The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A no-go theorem for a two-dimensional self-correcting quantum memory based on stabilizer codes
Open accessAbstract
We study properties of stabilizer codes that permit a local description on a regular D -dimensional lattice. Specifically, we assume that the stabilizer group of a code (the gauge group for subsystem codes) can be generated by local Pauli operators such that the support of any generator is bounded by a hypercube of size O (1). Our first result concerns the optimal scaling of the distance d with the linear size of the lattice L . We prove an upper bound d = O ( L D -1 ) which is tight for D =1, 2. This bound applies to both subspace and subsystem stabilizer codes. Secondly, we analyze the suitability of stabilizer codes for building a self-correcting quantum memory. Any stabilizer code with geometrically local generators can be naturally transformed to a local Hamiltonian penalizing states that violate the stabilizer condition. A degenerate ground state of this Hamiltonian corresponds to the logical subspace of the code. We prove that for D =1, 2, different logical states can be mapped into each other by a sequence of single-qubit Pauli errors such that the energy of all intermediate states is upper bounded by a constant independent of the lattice size L . The same result holds if there are unused logical qubits that are treated as 'gauge qubits'. It demonstrates that a self-correcting quantum memory cannot be built using stabilizer codes in dimensions D =1, 2. This result is in sharp contrast with the existence of a classical self-correcting memory in the form of a two-dimensional (2D) ferromagnet. Our results leave open the possibility for a self-correcting quantum memory based on 2D subsystem codes or on 3D subspace or subsystem codes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons
Kitaev, A. Y. (2003) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/s0003-4916(02)00018-0 · Cited by 7,238
Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond
Kitaev, A. (2006) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1016/j.aop.2005.10.005 · Cited by 5,245
Dennis, E., Kitaev, A., Landahl, A., & Preskill, J. (2002) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1499754 · Cited by 1,768
Dennis, E., Kitaev, A., Landahl, A., & Preskill, J. (2001) · CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) · Cited by 1,485
Davies, E. B. (1974) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01608389 · Cited by 934
Topological Quantum Distillation
Bombin, H., & Martin-Delgado, M. A. (2006) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.97.180501 · Cited by 700
Topologically Protected Qubits from a Possible Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall State
Das Sarma, S., Freedman, M., & Nayak, C. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.166802 · Cited by 673
Operator quantum error-correcting subsystems for self-correcting quantum memories
Bacon, D. (2006) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.73.012340 · Cited by 486
Stabilizer Formalism for Operator Quantum Error Correction
Poulin, D. (2005) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.230504 · Cited by 342
Measurement-Only Topological Quantum Computation
Bonderson, P., Freedman, M., & Nayak, C. (2008) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.010501 · Cited by 305
Cited by
Quantum error correction for quantum memories
Terhal, B. M. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.307 · Cited by 1,354
Self-citationHolographic quantum error-correcting codes: toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence
Pastawski, F., Yoshida, B., Harlow, D., & Preskill, J. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep06(2015)149 · Cited by 958
Quantum error correction for beginners
Devitt, S. J., Munro, W. J., & Nemoto, K. (2013) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076001 · Cited by 759
Roads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation
Campbell, E. T., Terhal, B. M., & Vuillot, C. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23460 · Cited by 596
Self-citationDynamical Purification Phase Transition Induced by Quantum Measurements
Gullans, M. J., & Huse, D. A. (2020) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.10.041020 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Bravyi, S., & Terhal, B.
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-04-24
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 043029
- ISSN
- 1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092838737
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 16.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A no-go theorem for a two-dimensional self-correcting quantum memory based on stabilizer codes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/043029
- The paper
- Bravyi, S., & Terhal, B. (2009). A no-go theorem for a two-dimensional self-correcting quantum memory based on stabilizer codes. New Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/11/4/043029
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.