Cited by 91Medical Image Segmentation TechniquesAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

A review of deep learning-based deformable medical image registration

Open access
Zou, Jing, Gao, Bingchen, Song, Youyi, Qin, Jing·2022·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

The alignment of images through deformable image registration is vital to clinical applications (e.g., atlas creation, image fusion, and tumor targeting in image-guided navigation systems) and is still a challenging problem. Recent progress in the field of deep learning has significantly advanced the performance of medical image registration. In this review, we present a comprehensive survey on deep learning-based deformable medical image registration methods. These methods are classified into five categories: Deep Iterative Methods, Supervised Methods, Unsupervised Methods, Weakly Supervised Methods, and Latest Methods. A detailed review of each category is provided with discussions about contributions, tasks, and inadequacies. We also provide statistical analysis for the selected papers from the point of view of image modality, the region of interest (ROI), evaluation metrics, and method categories. In addition, we summarize 33 publicly available datasets that are used for benchmarking the registration algorithms. Finally, the remaining challenges, future directions, and potential trends are discussed in our review.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review surveys deep learning-based deformable medical image registration, classifying methods into deep iterative, supervised, unsupervised, weakly supervised, and latest techniques, based on 91 selected studies. It summarizes public datasets and reports trends in modalities, ROIs, evaluation metrics, and method categories, while outlining remaining challenges.

Key findings

  • The review classifies deep learning-based deformable registration into five categories: Deep Iterative Methods, Supervised Methods, Unsupervised Methods, Weakly Supervised Methods, and Latest Methods; the Methods section describes four categories by evolution and treats latest techniques separately.
  • Among 91 selected studies, MR-MR and CT-CT were the most common modalities at 50% and 30%; the top ROIs were brain (47%), lung (19%), and prostate (14%); DSC was the most popular evaluation metric at 46%; unsupervised and supervised methods accounted for 31% and 22%, respectively.
  • The review summarizes public datasets for benchmarking: the abstract states 33 publicly available datasets, while the Datasets section says “Our review summarized 30 public datasets from deep learning registration studies in Table 1,” mostly brain MR and lung CT, with examples including ADNI, COPDGene, OAI, and PROMISE12.
  • Approximate backbone parameters reported are GAN 11M, CNN 14M, U-Net 19M, MLP 15M, and Transformer 46M; future directions include diffeomorphic registration, registration efficiency, large deformation of soft tissues, and registration constraints.

Methods

  • Design: narrative review of deep learning-based deformable medical image registration, including statistical analysis of selected papers and tables of methods and datasets.
  • Data/sample: 91 studies were included after searching keywords such as “deep learning,” “medical image registration,” “supervised,” “unsupervised,” “motion estimation,” “GAN,” “deep similarity,” “Transformer,” “contrastive learning,” “meta learning,” and “knowledge distillation,” with sources including CVPR, MICCAI, MIA, TMI, ISBI, MLMI, and MIDL, plus Google Scholar, arXiv, and PubMed.
  • Analysis: papers were excluded if they did not report training dataset details or clearly state methods and validations; the review provides statistical analysis by modality, ROI, evaluation metric, and method category, and summarizes public datasets in Table 1.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state a dedicated limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: as a narrative review, it does not describe a formal systematic review protocol, risk-of-bias assessment, or meta-analysis; inclusion relied on specified keywords, sources, and exclusions for missing dataset details or unclear methods/validations.
  • Evident from the text: the abstract says 33 publicly available datasets, while the Datasets section says 30 public datasets are summarized in Table 1, an inconsistency in the paper itself.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2022.1047215

Cites

173 of 175 references verified1 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

35 of 51 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisenone given

    Previous reviews lack a summary of public datasets for benchmarking registration algorithms.

    “On one hand, these reviews lack a summary of the public dataset for benchmarking registration algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] Boveiri, 2020, Medical image registration using deep neural networks: A comprehensive review, Medical Image Analysis source

      The cited review does summarize datasets used to evaluate registration approaches. Its Literature Review Analysis (p. 35) lists frequently used datasets, distinguishes private datasets from the others, and presents their frequency of use in Figure 35. That is contrary to describing this review as lacking a dataset summary. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] Fu, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A review, Phys Med Biol source

      The Benchmark section says the review summarizes brain registration datasets. Its Brain subsection says table 11 lists datasets to facilitate benchmarking, and the Statistics section notes the availability of public brain datasets. This contradicts the claim that this review lacks such a summary. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [21] Haskins, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A survey, Mach Vision Appl source

      The survey describes its scope as reviewing deep-learning registration methods (p. 1), and its Conclusion (p. 22) discusses dataset availability as a research challenge. Neither passage says whether this or other previous reviews lack a summary of public benchmarking datasets. Searches for public datasets and benchmarking found no passage that settles that claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [22] Xiao, 2021, A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods, Quantitative Imaging Med Surg source

      The Review Article section says few earlier reviews focused on 3D medical image registration, but does not say they lacked public-dataset summaries. The Statistical analysis section explains why public datasets are useful for fair benchmarking and says this review summarizes them in Table 1; neither passage establishes what earlier reviews omitted. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Previous reviews about deep learning-based medical image registration literature have been published.

    “Though previous reviews about deep learning-based medical image registration literature have been published (19–22), there are still some deficiencies.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] Boveiri, 2020, Medical image registration using deep neural networks: A comprehensive review, Medical Image Analysis source
    • cites [20] Fu, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A review, Phys Med Biol source
    • cites [21] Haskins, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A survey, Mach Vision Appl source
    • cites [22] Xiao, 2021, A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods, Quantitative Imaging Med Surg source
  • Premisecitation

    Wu et al. firstly proposed to adopt deep learning technology to obtain the similarity metric for registration.

    “Wu et al. (56) firstly proposed to adopt deep learning technology to obtain the similarity metric for registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] Wu, 2013 source

      The Abstract and Method §2.2 describe using deep learning to obtain features for detecting correspondences in image registration. Method §2.2 says similarity between those learned feature vectors is measured by normalized cross-correlation, not by a learned similarity metric. The paper also does not establish the claim that Wu et al. were the first to propose this approach; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The dynamics of optimization in neural ODE models are naturally continuous.

    “Additionally, the dynamics of optimization are naturally continuous.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [163] Chen, 2018, Neural ordinary differential equations source

      The Introduction (p. 1) describes the hidden-state dynamics of neural ODEs as continuous, and Section 2 (p. 2) describes computing training gradients by solving an ODE backward in time. Neither passage says that the dynamics of optimization itself are naturally continuous; the claim shifts the continuity from model states and gradient computation to optimization. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Compared to well-known deep learning models like ResNet and U-Net, neural ODE models are more efficient in terms of memory and parameters.

    “Compared to well-known deep learning models like ResNet and U-Net, neural ODE models are more efficient in terms of memory and parameters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [163] Chen, 2018, Neural ordinary differential equations source

      Table 1 in Section 3 (p. 3) reports that the ODE-Net used fewer parameters than the tested ResNet (0.22M versus 0.60M) and had constant rather than depth-dependent memory cost. The comparison is specific to those MNIST models; our copy does not provide a memory or parameter comparison with U-Net. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 63
  • May combine two claims. 45
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ADNI develops standardized protocols for multi-center comparison and has helped over 1,000 scientific publications explore prevention and treatment of AD since 2004.

    “ADNI develops standardized protocols for multi-center comparison and helps over 1,000 scientific publications explore the prevention and treatment of AD since 2004”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Jack, 2008, The alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): Mri methods, J Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Off J Int Soc Magnetic Resonance Med source

      The Abstract and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) describe ADNI’s development of standardized MRI methods for multisite studies. The Results mention a protocol-selection meeting in 2004, but our copy does not substantiate the claim that ADNI helped over 1,000 publications explore AD prevention and treatment since then. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The ADNI dataset contains MRI longitudinal image scans in AD patients from 63 sites across the US and Canada.

    “The ADNI dataset as one example in brain datasets contains MRI longitudinal image scans in AD patients from 63 sites across the US and Canada.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Jack, 2008, The alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): Mri methods, J Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Off J Int Soc Magnetic Resonance Med source

      The Abstract describes longitudinal MRI scans of participants with Alzheimer’s disease at multiple North American sites. It specifies 55 participating sites, however, not the claimed 63, and does not explicitly identify the countries as the US and Canada. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Wu et al. used convolutional-stacked autoencoder (CAE) to extract discriminative features for 3D deformable brain MRI registration, and registration was performed by optimizing NCC of the two features, achieving improved registration accuracy.

    “They adopted convolutional-stacked autoencoder (CAE) to extract the discriminative features for 3D deformable brain MRI registration. Then, the registration was performed by optimizing the NCC of the two features and improved registration accuracy was achieved.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [56] Wu, 2013 source

      Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    PROMISE12 is the dataset made for the MICCAI prostate segmentation challenge, used by 11 academic teams for various segmentation algorithms and showed promising results.

    “PROMISE12 as the example in the prostate dataset is the dataset made for MICCAI prostate segmentation challenge, which was used by 11 academic teams for various segmentation algorithms and showed promising results”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [55] Litjens, 2014, Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for mri: The promise12 challenge, Med Image Anal source

      The Introduction describes the PROMISE12 dataset and its use in a challenge associated with the MICCAI2012 workshop. The Abstract reports 11 participating teams, varied segmentation methods, and good-to-excellent average algorithm performance. However, the teams came from both academic research groups and industry, not exclusively academia. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More than 375 publications have used COPDGene to explore assessment and identify biomarkers of COPD since 2009.

    “More than 375 publications have used COPDGene to explore the assessment and identify the biomarkers of COPD since 2009”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Regan, 2011, Genetic epidemiology of copd (copdgene) study design, COPD: J Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Dis source

      The Conclusion (page unavailable) says COPDGene’s CT phenotyping may generate diagnostic imaging biomarkers, and its data will be available for future studies. The paper does not report that more than 375 publications have used COPDGene since 2009; it describes those uses as prospective. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fu et al. designed an MR-TRUS registration network for prostate interventions; the supervision deformation field is generated from population-based FE models from point clouds with biomechanical constraints.

    “Recently, Fu et al. (75) designed an MR-TRUS registration network for prostate interventions; the supervision deformation field is generated from population-based FE models from point clouds with biomechanical constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [75] Fu, 2021, Biomechanically constrained non-rigid mr-trus prostate registration using deep learning based 3d point cloud matching, Med Image Anal source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Fan et al. presented a Birnet for brain MRI image registration by utilizing the deformation field estimated from the traditional registration method.

    “Fan et al. (74) presented a Birnet for brain MRI image registration by utilizing the deformation field estimated from the traditional registration method.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [74] Fan, 2019, Birnet: Brain image registration using dual-supervised fully convolutional networks, Med Image Anal source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Registration is of great significance in radiotherapy; it is performed to calculate the offset of the current target from the planned position, and the offset is used to adjust patient position or radiation beam.

    “Moreover, registration is also of great significance in radiotherapy (11, 12); it is performed to calculate the offset of the current target from the planned position, and the offset determined from the registration is used to adjust the patient position or the radiation beam.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [11] Krilavicius, 2016, Predicting respiratory motion for real-time tumour tracking in radiotherapy source

      The Introduction describes determining a tumour’s current position and compensating for motion by repositioning the beam; the Abstract also mentions controlling the couch or beam. Neither passage describes registration to calculate an offset from the planned position, so the claim’s registration-specific explanation is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [12] Brock, 2017, Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: Report of the aapm radiation therapy committee task group no. 132, Med Phys source

      Section 1.B.3 states that registration determines the patient's offset from the planned position and that the resulting transformation is typically used to adjust patient position. Section 6.D.2 also discusses target-focused registration at treatment delivery. The cited passages do not establish that the offset is used to adjust the radiation beam, so that alternative is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Yang et al. proposed to register brain MRI images using a U-Net-like structure in one step.

    “At first, Yang et al. (73) proposed to register brain MRI images using a U-Net-like structure in one step.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [73] Yang, 2016, Fast predictive image registration source

      The Network Structure section (p. 3) describes an encoder–decoder network using patches from fixed and moving images, and the paper tests it on brain images (Experiments, p. 5). But the network predicts LDDMM initial momentum, from which the deformation is computed by integration (Initial Momentum LDDMM Parameterization, p. 2); the copy does not establish that registration is completed in one step. It calls the encoder VGG-style rather than U-Net-like, though the encoder–decoder description supports that resemblance. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    Some details of the selected literature were missing in previous reviews.

    “On the other hand, some details of the selected literature were missing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] Boveiri, 2020, Medical image registration using deep neural networks: A comprehensive review, Medical Image Analysis source

      The Reference Gathering Methodology (p. 3) says the authors found that their initial search overlooked some references, but it does not say that previous reviews omitted details of their selected literature. Searches for previous reviews and missing literature details found no passage in our copy addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [20] Fu, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A review, Phys Med Biol source

      The Introduction says that few previous reviews focused specifically on deep learning in medical image registration, and describes this review's aim to provide detailed statistics. It does not say that previous reviews omitted details of their selected literature. Searches for missing details in previous reviews found no passage addressing that point; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [21] Haskins, 2020, Deep learning in medical image registration: A survey, Mach Vision Appl source

      The Introduction (p. 3) describes how this survey organizes the methods it covers, and the Conclusion (p. 22) summarizes their challenges. Neither passage says that previous reviews omitted details of their selected literature; searches for that comparison found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [22] Xiao, 2021, A review of deep learning-based three-dimensional medical image registration methods, Quantitative Imaging Med Surg source

      The Review Article section says that few earlier reviews focused on 3D medical image registration, but it does not say they omitted details of their selected literature. Searches for missing or omitted details in previous reviews found no passage addressing that claim. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Spatial transformer networks (STNs) introduced in 2015 are one significant advancement beneficial in this era.

    “The spatial transformer networks (STNs) (80) introduced in 2015 is one significant advancement that is beneficial in this era.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80] Jaderberg, 2015, Spatial transformer networks source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    STN can be inserted anywhere in various networks to execute a spatial transform on an input feature map because it is a completely differentiable module.

    “STN can be inserted anywhere in various networks to execute a spatial transform on an input feature map because it is a completely differentiable module.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [80] Jaderberg, 2015, Spatial transformer networks source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Traditional registration algorithms are constructed as continuous optimization problems or discrete optimization problems.

    “The traditional registration algorithms are constructed as continuous optimization problems (15, 16) or discrete optimization problems (17).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [15] Thirion, 1998, Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with maxwell’s demons, Med Image Anal source

      The Abstract (no page given) describes diffusion-based image matching and relates it to traditional attraction-based methods, but does not classify registration algorithms as continuous or discrete optimization problems. Searches for both optimization terms returned no passage in our copy that addresses that distinction. (LLM, conf=0.70)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [16] Rueckert, 1999, Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast mr images, IEEE Trans Med Imaging source
    • cites [17] Heinrich, 2013, Towards realtime multimodal fusion for image-guided interventions using self-similarities source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    MRI provides better contrast for soft tissues, and CT has clear details of bone.

    “magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides better contrast for soft tissues, and computed tomography (CT) has clear details of bone (3)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Huang, 2020, A review of multimodal medical image fusion techniques, Comput Math Methods Med source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    COPDGene contains chest CT scans of more than 10,000 individuals for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

    “COPDGene as one example in lung datasets contains chest CT scans of more than 10,000 individuals for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [47] Regan, 2011, Genetic epidemiology of copd (copdgene) study design, COPD: J Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Dis source

      The Abstract’s Methods/Results section says COPDGene planned to enroll 10,000 smokers, with and without COPD, and obtain chest CT scans from all participants. It does not establish that the dataset already contained scans from more than 10,000 individuals. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Sokooti et al. presented a multi-scale network to learn a deformation field of intra-subject 3D chest CT registration, using random DVF as supervision.

    “Sokooti et al. (77) presented a multi-scale network to learn a deformation field of intra-subject 3D chest CT registration. They used random DVF as supervision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [77] Sokooti, 2017, Nonrigid image registration using multi-scale 3d convolutional neural network source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Traditional registration algorithms' computational performance is hampered by high dimension and non-convex properties, and their capability to capture complex deformations is limited.

    “Their computational performance, however, is hampered by the high dimension and non-convex properties, and their capability to capture complex deformations is limited (18).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [18] Schnabel, 2016, Advances and challenges in deformable image registration: From image fusion to complex motion modelling, Medical Image Analysis source

      Section 2.2 says traditional B-spline registration has difficulty with motion discontinuities and describes newer methods that avoid local minima and reduce computational complexity. The paper also says continuous optimization can be prone to local minima. These passages support limitations in modelling complex motion and aspects of computational difficulty, but they do not attribute poor computational performance specifically to high dimensionality or non-convexity. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Neural ODE models have the advantage of adaptive computing, making them potentially appropriate for application in medical applications.

    “Neural ODE models have the advantage of adaptive computing, making them potentially appropriate for application in medical applications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [163] Chen, 2018, Neural ordinary differential equations source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Accessing medical data is not allowed for most researchers since clinical data contain private information and only researchers with authorization could utilize the dataset.

    “Finally, accessing medical data is not allowed for most researchers since the clinical data contain private information and only researchers with authorization could utilize the dataset (25).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] Li, 2021, A systematic collection of medical image datasets for deep learning, arXiv source

      Section 6.1 says most non-medical researchers lack authorization to access clinical data and explains that privacy and ethical restrictions limit access. The citing sentence broadens this to most researchers generally, which the passage does not establish. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    DSC is the most popular evaluation metric, accounting for 46% of all studies.

    “Based on Figure 1C , DSC is the most popular metric and accounts for 46% of all the studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The review summarized 30 public datasets from deep learning registration studies in Table 1.

    “Our review summarized 30 public datasets from deep learning registration studies in Table 1 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The three most popular ROIs investigated are brain, lung, and prostate, accounting for 47%, 19%, and 14% of all studies.

    “The three most popular ROIs being investigated are brain, lung, and the prostate, and each accounts for 47%, 19%, and 14% of all the studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    MR-MR and CT-CT are the most commonly studied modalities in the selected studies, accounting for 50% and 30% respectively.

    “As shown in Figure 1A , MR-MR and CT-CT are the most commonly studied modalities, and each accounts for 50% and 30% of the selected studies”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Unsupervised and supervised methods are the two most popular method categories, accounting for 31% and 22% of all studies respectively.

    “Unsupervised and supervised methods are two most popular methods and each accounts for 31% and 22% of all the studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most of the summarized datasets consist of brain MR and lung CT images, with other modalities in ROIs such as abdomen and knee also included.

    “Most of the datasets consist of brain MR and lung CT images, and other modalities in different ROIs such as the abdomen and knee were also included.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    The number of literatures for the deep similarity metric category has decreased, and this trend is projected to continue.

    “Nowadays, the number of literatures for this category has decreased, and this trend is projected to continue.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    When training a 3D lung CT registration network, a GPU card with a memory larger than 12 G is necessary.

    “when training 3D lung CT registration network, a GPU card with a memory larger than 12 G is necessary.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    GAN has the smallest model parameter and the parameter of Transformer expands significantly.

    “We can see that GAN has the smallest model parameter and the parameter of Transformer expands significantly.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    It is difficult to interpret learned deep similarity metrics, and the iterative process still limits the use of these methods.

    “Moreover, it is difficult to interpret the learned deep similarity metrics, and the iterative process still limits the use of these methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Fully supervised methods are widely studied and have notable results.

    “The fully supervised methods are widely studied and have notable results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    The formulation in the loss function of the learning network constrains the output DVF to be accurate.

    “The formulation in the loss function of the learning network constrains the output DVF to be accurate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Similarity measures in RL-based registration methods are routinely provided in a traditional way, e.g., MSE, NMI, or LCC, and thus they have limited applications in multimodality registration.

    “Different from deep similarity metrics-based methods, the similarity measures in these kinds of methods are routinely provided in a traditional way, e.g., MSE, NMI, or LCC. Thus, they have limited applications in multimodality registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The generation of real or synthetic deformation fields is hard, and these deformation fields are different from the real ground truth, which will confine the accuracy and efficiency of these kinds of methods.

    “However, the generation of real or synthetic deformation fields is hard, and these deformation fields are different from the real ground truth, which will confine the accuracy and efficiency of these kinds of methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    Generally, the unsupervised learning framework consists of similarity-based methods and GAN-based methods.

    “Generally, the unsupervised learning framework consists of the similarity-based methods and GAN-based methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Preparation of the required ground truth is inconvenient and leads to the supervised framework having limitations in generalizing results in different domains and applying various registration tasks.

    “Even though different data augmentation techniques and data collection methods have been utilized in supervised learning, the preparation of the required ground truth is inconvenient and leads to the fact that the supervised framework has limitations in generalizing results in different domains and applying various registration tasks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    OAI contains MRI and x-ray longitudinal measurements from 4,796 subjects.

    “OAI as the example in the knee dataset contains MRI and x-ray longitudinal measurements from 4,796 subjects”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Eckstein, 2014, Imaging research results from the osteoarthritis initiative (oai): A review and lessons learned 10 years after start of enrolment, Ann rheumatic Dis source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    More than 400 research manuscripts have used OAI to explore assessments and interventions of knee osteoarthritis.

    “more than 400 research manuscripts have used the OAI to explore the assessments and interventions of knee osteoarthritis”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] Eckstein, 2014, Imaging research results from the osteoarthritis initiative (oai): A review and lessons learned 10 years after start of enrolment, Ann rheumatic Dis source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    RL-based methods mainly focus on rigid registration, as it is hard for agents to tackle the large state space generated from deformable vector field.

    “Moreover, RL-based methods mainly focus on rigid registration, as it is hard for agents to tackle the large state space generated from deformable vector field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Deep learning-based deformable registration methods have greatly attracted researchers' attention because data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired or unpaired images compared with traditional methods.

    “Recently, deep learning-based deformable registration methods have greatly attracted researchers’ attention, as data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired/unpaired images when compared with traditional methods.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired or unpaired images when compared with traditional methods.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Various traditional registration methods and toolboxes have been devised, including Elastix and ANTs.

    “Various traditional registration methods and toolboxes have been devised over the last few decades, e.g., Elastix (13) and ANTs (14).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Klein, 2009, Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration, IEEE Trans Med Imaging source
    • cites [14] Avants, 2009, Advanced normalization tools (ants), Insight J source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Real deformation fields are generated from traditional registration, and synthetic deformation fields are obtained from statistical models or random transformations.

    “The real deformation fields are generated from traditional registration, and the synthetic deformation fields are obtained from statistical models or random transformations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Systematic sextant TRUS biopsies have poor imaging quality and lack sharp contrast between cancer and normal tissue, resulting in false-negative rates of up to 30%.

    “but for systematic sextant biopsies, its poor imaging quality and lack of sharp contrast between cancer and normal tissue results in false-negative rates of up to 30% (10).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Norberg, 1997, The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer, Urology source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Uzunova et al. designed a network for registration between 2D brain MRI and 2D cardiac MRI, with ground truth generated using statistical appearance models (SAMs), adapted FlowNet architecture, and obtained outperforming results.

    “Uzunova et al. (78) designed a network for the registration between 2D brain MRI and 2D cardiac MRI. Their ground truth is generated utilizing statistical appearance models (SAMs). They adapted FlowNet (79) architecture and obtained outperforming results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [78] Uzunova, 2017, Training cnns for image registration from few samples with model-based data augmentation source
    • cites [79] Dosovitskiy, 2015, Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    So et al. proposed a novel learning-based metric using Bhattacharyya Distances, where dissimilarity of testing image pairs is calculated by incorporating expected intensity distributions learned from registered training image pairs.

    “So et al. (57) proposed a novel learning-based metric by using Bhattacharyya Distances. The dissimilarity of the testing image pairs is calculated by incorporating the expected intensity distributions learned from the registered training image pairs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] So, 2017, A novel learning-based dissimilarity metric for rigid and non-rigid medical image registration by using bhattacharyya distances, Pattern Recognition source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Rohe et al. adopted a U-Net-like network to predict the deformation field for 3D cardiac MRI volume registration, with supervisions generated from mesh segmentations and SSD as loss; their results are comparable with traditional registration.

    “Rohe et al. (76) adopted a U-Net-like network to predict the deformation field for 3D cardiac MRI volume registration. The supervisions are transformations generated from mesh segmentations, and SSD between the supervision and prediction is set as the loss function. Their results are comparable with those from traditional registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [76] Rohé, 2017, Svf-net: learning deformable image registration using shape matching source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A sufficient number of explicitly annotated ground truths are required for deep similarity metric training, which hinders the development of such approaches.

    “However, a sufficient number of explicitly annotated ground truths are required for deep similarity metric training, which hinders the development of such approaches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    One disadvantage of deep iterative methods is that the registration process is time-consuming and iterative.

    “One disadvantage of deep iterative methods is that the registration process is time-consuming and iterative.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Training and assessment of DL models on multiple public datasets could better demonstrate generalizability and clearly compare results on fair benchmarks, including computational time and registration accuracy.

    “the training and assessment of DL models on multiple public datasets could also better demonstrate the generalizability of the proposed methods and clearly compare the results on fair benchmarks, including computational time and registration accuracy.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Weakly supervised methods naturally improve the performance of registration by introducing anatomical constraints.

    “Weakly supervised methods naturally improve the performance of registration by introducing the anatomical constraints.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Anatomical labels such as segmentations and key points are feasible in practice and credible for training.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The constraints are usually performed by penalizing the small and large values of the Jacobian determinant.

    “Usually, the constraints are performed by penalizing the small and large values of the Jacobian determinant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    These benefits encourage researchers to study how to use neural ODEs to optimize the registration of medical images.

    “These benefits encourage researchers to study how to use neural ODEs to optimize the registration of medical images.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Transformer is unavailable when the data size is large and GPU memory is limited.

    “the Transformer is unavailable when the data size is large and GPU memory is limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Unsupervised methods and weakly supervised methods are less reliant on ground truth information and have become hot topics for deep learning-based registration algorithms.

    “In contrast, unsupervised methods and weakly supervised methods are less reliant on ground truth information and become hot topics for deep learning-based registration algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Supervised methods need ground truth supervision that is impractical to obtain.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The evolution of learning-based image registration algorithms has followed a similar path to that of deep learning models.

    “The evolution of learning-based image registration algorithms has followed a similar path to that of the deep learning models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Recently, popular networks such as Transformer and contrastive learning are explored for deformable medical image registration and achieved promising results.

    “Recently, popular networks, such as Transformer and contrastive learning, are explored for deformable medical image registration and achieved promising results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some datasets are still collecting data for further imaging analysis support, such as BraTS since 2012.

    “Some datasets are still collecting data for further imaging analysis support, such as the data collected for BraTs since 2012 (37).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [37] Bakas, 2018, Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge, arXiv source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Neural ODE and diffusion models have been explored for deformable image registration.

    “Nowadays, the popular neural ODE and diffusion models have also been explored for deformable image registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Analyzing transformations in terms of spatially corresponding patches is challenging in multimodal registration and can negatively impact registration results.

    “analyzing transformations in terms of spatially corresponding patches could be challenging in multimodal registration and can negatively impact registration results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Prevalent and testified public databases are normally chosen by research teams in deep learning-based medical image analysis.

    “prevalent and testified public databases are thus normally chosen by research teams in deep learning-based medical image analysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    CNNs, SAEs, GANs, DRLs, and deep RNNs make up the majority of the recently developed deep learning algorithms used for medical image registration.

    “CNNs, SAEs, GANs, DRLs, and deep RNNs make up the majority of the recently developed deep learning algorithms used for medical image registration”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Segmentations are useful in evaluating registration algorithms.

    “segmentations are also useful in evaluating the registration algorithms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Multi-stage coarse-to-fine methods consume large GPU memory and training is time-consuming as the networks are trained separately.

    “This kind of method consumes large GPU memory and the training is time-consuming as the networks are trained separately.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Another method for learning large deformation is to construct cascaded networks, in which each cascaded network learns an intermediate deformation field and the source image is recursively and progressively warped by the field, finally aligned to the target image.

    “Another method for learning large deformation is to construct cascaded networks, in which each cascaded network learns an intermediate deformation field, and the source image is recursively and progressively warped by the field, finally aligned to the target image.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In this situation, unsupervised methods are promising to tackle the problems of fully supervised methods.

    “In this situation, unsupervised methods are promising to tackle the problems.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The other method to guarantee diffeomorphism is to introduce diffeomorphic integration layers.

    “The other method is to introduce diffeomorphic integration layers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The integration is performed by scaling and squaring the stationary velocity field.

    “The integration is performed by scaling and squaring the stationary velocity field.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Premisenone given

    GAN can ensure that the generated registered image has the same intensity distribution as the source image while being similar to the target image in terms of structures.

    “GAN can ensure that the generated registered image has the same characteristic (intensity distribution) as the source image while being similar to the target image in terms of structures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Unsupervised similarity-based methods have become more popular in recent years and are appropriate in many deformable registration tasks as they do not require extra information.

    “the unsupervised similarity-based methods have become more popular in recent years, and they are appropriate in many deformable registration tasks as they do not require extra information.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cascaded networks are still memory-consuming and difficult to converge as all cascaded networks are trained simultaneously.

    “This kind of network is still memory-consuming and is difficult to converge as all cascaded networks are trained simultaneously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    An MRI session generally lasts 2 h under supervision and manipulation of professional researchers, and subjects are almost fully constrained in the specialized machine to obtain accurate data.

    “Considering MRI method as the example, each session generally lasts 2 h under the supervision and manipulation of professional researchers, and during the scanning process, the subjects are almost fully constrained in the specialized machine in order to obtain accurate data (24).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [24] Young, 2015, What does an mri scan cost, Healthc Financ Manage
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Additional modules and branches add complexity to registration models.

    “Expect the backbone parameters, additional modules and branches also add the complexity of the registration models.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    A number of registration methods for medical images based on deep similarity metrics have been studied and have shown great potential in multimodality image registration.

    “So far, a number of registration methods for medical image based on deep similarity metrics have been studied and have shown great potential in multimodality image registration.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Image registration and image segmentation are inextricably linked and can help one another.

    “image registration and image segmentation are inextricably linked and can help one another.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    From 2013, researchers began to apply deep learning techniques to image registration, and applications of deep models for registration flourished from 2017.

    “From 2013, researchers began to apply deep learning techniques to image registration, and the applications of deep models for registration flourished from 2017.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Deep similarity-based models and reinforcement learning-based methods adopt an iterative strategy, which is time-consuming.

    “Deep similarity-based models and reinforcement learning-based methods adopt iterative strategy, which is time-consuming.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Public datasets normally contain scans within the brain, lung, and prostate ROIs because common diseases exist in these regions.

    “The public datasets normally contain scans within these three ROIs as common diseases exist in these regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Image registration neural networks are gradually moving from handling 2D images to 3D or 4D (dynamic) volumes, and converting from supervised methods to unsupervised methods and weakly supervised methods.

    “Image registration neural networks are gradually moving from handling 2D images to 3D or 4D (dynamic) volumes, and converting from supervised methods to unsupervised methods and weakly supervised methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Diffeomorphic image registration using deep models has caught the attention of researchers due to characteristics like topology preservation and transformation invertibility.

    “Due to characteristics like topology preservation and transformation invertibility, diffeomorphic image registration using deep models has caught the attention of researchers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The learning of large and irregular deformation caused by organ movement (e.g., lung respiratory motion) is still a challenging problem and needs further research.

    “The learning of large and irregular deformation caused by organ movement (e.g., lung respiratory motion) is still a challenging problem and needs further research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    From the point of view of registration efficiency, the training time and network parameters still need promotion, especially for 3D image registration.

    “From the point of view of registration efficiency, the training time and network parameters still need promotion, especially for 3D image registration.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The guarantee for diffeomorphism in learning-based methods remains a challenging problem.

    “the guarantee for diffeomorphism in learning-based methods remains a challenging problem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Deep learning-based methods have shown high computational efficiency and comparable accuracy compared with traditional methods.

    “Deep learning-based methods have shown high computational efficiency and comparable accuracy compared with traditional methods.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    One strategy to address large deformation is to adopt a multi-stage coarse-to-fine architecture.

    “one strategy to address the large deformation is to adopt multi-stage coarse-to-fine architecture.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    More papers implement GAN in diverse registration tasks.

    “currently, more papers implement GAN in diverse registration tasks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The most commonly used technique for tackling this issue is to add the L2 norm on the gradient of the deformation field to regularize the predicted deformation.

    “The most commonly used technique for tackling this issue is to add the L2 norm on the gradient of the deformation field to regularize the predicted deformation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
85 of 85
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Deformable registration is still a challenging task due to its intrinsic complexity, particularly when the deformation is large.

    “deformable registration is still a challenging task due to its intrinsic complexity, particularly when the deformation is large.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In clinical practice, deformable registration can find much more applications than rigid and affine registration.

    “In clinical practice, however, deformable registration can find much more applications than rigid and affine registration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired or unpaired images when compared with traditional methods.

    “as data-driven methods benefit significantly from a large number of paired/unpaired images when compared with traditional methods.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Deep neural networks can prompt the iterative optimization procedure to the training stage and achieve fast inference in the test stage.

    “Firstly, deep neural networks can prompt the iterative optimization procedure to the training stage and achieve fast inference in the test stage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neural networks are able to work as an approximator of the similarity between the image pairs to help registration.

    “Secondly, neural networks are able to work as an approximator of the similarity between the image pairs to help registration.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The deformation field can be predicted directly through an end-to-end model without pre-defining a transformation model.

    “Thirdly, the deformation field can be predicted directly through an end-to-end model without pre-defining a transformation model.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Intensity-based similarity measurements work quite well for mono-modality image registration, in which the image pair shares similar intensity distribution.

    “Generally, these intensity-based similarity measurements work quite well for mono-modality image registration (e.g., CT-CT and MRI-MRI image registration), in which the image pair shares similar intensity distribution.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Intensity-based metrics are not capable of measuring multimodality registration due to the diverse intensity distributions across modalities.

    “However, these metrics focus on intensity values; thus, they are not capable of measuring multimodality registration due to the diverse intensity distributions across modalities.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The absence of relevant data is one of the main bottlenecks in current learning-based medical image analysis.

    “The absence of relevant data, as one of the main bottlenecks in current learning-based medical image analysis, resulted from several challenges”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Qualified medical images need to be acquired by strict protocols and expensive scanning devices.

    “qualified medical images cannot be collected from handwritten ones but need to be acquired by strict protocols and expensive scanning devices.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Labels and annotation of medical images have to be achieved by specialized professionals.

    “labels and the annotation of the medical images have to be achieved by specialized professionals.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    To keep accuracy and avoid bias of the ground truth, a single scan might be labeled by multiple experts.

    “in order to keep the accuracy and possibly avoid the bias of the ground truth, a single scan might be labeled by multiple experts.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Supervised methods need ground truth supervision that is impractical to obtain.

    “Supervised methods need ground truth supervision that is impractical to obtain.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Anatomical labels such as segmentations and key points are feasible in practice and credible for training.

    “such anatomical labels are feasible in practice and credible for training.”
14 of 14

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Reference 125 is assigned different anatomical regions

    Minor

    The text describes reference 125 as abdominal CT registration, whereas Table 5 lists its organ as lung.

  • Dataset count differs between the abstract and Datasets section

    Minor

    The abstract says the review summarizes 33 public datasets, while the Datasets section says 30. Table 1 lists 33 datasets, supporting the abstract's count.

  • Methods are classified into both five and four categories

    Minor

    The abstract lists five method categories, including Latest Methods, but the Methods section says there are four categories.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

31 of the 206 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Jaderberg, 2015, Spatial transformer networks
  2. Vaswani, 2017, Attention is all you need, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 30

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zou, J., Gao, B., Song, Y., & Qin, J.
Affiliations
Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Zou, Jing
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2022-12-07
Volume
12
Pages
1047215-1047215
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4311708135
Cited by
91
References
206
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13
FWCI
5.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
deformable medical image registration, deep learning, image registration, unsupervised registration, image fusion, image-guided navigation, evaluation metrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review