The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coherent-light-boosted, sub-shot noise, quantum interferometry
Open accessAbstract
We present in this paper a new scheme for optical interferometry. We utilize coherent-beam-stimulated two-mode squeezed light, which interacts with a phase shifter and is then squeezed again before detection. Our theoretical device has the potential to reach far below the shot-noise limit in phase sensitivity. This new proposal avoids the pitfalls of other setups, such as difficulty in creating the required resource. Furthermore, our scheme requires no complicated detection protocol, relying instead only on simple intensity measurement. Also, bright, coherent sources 'boost' squeezed light, creating a very sensitive device. This hybrid scheme relies on no unknown components and can be constructed with current technology. In this paper, we present our analysis of this relatively straightforward device, using the operator propagation method. We derive the phase sensitivity and provide a simple numerical example of the power of our new proposal. Sensitivity to unknown phase shifts scales as a shot-noise-limited Mach–Zehnder interferometer, multiplied by a sub-Heisenberg contribution from the squeezed light.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum-mechanical noise in an interferometer
Caves, C. M. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.1693 · Cited by 3,202
Quantum optical metrology – the lowdown on high-N00N states
Dowling, J. P. (2008) · Contemporary Physics · doi:10.1080/00107510802091298 · Cited by 894
Self-citationSuper-resolving phase measurements with a multiphoton entangled state
Mitchell, M. W., Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02493 · Cited by 830
Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06257 · Cited by 628
De Broglie wavelength of a non-local four-photon state
Walther, P., Pan, J.-W., Aspelmeyer, M., Ursin, R., Gasparoni, S., & Zeilinger, A. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02552 · Cited by 555
Cited by
Quantum metrology with parametric amplifier-based photon correlation interferometers
Hudelist, F., Kong, J., Liu, C., Jing, J., Ou, Z. Y., & Zhang, W. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms4049 · Cited by 437
Nonlinear interferometers in quantum optics
Chekhova, M. V., & Ou, Z. Y. (2016) · Advances in Optics and Photonics · doi:10.1364/aop.8.000104 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Plick, W. N., Dowling, J. P., & Agarwal, G. S.
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2010-08-06
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 083014
- ISSN
- 1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2160327031
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 3.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coherent-light-boosted, sub-shot noise, quantum interferometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083014
- The paper
- Plick, W. N., Dowling, J. P., & Agarwal, G. S. (2010). Coherent-light-boosted, sub-shot noise, quantum interferometry. New Journal of Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/12/8/083014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.