Vercauteren, T. K., Noble, J. A., & Barratt, D. C. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_87 · Cited by 85 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(131) Biomechanical Simulations Prostate MRI-US 3D GAN DSC, TRE MICCAI 2018”
BackgroundUnsupervised Deformable Image Registration Using Cycle-Consistent CNN
Kim, B., Kim, J., Lee, J., Kim, D. H., Park, S. H., & Ye, J. C. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_19 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Huang, W., Yang, H., Liu, X., Li, C., Zhang, I., Wang, R., Zheng, H., & Wang, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2021.3059282 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Adversarial deformation regularization for training image registration neural networks
Hu, Y., Gibson, E., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., Vercauteren, T. K., Noble, J., & Barratt, D. (2018) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 80 · see citing works
A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods
Xiao, H., Teng, X., Liu, C., Li, T., Ren, G., Yang, R., Shen, D., & Cai, J. (2021) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-21-175 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Lv, J., Yang, M. Y., Zhang, J., & Wang, X. (2017) · British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20170788 · Cited by 76 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(89) Real DVF Abdomen MRI 3D CNN SNR BJR 2018”
BackgroundFu, Y., Lei, Y., Wang, T., Patel, P., Jani, A. B., Mao, H., Curran, W. J., Liu, T., & Yang, X. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101845 · Cited by 75 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(75) designed an MR-TRUS registration network for prostate interventions; the supervision deformation field is generated from population-based FE models from point clouds with biomechanical constraints.”
BackgroundMethodCross-Modal Attention for MRI and Ultrasound Volume Registration
Song, X., Guo, H., Xu, X., Chao, H., Xu, S., Türkbey, B., Wood, B. J., Wang, G., & Yan, P. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_7 · Cited by 75 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(146) Attention Prostate MRI-US 3D SRE MICCAI 2021”
BackgroundJoint Registration And Segmentation Of Xray Images Using Generative Adversarial Networks
Mahapatra, D., Ge, Z., Sedai, S., & Chakravorty, R. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00919-9_9 · Cited by 73 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(128) Segmentations Lung X-ray 2D GAN DSC, HD, TRE MLMI 2018”
BackgroundU-ReSNet: Ultimate Coupling of Registration and Segmentation with Deep Nets
Estienne, T., Vakalopoulou, M., Christodoulidis, S., Battistella, E., Lerousseau, M., Carré, A., Klausner, G., Sun, R., Robert, C., Mougiakakou, S. G., et al. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32248-9_35 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(95) MSE, NCC Brain MRI 3D CNN DSC MICCAI 2019”
BackgroundA Systematic Collection of Medical Image Datasets for Deep Learning
Li, J., Zhu, G., Hua, C., Feng, M., Bennamoun, B., Li, P., Lu, X., Song, J., Shen, P., Xu, X., et al. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3615862 · Cited by 72 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, accessing medical data is not allowed for most researchers since the clinical data contain private information and only researchers with authorization could utilize the dataset (25).”
BackgroundmlVIRNET: Multilevel Variational Image Registration Network
Hering, A., van Ginneken, B., & Heldmann, S. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32226-7_29 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(136) Contours Lung CT 3D CNN DSC MICCAI 2019”
BackgroundYoo, I., Hildebrand, D. G. C., Tobin, W. F., Lee, W.-C. A., & Jeong, W. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9_29 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Adversarial Uni- and Multi-modal Stream Networks for Multimodal Image Registration
Xu, Z., Luo, J., Yan, J., Pulya, R., Li, X., Wells, W. M., & Jayender, J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-59716-0_22 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Learning Dual Transformer Network for Diffeomorphic Registration
Zhang, Y., Pei, Y., & Zha, H. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_13 · Cited by 67 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(145) Transformer Brain MRI 3D DSC MICCAI 2021”
BackgroundHan, R., Jones, C. K., Lee, J., Wu, P., Vagdargi, P., Uneri, A., Helm, P. A., Luciano, M., Anderson, W. S., & Siewerdsen, J. H. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102292 · Cited by 66 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(123) NCC Head MRI-CT 3D cycGAN Dice, SD, HD, TRE, [J], Time MIA 2022”
Contrastive Registration for Unsupervised Medical Image Segmentation
Liu, L., Avilés-Rivero, A. I., & Schönlieb, C. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2023.3332003 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
A systematic collection of medical image datasets for deep learning
Li, J., Zhu, G., Hua, C., Feng, M., BasheerBennamoun, Li, P., Lu, X., Song, J., Shen, P., Xu, X., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.12864 · Cited by 61 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Finally, accessing medical data is not allowed for most researchers since the clinical data contain private information and only researchers with authorization could utilize the dataset (25).”
BackgroundSchnabel, J. A., Heinrich, M. P., Papież, B. W., & Brady, S. J. M. (2016) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2016.06.031 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Their computational performance, however, is hampered by the high dimension and non-convex properties, and their capability to capture complex deformations is limited (18).”
BackgroundEppenhof, K. A. J., & Pluim, J. P. W. (2018) · Journal of medical imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.5.2.024003 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Hering, A., Kuckertz, S., Heldmann, S., & Heinrich, M. P. (2019) · Informatik aktuell · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-25326-4_69 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Monomodal image registration using mutual information based methods
Gao, Z., Gu, B., & Lin, J. (2006) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2006.08.002 · Cited by 55 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this scenario, image registration is used to monitor organ or lesion variation (4).”
MethodLabel-driven weakly-supervised learning for multimodal deformable image registration
Hu, Y., Marc Modat, A., Gibson, E., Ghavami, N., Bonmati, E., Moore, C. M., Emberton, M., Noble, J. A., Barratt, D. C., & Vercauteren, T. K. (2017) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1711.01666 · Cited by 50 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(130) Anatomical labels Prostate MRI-US 3D CNN DSC ISBI 2018”
BackgroundSokooti, H., de Vos, B. D., Berendsen, F. F., Ghafoorian, M., Yousefi, S., Lelieveldt, B. P. F., Išgum, I., & Staring, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.10235 · Cited by 47 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(90) Synthetic DVF Lung CT 3D CNN TRE, folding, [J] arXiv 2019”
MethodGenerative Adversarial Networks for MR-CT Deformable Image RegistrationPreprint
Tanner, C., Özdemir, F., Profanter, R., Vishnevskiy, V., Ender Konukoglu, A., & Göksel, O. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.07349 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(114) cycloss Thorax, Abdomen MR-CT 3D cycGAN NMI, MIND CVPR 2018”
BackgroundSinclair, M. D., Schuh, A., Hahn, K., Petersen, K., Bai, Y., Batten, J., Schaap, M., & Glocker, B. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102383 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(153) Transformer Cardiac CT 3D DSC, ASD HD MIA 2022”
MethodMRI-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: initial clinical experience
Chen, A. M., Hsu, S., Lamb, J., et al. (2017) · Clinical & Translational Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12094-017-1704-4 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Generative Adversarial Registration for Improved Conditional Deformable Templates
Dey, N., Ren, M., Dalca, A. V., & Gerig, G. (2021) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00390 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(122) LNCC Brain MRI 3D GAN Dice, [J] ICCV 2021”
BackgroundMedical Image Registration Based on Uncoupled Learning and Accumulative Enhancement
Shu, Y., Wang, H., Xiao, B., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_1 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Wu, Y., Jiahao, T. Z., Wang, J., Yushkevich, P. A., Hsieh, M. A., & Gee, J. C. (2022) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.02014 · Cited by 41 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(156) Neural ODE Brain MRI 3D DSC CVPR 2022”
BackgroundDeep deformable registration: Enhancing accuracy by fully convolutional neural net
Ghosal, S., & Ray, N. (2017) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2017.05.022 · Cited by 38 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(62) Brain MRI 3D CNN SSIM, PSNR PRL 2017”
BackgroundDeformer: Towards Displacement Field Learning for Unsupervised Medical Image Registration
Chen, J., Lu, D., Zhang, Y., Wei, D., Ning, M., Shi, X., Xu, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16446-0_14 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Implicit Neural Representations for Deformable Image Registration
Wolterink, J. M., Zwienenberg, J., & Brune, C. I. 0.-0.-0.-5. (2022) · University of Twente Research Information · Cited by 38 · see citing works
So, R. W. K., & Chung, A. C. S. (2017) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2016.09.004 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(57) proposed a novel learning-based metric by using Bhattacharyya Distances.”
BackgroundDeep adaptive registration of multi-modal prostate images
Guo, H., Kruger, M., Xu, S., Wood, B. J., & Yan, P. (2020) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2020.101769 · Cited by 36 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(91) Synthetic DVF Prostate MRI-US 3D CNN SRE CMIG 2020”
BackgroundLiu, X., Jiang, D., Wang, M., & Song, Z. (2018) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-018-1924-y · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Light-Weight Deformable Registration Using Adversarial Learning With Distilling Knowledge
Tran, M. Q., Do, T., Tran, H., Tjiputra, E., Tran, Q. D., & Nguyen, A. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3141013 · Cited by 33 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(155) Knowledge distillation Liver, Brain CT, MRI 3D DSC, [J] TMI 2022”
BackgroundLi, B. H., Niessen, W. J., Klein, S., de Groot, M., Ikram, M. A., Vernooij, M. W., & Bron, E. E. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32248-9_72 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Registration of Pathological Images
Yang, X., Han, X., Park, E., Aylward, S., Kwitt, R., & Niethammer, M. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46630-9_10 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Image registration: Maximum likelihood, minimum entropy and deep learning
Sedghi, A., O’Donnell, L. J., Kapur, T., Miller, E. G., Mousavi, P., & Wells, W. M. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101939 · Cited by 30 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(67) Brain MRI 3D CNN TRE, DSC MIA 2021”
BackgroundPCANet-Based Structural Representation for Nonrigid Multimodal Medical Image Registration
Zhu, X., Ding, M., Huang, T., Jin, X., & Zhang, X. (2018) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s18051477 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(63) Brain T1–T2, T1–PD 3D CNN TRE Sensors 2018”
BackgroundWeakly Supervised Learning of Metric Aggregations for Deformable Image Registration
Ferrante, E., Dokania, P. K., Silva, R. M., & Nikos Paragios, A. (2018) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2018.2869700 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(64) Brain, Abdomen MRI, CT 3D CNN DSC JBHI 2018”
BackgroundFast predictive multimodal image registration
Yang, X., Kwitt, R., Styner, M. A., & Niethammer, M. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi.2017.7950652 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(81) Real DVF Brain T1–T2 3D CNN Deformation error, [J] ISBI 2017”
BackgroundNon-rigid Craniofacial 2D-3D Registration Using CNN-Based Regression
Pei, Y., Zhang, Y., Qin, H., Ma, G., Guo, Y., Xu, T., & Zha, H. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9_14 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
End-to-end Ultrasound Frame to Volume Registration
Guo, H., Xu, X., Xu, S., Wood, B. J., & Yan, P. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_6 · Cited by 25 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(102) MSE, NCC Prostate US-MRI 2D-3D CNN DSC, HD MICCAI 2021”
BackgroundMethodA Deep Discontinuity-Preserving Image Registration Network
Chen, X., Xia, Y., Ravikumar, N., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_5 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Uncertainty Learning towards Unsupervised Deformable Medical Image Registration
Gong, X., Khaidem, L., Zhu, W., Zhang, B., & Doermann, D. (2022) · IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00162 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(107) NLCC Hippocampus, Prostate MRI 3D CNN MSE, NLCC, DSC WACV 2022”
BackgroundRespiratory deformation registration in 4D-CT/cone beam CT using deep learning
Teng, X., Chen, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2020) · Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.21037/qims-19-1058 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(93) Real DVF Lung CT 3D CNN MSE, SSIM QIMS 2021”
MethodDeformable image registration for cone-beam CT guided transoral robotic base-of-tongue surgery
Reaungamornrat, S., Liu, W. P., Wang, A., et al. (2013) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/0031-9155/58/14/4951 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Deep Adaptive Log-Demons: Diffeomorphic Image Registration with Very Large Deformations
Zhao, L., & Jia, K. (2015) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2015/836202 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(58) Lung, Brain Synthetic 2D, 3D CNN Convergence time CMMM 2015”
BackgroundJoint affine and deformable three‐dimensional networks for brain MRI registration
Zhu, Z., Cao, Y., Qin, C., Rao, Y., Lin, D., Dou, Q., Ni, D., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.14674 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(139) Segmentations Brain MRI 3D CNN DSC, HD, ASSD Med Phys 2021”
BackgroundWeakly Supervised Registration of Prostate MRI and Histopathology Images
Shao, W., Bhattacharya, I., Soerensen, S. J. C., Kunder, C. A., Wang, J. B., Fan, R. E., Ghanouni, P., Brooks, J. D., Sonn, G. A., & Rusu, M. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_10 · Cited by 21 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(127) implemented this similar coarse-to-fine registration strategy in prostate MRI images named ProsRegNet.”
BackgroundMulti-scale Neural ODEs for 3D Medical Image Registration
Xu, J., Chen, E. Z., Chen, X., Chen, T., & Sun, S. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_21 · Cited by 21 · cited 3× · see citing works
“(104) Similarity loss Brain T1, T2, FLAIR 3D CNN DSC, RMSE MICCAI 2021”
BackgroundInfluentialXu, Z., Luo, J., Lu, D., Yan, J., Frisken, S. F., Jayender, J., Wells, W. M., Li, X., Zheng, Y., & Tong, R. K. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16446-0_2 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Meta-Learning Initializations for Interactive Medical Image Registration
Baum, Z. M. C., Hu, Y., & Barratt, D. C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2022.3218147 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Chen et al. (149) designed a ViT-V-Net for brain MRI image registration.”
MethodCycle-Consistent Training for Reducing Negative Jacobian Determinant in Deep Registration Networks
Kuang, D. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32778-1_13 · Cited by 20 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(96) CC Brain MRI 3D CNN DSC SASHIMI 2019”
BackgroundSynthetic CT-aided MRI-CT image registration for head and neck radiotherapy
Fu, Y., Lei, Y., Zhou, J., et al. (2020) · SPIE Medical Imaging: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging · doi:10.1117/12.2549092 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Espinel, Y., Calvet, L., Botros, K., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-022-02774-1 · Cited by 19 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(143) Boundaries Liver CT-Laparoscopic 3D-2D CNN TRE MICCAI 2021”
BackgroundPredicting Respiratory Motion for Real-Time Tumour Tracking in Radiotherapy
Krilavicius, T., Zliobaite, I., Simonavicius, H., & Jaruevicius, L. (2016) · 2016 IEEE 29th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS) · doi:10.1109/cbms.2016.52 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, registration is also of great significance in radiotherapy (11, 12); it is performed to calculate the offset of the current target from the planned position, and the offset determined from the registration is used to adjust the patient position or the radiation beam.”
BackgroundDeformable adversarial registration network with multiple loss constraints
Luo, Y. P., Cao, W., He, Z., Zou, W., & He, Z. (2021) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2021.101931 · Cited by 15 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(124) NCC Lung CT 2D GAN Dice, HD, ASSD, [J] CMIG 2021”
BackgroundEspinel, Y., Calvet, L., Botros, K., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_63 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
GAN Based Medical Image RegistrationPreprint
Mahapatra, D. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.02369 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Lu, Y., Li, B., Liu, N., Chen, J., Xiao, L., Gou, S., Chen, L., Huang, M., & Zhuang, J. (2020) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2020/4942121 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(118) cycloss Cardiac CT-TEE 2D cycGAN DR, HD95, ASD CMMM 2020”
BackgroundWeakly Supervised Learning of Metric Aggregations for Deformable Image Registration
Ferrante, E., Dokania, P. K., Silva, R. M., & Nikos Paragios, A. (2019) · Conicet · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Deep Learning Based Registration Using Spatial Gradients and Noisy Segmentation Labels
Estienne, T., Vakalopoulou, M., Battistella, E., Carré, A., Henry, T., Lerousseau, M., Robert, C., Nikos Paragios, A., & Deutsch, É. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-71827-5_11 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
A Meta-Learning Approach for Medical Image Registration
Park, H., Lee, G. M., Kim, S., Ryu, G. H., Jeong, A., Sagong, M., & Park, S. H. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi52829.2022.9761512 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(148) Meta learning Brain MRI 3D Distance, NCC arXiv 2021”
BackgroundPei, Y., Chen, L., Zhao, F., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87234-2_23 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(120) NCC Brain MRI 3D GAN DSC, HD, ASD, CC MICCAI 2021”
BackgroundA Deep Network for Joint Registration and Parcellation of Cortical Surfaces
Zhao, F., Wu, Z., Wang, L., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_17 · Cited by 13 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Therefore, this weakly supervised paradigm is applicable in medical image segmentation, such as the DeepAtlas described in (135) and the method (144).”
MethodContrastive Registration for Unsupervised Medical Image SegmentationPreprint
Liu, L., Avilés-Rivero, A. I., & Schönlieb, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.08894 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
(2015) · PubMed · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Diffeomorphic Lung Registration Using Deep CNNs and Reinforced Learning
Onieva, J. O., Martí-Fuster, B., de la Puente, M. P., & Estépar, R. S. J. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-00946-5_28 · Cited by 10 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(87) Real DVF Lung CT 3D CNN TRE IAMO 2018”
BackgroundInfant Brain Deformable Registration Using Global and Local Label-Driven Deep Regression Learning
Hu, S., Zhang, L., Li, G., Liu, M., Fu, D., & Zhang, W. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-32692-0_13 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(133) Anatomical labels Brain MRI 3D CNN DSC MLMI 2019”
BackgroundA multi-scale unsupervised learning for deformable image registration
Shao, S., Pei, Z., Chen, W., Zhu, W., Wu, X., & Zhang, B. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-021-02511-0 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(108) MSE Porcine Endoscopic 3D CNN MSE, NLCC, [J] IJCARS 2022”
MethodUnimodal Cyclic Regularization For Training Multimodal Image Registration Networks
Xu, Z., Yan, J., Luo, J., Wells, W. M., Li, X., & Jayender, J. (2021) · IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) · doi:10.1109/isbi48211.2021.9433926 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(110) MIND Abdominal CT-MR 3D CNN Dice, ASD ISBI 2021”
Construction of Longitudinally Consistent 4D Infant Cerebellum Atlases Based on Deep Learning
Chen, L., Wu, Z., Hu, D., Pei, Y., Zhao, F., Sun, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, W., Wang, L., Li, G., et al. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_14 · Cited by 7 · cited 2× · see citing works
“(105) extended this registration framework to infant tasks.”
BackgroundMRI to CT Synthesis Using Contrastive Learning
Jiangtao, W., Wu, X., Xiao, J., et al. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Medical Imaging Physics and Engineering (ICMIPE) · doi:10.1109/icmipe53131.2021.9698888 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(166) developed a network to generate pseudo-CT fromMRI for brain radiotherapy based on a contrastive unpaired translation network (CUT) (167).”
Background4D-CBCT Registration with a FBCT-derived Plug-and-Play Feasibility Regularizer
Sang, Y., & Ruan, D. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87202-1_11 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ha, I. Y., Hansen, L., Wilms, M., et al. (2019) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
DiffuseMorph: Unsupervised Deformable Image Registration Using Diffusion ModelPreprint
Kim, B., Han, I., & Ye, J. C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.05149 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
F3RNet: Full-Resolution Residual Registration Network for Multimodal Image Registration
Xu, Z., Luo, J., Yan, J., Li, X., & Jayender, J. (2020) · PubMed Central · doi:10.1007/s11548-021-02359-4 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(112) MIND Abdominal CT-MR 3D CNN Dice, ASD, [J] IJCARS 2021”
Synth-by-Reg (SbR): Contrastive Learning for Synthesis-Based Registration of Paired Images
Casamitjana, A., Mancini, M., & Iglesias, J. E. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87592-3_5 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(152) Contrastive learning Brain MRI 3D Landmark error SSMI 2021”
BackgroundLiu, L., & Wang, H. (2022) · International Conference on Intelligent Medicine and Image Processing (IMIP) · doi:10.1145/3524086.3524092 · Cited by 2 · cited 1× · see citing works
“(154) Transformer Torso PET-CT 2D-3D IOU, CPE IMIP 2022”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
31 of the 206 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Jaderberg, 2015, Spatial transformer networks
- Vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 30
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, J., Liu, Y., Wei, S., Bian, Z., Subramanian, S., Carass, A., Prince, J. L., & Du, Y. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103385 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Galić, I., Habijan, M., Leventić, H., & Romić, K. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12214411 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Nenoff, L., Amstutz, F., Murr, M., Archibald‐Heeren, B. R., Fusella, M., Hussein, M., Lechner, W., Zhang, Y., Sharp, G., & Osorio, E. M. V. (2023) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ad0d8a · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Correlation-aware Coarse-to-fine MLPs for Deformable Medical Image Registration
Meng, M., Feng, D. D., Bi, L., & Kim, J. (2024) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.00921 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
“Recently, deep registration methods based on Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) or transformers have been widely used to perform fast end-to-end registration [3, 6].”
BackgroundMethodMedical image registration in the era of Transformers: A recent review
Ramadan, H., Bourakadi, D. E., Yahyaouy, A., & Tairi, H. (2024) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2024.101540 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Cao, Y., Cao, W., Wang, Z., Yuan, G., Li, Z., Ni, X., & Zheng, J. (2024) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106476 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Zhou, H., Liu, S., & Hu, S. (2025) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103293 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
CartiMorph: A framework for automated knee articular cartilage morphometrics
Yao, Y., Zhong, J., Zhang, L., Khan, S., & Chen, W. (2023) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2023.103035 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Recently, supervised and unsupervised deep learning methods have shown comparable or better performance than conventional methods while being orders of magnitude faster [58, 59].”
BackgroundZhuo, Y., & Shen, Y. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72069-7_56 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Deformable image registration aims to precisely align anatomical structures across images from different modalities or capture times [1, 8, 21].”
BackgroundEmpowering brain cancer diagnosis: harnessing artificial intelligence for advanced imaging insights
Al-Kadi, O. S., Al-Emaryeen, R., Al-Nahhas, S., Almallahi, I., Braik, R., & Mahafza, W. S. (2024) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro-2023-0115 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound for Gallbladder Disease Diagnosis
Takahashi, K., Ozawa, E., Shimakura, A., Mori, T., Miyaaki, H., & Nakao, K. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14040374 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Indirect deformable image registration using synthetic image generated by unsupervised deep learning
Hémon, C., Texier, B., Chourak, H., Simon, A., Bessières, I., de Crevoisier, R., Castelli, J., Lafond, C., Barateau, A., & Nunes, J. (2024) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2024.105143 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Lu, J., Jin, R., & Song, E. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences · doi:10.1109/trpms.2024.3410021 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Recently, the emergence of deep learning-based registration methods [10], [11], [12] has provided innovative ideas for achieving real-time registration, representing a new direction that surpasses traditional iterative methods [13].”
BackgroundVisTA-SR: Improving the Accuracy and Resolution of Low-Cost Thermal Imaging Cameras for Agriculture
Yun, H., Lô, S., Diepenbrock, C., et al. (2024) · IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW) · doi:10.1109/cvprw63382.2024.00556 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“We tested deep-learning based image registration methods such as Spatial Transformer Networks [19] and Deformable Field-based approaches [35].”
MethodGarzia, S., Capellini, K., Gasparotti, E., Pizzuto, D., Spinelli, G., Berti, S. L., Positano, V., & Celi, S. (2024) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s24041072 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Over the past few years, a large number of works have been published on medical image registration, differing in the type of images and strategies applied [17,18].”
BackgroundA Physics-Informed Deep Learning Deformable Medical Image Registration Method Based on Neural ODEs
Amiri-Hezaveh, A., Tan, S., Deng, Q., Umulis, D. M., Cunniff, L., Weickenmeier, J., & Tepole, A. B. (2025) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-025-02476-6 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“In the case of similarity-based unsupervised methods (Zou et al., 2022), the transformation is a neural network whose parame-tersaredeterminedfromtheminimizationofthelossfunction that consists of similarity measure and regularization term.”
CortexMorph: Fast Cortical Thickness Estimation via Diffeomorphic Registration Using VoxelMorph
McKinley, R., & Rummel, C. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43999-5_69 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Taasti, V. T., Hattu, D., Berbée, M., Ruysscher, D. D., & Canters, R. A. M. (2025) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.18037 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“50,51 This might overcome some of the issues with boundary conditions which are now faced.”
Deep Learning in Image Processing: Part 2—Image Enhancement, Reconstruction and Registration
Pauwels, R., & Iosifidis, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43827-1_18 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Wang, D., Azadvar, S., Heiselman, J. S., Jiang, X., Miga, M. I., & Wang, L. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72089-5_34 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Pezzino, S., Luca, T., Castorina, M., Puleo, S., & Castorina, S. (2025) · Progress in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1088/2516-1091/adc85e · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Quantitative use of cone-beam computed tomography in proton therapy: challenges and opportunities
Ghaznavi, H., Maraghechi, B., Zhang, H., Zhu, T., Laugeman, E., Zhang, T., Zhao, T., Mazur, T. R., & Darafsheh, A. (2025) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/adc86c · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Ahi, K., Wu, S., Sriram, S., & Fenger, G. (2025) · 2025 36th Annual SEMI Advanced Semiconductor Manufacturing Conference (ASMC) · doi:10.1109/asmc64512.2025.11010527 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
TCDE-Net: An unsupervised dual-encoder network for 3D brain medical image registration
Yang, X. N., Li, D., Deng, L., et al. (2025) · Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics · doi:10.1016/j.compmedimag.2025.102527 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Im, J. E., Khalifa, M., Gregory, A., Erickson, B. J., & Kline, T. L. (2024) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-024-01333-1 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Instead of learning the transformations from a reference standard, the unsupervised model is optimized with a loss function to minimize the dissimilarity between the fixed image and the warped moving image [3, 4, 13].”
Saito, M. (2023) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.16353 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Zou, J., Liu, J., Choi, K., & Qin, J. (2023) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering10050562 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citationWei, H., Wei, C., Feng, Y., Yan, W., Yu, Y., Chen, Y., Yin, X., Li, J., & Zhang, H. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.108107 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
On-the-Fly Guidance Training for Medical Image Registration
Xin, Y., Chen, Y.-C., Ji, S., Han, K., & Xie, X. S. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-72069-7_65 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“Recent advancements have demonstrated that learning-based methods are gradually surpassing traditional optimization-based methods [2, 3, 10, 18, 19, 32, 49] in terms of performance and efficiency [14, 30, 39, 54].”
BackgroundDeep neural networks to register and annotate cells in moving and deforming nervous systems
Atanas, A. A., Lu, A. K.-Y., Goodell, B., Kim, J., Baskoylu, S., Kang, D., Kramer, T. S., Bueno, E., Wan, F. K., Cunningham, K. L., et al. (2026) · eLife · doi:10.1101/2024.07.18.601886 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
DNN-Reg: A Deep Neural Network for Brain Hemorrhage Deformed CT Image Registration
Saha, S., & Dutta, S. (2025) · International Conference on Computing, Intelligence, and Application (CIACON) · doi:10.1109/ciacon65473.2025.11189681 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Recent deep learning approaches [4] have significantly improved registration accuracy, and current research efforts classify these methods into various categories—such as supervised, unsupervised, and weakly supervised—while also highlighting ongoing challenges and future directions.”
Artificial Intelligence in Image Assisted Radiation Oncology
Wang, H., Zhao, Y., Chen, X., McDonald, B. A., Li, Y., Xie, J., Rhee, D. J., Lim, T. Y., Netherton, T., Phan, J., et al. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18111715 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“…tool to mitigate setup uncertainty by aligning on-board images (e.g., daily cone-beam CT or planar X-rays) with the planning CT. CNN-based DIR networks, such as VoxelMorph-style models [136], can learn to predict the spatial transformation that maps daily imaging to the planning anatomy [137].”
Respiratory motion-corrected T1 mapping of the abdomen
Zhang, J. H., Neumann, T., Schaeffter, T., et al. (2024) · Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10334-024-01196-1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
H-UDMIR: A Hybrid Unsupervised Deep Learning Framework for Deformable Medical Image Registration
Balaha, H. M., Mahmoud, A. H., El‐Ghar, M. A., Ghazal, M. A., Contractor, S. G., & El-Baz, A. S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3562092 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Unsupervised methods, by learning directly from the raw images, potentially offer more unbiased and robust models [4], [24].”
InfluentialWei, C., Eze, C., Klaar, R., et al. (2025) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/ade8d0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Deep-learning-based deformable image registration of head CT and MRI scans
Ratke, A., Darsht, E., Heinzelmann, F., Kroeninger, K. A., Timmermann, B., & Bäumer, C. (2023) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1292437 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
CCAC: Contrastive Learning with Channel Attention and Contour Loss for Brain Image Registration
Zhang, Y., Shi, D., Wang, J., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10385656 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Medical images captured by different imaging devices exhibit variations in grayscale values [17].”
BackgroundOsman, A. F. I., Almugren, K. S., Tamam, N. M., & Shahine, B. H. (2024) · Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13014-024-02452-3 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Their capability for the deformable registration task has been increasingly investigated in different medical image modalities [6].”
BackgroundAhi, K., Sriram, S., Wu, S., & Fenger, G. L. (2025) · Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXVI · doi:10.1117/12.3059959 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Unsupervised Multimanifold Cross-Guided Diffusion Deformable Registration for Cardiac MRI
Zhao, Q., & Wang, X. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2025.3577483 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“These methods include multiscale registration algorithms [11], [12] and generative adversarial registration algorithms [13], [14].”
Pan, T., Thomas, M. A., Lü, Y., & Luo, D. (2025) · EJNMMI Physics · doi:10.1186/s40658-025-00797-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“They are computationally expensive, sensitive to image noise, and generally unreliable for the deformable registration of anatomical CT data to match with functional PET data in PET/CT [14].”
Tenderini, R., Pegolotti, L., Kong, F., Pagani, S., Regazzoni, F., Marsden, A. L., & Simone Deparis, A. (2025) · npj Biological Physics and Mechanics. · doi:10.1038/s44341-025-00029-z · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“Besides industrial and engineering applications, deformable registration nowadays plays a crucial role in several medical imaging tasks, such as multimodal image fusion, organ atlas creation, and monitoring of disease progression [4, 5].”
Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis for Personalized Medicine
Galić, I., & Habijan, M. (2023) · International Symposium ELMAR · doi:10.1109/elmar59410.2023.10253934 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Golestani, N., Wang, A., Moallem, G., Bean, G. R., & Rusu, M. (2024) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2024.103356 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Deep Learning-Based Flap Detection System Using Thermographic Images in Plastic Surgery
Danciu, R., Danciu, B. A., Vasiu, L.-S., et al. (2024) · Applied System Innovation · doi:10.3390/asi7060101 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Position-aware feature matching algorithm based non-rigid point cloud registration
Wang, R., Zhang, R., Zhang, R., et al. (2025) · Multimedia Systems · doi:10.1007/s00530-024-01657-6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“With the emergence of consumer-grade scanning technology and the continuous development of various point cloud extraction techniques, point cloud models have become the primary choice for representing three-dimensional objects and are widely applied in fields such as medicine [1].”
Xie, J., Shao, H., Li, Y., et al. (2025) · Physics in Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1088/1361-6560/addf0e · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Reparameterized Multi-scale Transformer for Deformable Retinal Image Registration
Nie, Q., Zhang, X., Chen, C., Zhang, Z., Hu, Y., & Liu, J. (2025) · Machine Intelligence Research · doi:10.1007/s11633-024-1525-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Ahi, K., Mansour, S., Wu, S., Fenger, G. L., Ayya, A. S., Opitz, J., Abidine, N. Z. E., Hatem, H., Essam, A., Dessouki, A. E., et al. (2025) · Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control XXXVI · doi:10.1117/12.3052252 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Unsupervised Deformable Ultrasound Image Registration and Its Application for Vessel Segmentation
Abhimanyu, F., Orekhov, A. L., Bal, A., Galeotti, J., & Choset, H. (2023) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros55552.2023.10341870 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“To overcome these difficulties, deep-learning methods have also been presented [15]–[17], but work on deep-learning methods for ultrasound-to-ultrasound registration is limited.”
BackgroundMethodYang, F., Xue, Z., Lu, H., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2024.3481010 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Only a few works have been proposed, all under an unsupervised framework, which commonly incorporates the image dissimilarity term in the loss function, lacking the use of the gold standard displacement field [35], [36], [37].”
Automatic MRI Lymph Node Annotation From CT Labels
Kundu, S., Iwahori, Y., Bhuyan, M. K., Bhatt, M., Kijsirikul, B., Wang, A., Ouchi, A., & Shimizu, Y. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3535219 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Collision Constraints and Diffeomorphisms: Dealing With Physics in Deformable Image Registration
Alscher, T., Petersen, J., Lauze, F., Erleben, K., & Darkner, S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3588760 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Practical applications for image registration in the medical field incorporate atlas creation [5], surgery image guidance [6], and image fusion [7], among others.”
Yu, J., Xiao, B., Wang, J., Mi, H., Wang, E., Huang, N., Zhou, Y., Zhang, D., Luo, F., Yang, L., et al. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251375870 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“22 Unsupervised learning methods do not require registration labels but may suffer from insuf fi cient accuracy due to the absence of explicit supervision signals.”
Hu, Y., Zhang, Q., Zhao, Z., Ding, X., Li, W., Yang, J., Sun, J., & Xu, L. X. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103844 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Iturriago-Salas, L. M., Mesa-Sarmiento, J. A., Castro-Cabrera, P. A., et al. (2025) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers14110466 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Förner, L., & Wendler, T. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09513-8_54 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Chetty, I. J., & Zhong, H. (2026) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2026.01.016 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Robust Medical Image Prediction via Adaptive Reconstruction: Bridging the Gap in Low-Quality Data
Singhal, P., & Singh, M. (2026) · Journal of Informatics and Web Engineering · doi:10.33093/jiwe.2026.5.1.1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Andaloussi, M. A., Zanmene, M. L., Lavigne, T., Lubrano, V., Urcun, S., François Hild, A., & Bordas, S. (2026) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2026.111991 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hybrid Unsupervised Deformable Image Registration for 4D CT Lung Image Intra-modalities
Iqbal, M. Z., Razzak, I., Qayyum, A., Khan, T. M., & Sowmya, A. (2023) · International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA) · doi:10.1109/dicta60407.2023.00067 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Overall, image registration techniques are evolving for various medical imaging applications [9], [20].”
BackgroundDeep neural networks to register and annotate cells in moving and deforming nervous systemsPreprint
Atanas, A. A., Lu, A. K.-Y., Goodell, B., Kim, J., Baskoylu, S., Kang, D., Kramer, T. S., Bueno, E., Wan, F. K., Cunningham, K. L., et al. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.108159 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Li, Y., Zhang, E., Ouyang, H., et al. (2024) · Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology · doi:10.1007/s42058-024-00136-1
“Current clinical applications of DL in orthopaedics primarily include key parameter measurements [9], lesion detection [10], auxiliary diagnosis [11, 12], image segmentation of anatomical structures [13, 14], and image registration [15, 16].”
A novel hybrid method for the registration of deformable medical images using common subregions
Alam, F., Rahman, S. U., & Ahmad, J. (2024) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-024-19262-0
PelviNet: A Collaborative Multi-agent Convolutional Network for Enhanced Pelvic Image Registration
Rguibi, Z., Hajami, A., Zitouni, D., et al. (2024) · Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10278-024-01249-w
Cross-Modality Medical Image Registration with Local-Global Spatial Correlation
Kundu, S., Iwahori, Y., Bhuyan, M. K., et al. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-78195-7_8
Dual decoder UNet with Contrastive learning for Brain Image Registration
Zhang, Y., Guo, S., Shi, D., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm62325.2024.10822591
“The UNet network is notable for its symmetrical encoder-decoder architecture, which shows excellent performance in image segmentation and registration tasks [10].”
Walter, A., Bauer, C. J., Yawson, A. K., et al. (2025) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · doi:10.1080/21681163.2025.2455752
“Recently, deep learning– based DIR algorithms have been developed to predict deformation fields (Balakrishnan et al. 2015), though they still experience issues with large deformations, non-constrained registration and typically require large computational overhead when training (Zou et al. 2022).”
Deep Neural Networks to Register and Annotate Cells in Moving and Deforming Nervous SystemsPreprint
Atanas, A. A., Lu, A. K.-Y., Goodell, B., Kim, J., Baskoylu, S., Kang, D., Kramer, T. S., Bueno, E., Wan, F. K., Cunningham, K. L., et al. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.108159.1
A multi-level features modeling network for cardiac motion estimation
Cai, Z., Lin, J., Wang, H., & Fu, C. M. (2025) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2025.109186
A Dual-Stream Mamba With Contrastive Representation for Multimodal Deformable Registration
Hu, Y., Xu, L. X., & Sun, J. (2025) · doi:10.1109/embc58623.2025.11253168
“Corresponding authors: Jianqi Sun e-mail: milesun@sjtu.edu.cn The deformable registration of liver images from MR and CT modalities presents several challenges[3].”
Hu, Y., Zhao, Z., Zhang, Q., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-04947-6_49
Valipour, Z., Rabbani, H., Vard, A., et al. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.108734
Lin, J., Zou, L., Gao, Y., et al. (2026) · Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express · doi:10.1088/2057-1976/ae3966
Qian, H., Zhang, T., & Wang, Y. (2025) · doi:10.1145/3784929.3784935
Design of a Joint Adaptive Network for Multi-modal Image Registration and Segmentation
Kaur, H., Kumar, N., & Singh, G. (2025) · doi:10.1109/incowoco68239.2025.11407247
“Furthermore, artificial intelligence-based methods may exhibit more resilience since they aren't as concerned with regional optima that can be avoided since saddle positions frequently have zero gradients [6].”
Pan, T., & Luo, D. (2026) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.70380
“8,9 One promising AIR is a convolutional neural network (CNN) trained in a supervised fashion using simulated inter-image motion.”
Evaluation of Deformable Medical Image Registration Techniques for Improved Analysis
Ramola, A. S., & Kaur, P. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Interdisciplinary Approaches in Technology and Management for Social Innovation (IATMSI) · doi:10.1109/iatmsi68868.2026.11466033
“DMIR aligns medical images that differ due to anatomical variability, patient motion, or acquisition differences [1].”
InfluentialDirection-aware deformable registration for respiratory motion correction in PET/CT imaging
Zhou, H., He, L., Wang, S., Wu, Z., & He, J. (2026) · Radiography · doi:10.1016/j.radi.2026.103428
Wang, J., Tu, Y., Chen, Y., Luo, L., Xie, H., & Tang, Q. (2026) · Brachytherapy · doi:10.1016/j.brachy.2026.04.012
Zhang, F. (2026) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.260465
ARF: A parameter-efficient auxiliary framework for VFM-based medical image registration
Wang, H., Zhou, Q., Wu, J., Yao, F., Wang, Z., Lin, Q., Wu, C., & Pan, Z. (2026) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2026.114284
Data-driven registration and modeling of brain deformation for image-guided neurosurgery
Assis, T., Galvin, C., Castillo, J. P., Haouchine, N., Kersten‐Oertel, M., Gao, Z., Crispin‐Ortuzar, M., Price, S. J., Santarius, T., Ou, Y., et al. (2026) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2026.104217
Wrobel, M. C., Yao, T., Campbell, R., Baker, R. R., Milano, E. G., Beattie, C., Quail, M. A., Raimondi, F., Loke, Y.-H., Puranik, R., et al. (2026) · Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · doi:10.1016/j.jocmr.2026.102780
Behera, L. K., & Tripathy, S. N. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-26373-5_19
Machine Learning in Medical Imaging: Enhancing Diagnosis and Treatment
Pandey, A., Tamilselvi, P., Sidhu, K. S., et al. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-8828-2_14
van Lieshout, E., Nuyttens, J. J. M. E., Nout, R. A., Hoogeman, M. S., & Milder, M. T. W. (2026) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2026.111739
Zhou, H., He, L., Wang, S., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Physics · doi:10.3389/fphy.2026.1860207
Dudáš, D., Blöcker, T. J., Palacios, M. A., et al. (2026) · Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.phro.2026.101077
“Multiple earlier studies have addressed online contour adaptation using deep learning, via auto-segmentation [11] or DIR [12,13].”
Lin, Y., Wu, S., & Meng, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-38186-6_27
AI in Proton Therapy Treatment Planning: A Narrative Review
Ding, Y., Feng, H., Bues, M., Fatyga, M., Liu, T., Zhang, W., Whitaker, T. J., Lin, H., Lee, N. Y., Simone, C. B., et al. (2026) · International Journal of Particle Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ijpt.2026.101965
- Authors
- Zou, J., Gao, B., Song, Y., & Qin, J.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Zou, Jing
- Venue
- Frontiers in Oncology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2022-12-07
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 1047215-1047215
- ISSN
- 2234-943X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9768226
- OpenAlex
- W4311708135
- Semantic Scholar
- bd9f8fbe239068c34dd60bccf0878d435b9060f1
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 206
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13
- FWCI
- 5.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- deformable medical image registration, deep learning, image registration, unsupervised registration, image fusion, image-guided navigation, evaluation metrics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review