Cited by 16Medical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsRadiation Detection and Scintillator TechnologiesCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Performance evaluation of the mouse version of the LabPET II PET scanner

Open access
Gaudin, Émilie, Thibaudeau, Christian, Arpin, Louis, Leroux, Jean-Daniel, Toussaint, Maxime, Beaudoin, Jean-Francois, Cadorette, Jules, Paillé, Maxime +7 more·2021·Physics in Medicine & Biology

Abstract

The LabPET II is a new positron emission tomography technology platform designed to achieve submillimetric spatial resolution imaging using fully pixelated avalanche photodiodes-based detectors and highly integrated parallel front-end processing electronics. The detector was designed as a generic building block to develop devices for preclinical imaging of small to mid-sized animals and for clinical imaging of the human brain. The aim of this work is to assess the physical characteristics and imaging performance of the mouse version of LabPET II scanner following the NEMA NU4-2008 standard and using high resolution phantoms and in vivo imaging applications. A reconstructed spatial resolution of 0.78 mm (0.5 μ l ) is measured close to the center of the radial field of view. With an energy window of 350 650 keV, the system absolute sensitivity is 1.2% and its maximum noise equivalent count rate reaches 61.1 kcps at 117 MBq. Submillimetric spatial resolution is achieved in a hot spot phantom and tiny bone structures were resolved with unprecedented contrast in the mouse. These results provide convincing evidence of the capabilities of the LabPET II technology for biomolecular imaging in preclinical research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1361-6560/abd952

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fontaine R, Arpin L, Bouchard J, Paille M, Bergeron M, Pepin C-M, Cadorette J & Lecomte R (2016). The hardware architecture of the LabPET II-mouse, a highly integrated APD-based PET scanner, 2016 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC), Vol. M06–2, pp. 1– 3. Strasbourg, France, Oct. 29-Nov. 6, 2016.
  2. Leroux J-D (2014). Contribution aux méthodes de reconstruction d’images appliquées à la tomographie d’émission par positrons par l’exploitation des symétries du système, PhD thesis, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke (Québec) Canada.
  3. McKechnie TS (2016). Telescope Resolution and Optical Tolerance Specifications, Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 405– 464.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaudin, É., Thibaudeau, C., Arpin, L., Leroux, J.-D., Toussaint, M., Beaudoin, J.-F., Cadorette, J., Paillé, M., Pepin, C. M., Koua, K., Bouchard, J., Viscogliosi, N., Paulin, C., Fontaine, R., & Lecomte, R.
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • IR&T Inc., Sherbrooke, QC,
  • Novalgo Inc., Sherbrooke, QC,
  • Sherbrooke Molecular Imaging Center and Department of Nuclear Medicine and Radiobiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC,
Venue
Physics in Medicine & Biology
Published
2021-03-08
Volume
66
Issue
6
Pages
065019
ISSN
  • 0031-9155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6560
OpenAlex
W3118791832
Cited by
16
References
40
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics in Medicine and Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
positron emission tomography, small animal imaging, mouse imaging, noise equivalent count rate, absolute sensitivity, bone imaging, biomolecular imaging
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Calibration, Electronics, Equipment Design, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Phantoms, Imaging, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Positron-Emission Tomography, Mice, Whole Body Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review