Cited by 80Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein CondensatesQuantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet; none of the 19 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Relativistic quantum mechanics with trapped ions

Open access
Lamata, L, Casanova, J, Gerritsma, R, Roos, C F, García-Ripoll, J J, Solano, E·2011·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

We consider the quantum simulation of relativistic quantum mechanics, as described by the Dirac equation and classical potentials, in trapped-ion systems. We concentrate on three problems of growing complexity. Firstly, we study the bidimensional relativistic scattering of single Dirac particles by a linear potential. Secondly, we explore the case of a Dirac particle in a magnetic field and its topological properties. Finally, we analyze the problem of two Dirac particles that are coupled by a controllable and confining potential. The latter interaction may be useful to study important phenomena such as the confinement and asymptotic freedom of quarks.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The paper proposes trapped-ion quantum simulations of relativistic quantum mechanics, covering 2+1-dimensional Dirac scattering, Dirac particles in magnetic fields, and two interacting Dirac particles as an analogue of the MIT bag model. It argues that trapped ions can controllably realize these Dirac dynamics and topological or confinement-related phenomena with current or near-term techniques.

Key findings

  • For 2+1 Klein scattering with a linear potential, the problem reduces to an effective 1+1 Klein Hamiltonian for each transverse momentum \(p_y\); Klein tunneling is rapidly suppressed as \(p_y\) increases, and “already at \(p_y = 1\) almost all of the wave function gets reflected” in the reported simulation with \(h=c=\alpha=1\), \(m=0.5\).
  • The 2+1 scattering shows entanglement between the transmitted/reflected wave packets in \(x\) and the transverse momentum wave packet in \(y\), allowing pair creation to be controlled by incidence angle \(p_y/p_x\).
  • A Dirac particle in a uniform 2D magnetic field maps to a detuned Jaynes-Cummings model; its Landau levels have Wigner-function pseudospin textures with topological charge \(\nu=\pm n\), where \(n=0\) gives a single covering of the sphere and \(n=2\) a double covering. Pure dephasing does not modify the charge, and spontaneous emission leaves the winding on the \(\{S_x,S_y\}\) plane unaffected, though total dissipation/friction can unwrap the sphere.
  • Three trapped ions with two motional modes can simulate two Dirac particles coupled by a quadratic confining potential \(V_0(x_1-x_2)^2\), an analogue of the MIT bag model; numerical simulations with \(P_{cm}=2\), \(mc^2=1\), \(V_0=0.5\) show quasifree/asymptotic-freedom-like behavior for \(p_r=0\), \(\Xi=+1\), more complex confinement-like dynamics for \(p_r=2\), \(\Xi=+1\), and larger Klein tunneling for \(p_r=2\), \(\Xi=-1\).

Methods

  • Theoretical proposal and numerical simulation: Dirac bispinors are encoded in trapped-ion internal levels, while motional modes are manipulated with Jaynes-Cummings, anti-Jaynes-Cummings, and carrier interactions to realize terms \(\sigma_i p_i\) and mass terms \(mc^2\sigma_j\).
  • For 2+1 Klein scattering, two trapped ions in a linear Paul trap with modes \(\nu_{cm}=\nu\) and \(\nu_{st}=\sqrt{3}\nu\) are proposed; red/blue sidebands and an ac-Stark shift implement the Hamiltonian, with motional-state measurement via mapping to internal states and fluorescence/tomography.
  • For the magnetic-field case, the Dirac Hamiltonian is rewritten as a detuned Jaynes-Cummings model, and Wigner-function reconstruction is proposed using an ancillary ion measured conditionally on the spinor ion. For the two-Dirac-particle MIT-bag analogue, three ions and normal modes are used, with numerical simulations of the relative-coordinate dynamics.

Limitations

  • The paper states that arbitrary 2+1 potentials \(V(x,y)\) cannot be reduced to a set of 1+1 problems, and that classical simulation then approaches computational limits; finite-difference/Fourier representations and Trotter methods introduce errors from time discretization and boundary conditions.
  • For the two-Dirac-particle model, the authors state they were “severely limited by the problem size and complexity,” preventing studies such as adiabatic preparation of eigenstates, full diagonalization of the spectrum, or longer-time dynamics.
  • Evident from the text: the work is a theoretical and numerical proposal, not an experimental realization; experimental feasibility is discussed for Ca\(^+\) ions and requires the Lamb-Dicke approximation, with stated parameters such as \(\eta\sim0.05\), coherence times of several ms, and coupling strengths of a few 100 kHz.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/13/9/095003

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 19 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    The n=0 state is equivalent to a single covering of the sphere, or skyrmion, with topological charge ν=1.

    “This is equivalent to a single covering of the sphere, or skyrmion, with a topological charge 8 ν = 1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    State n=2 performs a double covering of the sphere.

    “moving on to state n = 2, which performs a double covering of the sphere.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The model can be rewritten as a simple JC model with a detuning, H = c√2(σ+ a + a† σ-) + mc^2 σ_z.

    “we may rewrite the previous model as a simple JC model with a detuning, H = c mc p x + ix p x -ix -mc = c √ 2(σ + a + a † σ -) + mc 2 σ z .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    In the axial gauge A(x,y)=Bx, the momentum along the y-direction is a constant of motion ([p_y,H]=0).

    “In this setup, the momentum along the y-direction becomes a constant of motion, [ p y , H ] = 0.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingreasoning

    The model has a ladder of discrete energy eigenstates E ±n = ±√(2c^2 n^2 + m^2 c^4), the Landau levels.

    “This model has a ladder of discrete energy eigenstates, E ±n = ± √ 2c 2 n 2 + m 2 c 4 ,(23) the so-called Landau levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 25
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 10
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    For the n=2 Landau level, despite dissipation trying to unwrap the sphere, the defects remained pinned and the total number was constant even for long times.

    “Note how, despite the effort to unwrap the sphere, the defects remained pinned and the total number was constant even for long times.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    The wave functions of these levels are confined along x and form plane waves along the y direction.

    “The wave functions of these levels are confined along 'x' and form plane waves along the 'y' direction:”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Findingnone given

    Pure dephasing along z is equivalent to a shrinking of the transverse components s(t) = (s_x e^{-γt}, s_y e^{-γt}, s_z).

    “Pure dephasing, for instance along the 'z' direction, is equivalent to a shrinking of the transverse components s(t) = (s x e -γ t , s y e -γ t , s z ).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingreasoning

    After suitable rescaling via a new normalization factor in equation (27), the total solid angle covered is the same and the charge ν is not modified under pure dephasing.

    “However, after suitable rescaling via a new normalization factor in equation ( 27), one finds that the total solid angle covered is the same and the charge ν is not modified.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    For the n=0 state, the pseudospin points North in the center of phase space and rotates to the South at r→∞.

    “For the n = 0 state, we see that the pseudospin points North in the center of the phase space and rotates to the South at r = x 2 + p 2 → ∞.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    In the 2+1 simulation, the transmitted wave function is squeezed and the reflected wave function broadens after collision with the potential barrier.

    “The most obvious effect is the squeezing of the transmitted and the broadening of the reflected wave functions after the collision with the potential barrier.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingreasoning

    For motional Hilbert spaces of around 200 phonons per mode, the Hilbert space dimension is 2×200 for the 1+1 case and 8×10^4 for the 2+1 case.

    “This means that, for reasonable sizes of motional Hilbert spaces of around 200 phonons per mode, one would have a Hilbert space dimension of 2 × 200 for the (1 + 1)-dimensional case.On the other hand, for the 2+1 case considered here, one would have a Hilbert space dimension of 8 × 10 4 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Findingown data

    For = +1 and p_r = 2, the dynamics of the two-fermion system is more involved: the wave function evolves in a more complex way for larger relative momentum, splitting up, bouncing back and getting distorted.

    “For = +1 and pr = 2, the dynamics of the two-fermion system is more involved: the wave function evolves in a more complex way for larger relative momentum, splitting up, bouncing back and getting distorted.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The trapped-ion Hamiltonian in 3+1 dimensions coincides with the Dirac equation Hamiltonian in 3+1 dimensions, with the speed of light and rest energy given by c := 2ηΩ and mc^2 := hΩ.

    “it coincides with the Dirac equation Hamiltonian in 3 + 1 dimensions, equation (2), with the equivalences for the speed of light and rest energy,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By changing laser intensities, one may explore the transition from massless to massive Dirac fermions, or equivalently from ultrarelativistic to nonrelativistic physics.

    “Thus, one may explore the transition from massless to massive Dirac fermions or, equivalently, the transition from ultrarelativistic to nonrelativistic physics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    The resulting statistics and accuracy should be more than enough to allow for accurate reconstruction of the ν=1 and ν=2 skyrmions.

    “The resulting statistics and accuracy should be more than enough to allow for accurate reconstruction of the ν = 1 and ν = 2 skyrmions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The energy band curvature induced by m(p_y) is associated with a momentum-dependent group velocity v_g(p_x) ∼ dE/dp_x = c^2 p_x / sqrt(c^2 p_x^2 + m(p_y)^2 c^4).

    “To understand this phenomenon, we must realize that the energy band curvature induced by m( p y ) is associated with a momentum-dependent group velocity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    Topologically nontrivial models are those for which the mapping from momenta to spinor state winds up one or more times on the same sphere.

    “The topologically nontrivial models are those for which this mapping winds up one or more times on the same sphere.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisenone given

    The standard quantum field theory explanation of the Klein paradox is that there is enough energy in the system to produce a particle/antiparticle pair.

    “The standard explanation in quantum field theory is that there is enough energy in the system to produce a particle/antiparticle pair.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The simulations presented in the paper are well within the limits of what can be accurately simulated, both in time and in space.

    “and even the simulations presented here are well within the limits of what can be accurately simulated, both in time and in space.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The Hamiltonian for the Dirac particle in the field has a direct reinterpretation in terms of a detuned JC model (22), which makes its simulation rather straightforward.

    “Regarding the experimental implementation, the Hamiltonian for the Dirac particle in the field has, as we have shown, a direct reinterpretation in terms of a detuned JC model (22), which makes its simulation rather straightforward.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Measurement of the Wigner function is possible using standard trapped ion techniques [50], but reconstruction must be performed without tracing out the internal state of the ion.

    “Measurement of the Wigner function is also possible using standard trapped ion techniques [50], but now the reconstruction has to be performed without tracing out the internal state of the ion.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [50] source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    At the splitting point, a narrow band of p_x components is filtered and becomes part of the antiparticle branch, moving with very little spreading and almost uniform group velocity.

    “At this point, which is when the particle splits into a transmitted and a reflected component, a narrow band of p x -components will be filtered and become part of the antiparticle branch, moving on with very little spreading and almost uniform group velocity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    In the 2+1 Dirac equation with a linear potential along x and constant along y, p_y is a constant of motion, so the problem can be solved for each value of p_y.

    “In order to analyze this dynamics, one can point out that p y is a constant of motion: [H Kl,2+1 D , p y ] = 0, such that one may solve the problem for each value of p y .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Interpretationnone given

    Working on quantum simulations may offer a new perspective on quantum optical problems.

    “So far, we have seen examples in which the trapped-ion simulation may be used to learn more about the Dirac equation, but the converse is also true: working on the quantum simulations may offer a new perspective on quantum optical problems.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These efficient simulation techniques are not without errors and are severely affected by discretizations of time and boundary conditions.

    “However, none of these techniques are without errors.They are severely affected by discretizations of time and also by the boundary conditions,”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationnone given

    For a nontrivial potential V(x,y) = α_x x^2 + α_y y^2, simplification into a set of 1+1 problems cannot be done, and the full bidimensional problem must be considered.

    “We point out that, when considering a nontrivial potential V (x, y) in the xand ycoordinates, say V (x, y) = α x x 2 + α y y 2 , which could be implemented with three ions in the dispersive limit, its simplification into a set of 1+1 problems cannot be done anymore, and the full bidimensional problem has to be considered.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The energy band of a 2D free Dirac fermion can be seen as a mapping from momenta (k_x,k_y) to a particular spinor state on the sphere.

    “Roughly, in this context the energy band of a twodimensional (2D) free Dirac fermion can be seen as a mapping from momenta, (k x , k y ), to a particular spinor state on the sphere, S ∈ S, obtained from the Dirac wave function.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [54] source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    One could control pair production by changing the incidence angle p_y/p_x, and even perform quantum logic on pair creation conditional to the transverse momentum.

    “Thus, one could control pair production just by changing the incidence angle, p y / p x , and even perform quantum logic on pair creation conditional to the value of the transverse momentum.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The reflected component sees the whole curvature of the energy band and becomes very broad very quickly until it reaches relativistic velocities and stops spreading.

    “The reflected component, on the other hand, will get to see the whole curvature of the energy band and become very broad very quickly, until it reaches relativistic velocities (v g c) and stops spreading.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The MIT bag model in its simplest version consists of two or more Dirac particles contained inside a volume whose energy grows linearly with the volume.

    “In its simplest version, it consists of two or more Dirac particles contained inside a volume, a bag, whose energy grows linearly with the volume.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [47] source
    • cites [48] source
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    The Zitterbewegung amplitude can be measurable in an experiment, as was shown in the 1+1 case.

    “and R ZB ≈ , if η ˜ ∼ , which can be measurable in an experiment, as was shown in the 1 + 1 case in [10].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] source
    • The authors state this as an assumption: In the trapped-ion simulation, the position of the ion can be identified with the position of the simulated Dirac particle.
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationown data

    This quasifree dynamics may be a signature of asymptotic freedom, because the Dirac fermions do not couple much.

    “This may be a signature of asymptotic freedom, because the Dirac fermions do not couple much, as seen in figure 4(a).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Quantum simulations of these models with state-of-the-art technology could already go beyond what can be computed classically (for large motional Hilbert space dimensions).

    “In addition, quantum simulations of these models with state-of-the-art technology could already go beyond what can be computed classically (for large motional Hilbert space dimensions).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The implementation of the proposed quantum simulations requires the validity of the Lamb-Dicke approximation, which for Ca+ ions in a trap with secular frequency of ∼1 MHz and manipulated with 729 nm laser light is well justified (η ∼ 0.05) [13].

    “The implementation of the proposed quantum simulations requires the validity of the Lamb-Dicke approximation, which for Ca + ions in a trap with secular frequency of ∼1 MHz and manipulated with 729 nm laser light is well justified (the Lamb-Dicke parameter η ∼ 0.05 1) [13].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Quantum simulations of relativistic quantum mechanics may soon allow us to consider problems that are difficult or even impossible for classical computers.

    “At the same time, among other research lines, quantum simulations of relativistic quantum mechanics may soon allow us to consider problems that are difficult or even impossible for classical computers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This could allow the implementation in a table-top experiment of quark confinement and asymptotic freedom associated with QCD, while moving from one regime to the other by switching on and off a laser.

    “This could allow the implementation in a table-top experiment of quark confinement and asymptotic freedom associated with QCD, while moving from one regime to the other by switching on and off a laser.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Such states can have coherence times of several ms, while coupling strengths of a few 100 kHz between the spinor states can be obtained.

    “Such states can have coherence times of several ms, while coupling strengths of a few 100 kHz between the spinor states can be obtained.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was severely limited by problem size and complexity, preventing study of adiabatic preparation of eigenstates, full diagonalization of the spectrum, or longer time dynamics.

    “For example, here, we were severely limited by the problem size and complexity, preventing us from studying things like adiabatic preparation of eigenstates, a full diagonalization of the spectrum or longer time dynamics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In recent experiments [13], it has been shown that the motional state of the ions can be coherently manipulated while reaching states that have >100 phonons on average, and the coherence can be sustained for more than 10 ms.

    “In recent experiments [13], it has been shown that the motional state of the ions can be coherently manipulated while reaching states that have >100 phonons on average, and the coherence can be sustained for more than 10 ms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] source
35 of 35
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    In the trapped-ion simulation, the position of the ion can be identified with the position of the simulated Dirac particle.

    “In the trapped-ion simulation, the position of the ion mimics the position of the simulated Dirac particle.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The MIT bag model has quite good agreement with experiments and predictive power.

    “Although these models can be solved on a classical computer, and are phenomenological, they have quite good agreement with experiments and predictive power.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The model H_ABM cannot be solved analytically.

    “This model could describe a quark and an antiquark coupled by gluons inside a meson, and cannot be solved analytically.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The usual explanation for Klein tunneling in quantum field theory is the creation of a particle/antiparticle pair.

    “This is the natural interpretation, given that the usual explanation for Klein tunneling in quantum field theory is the creation of a particle/antiparticle pair.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In QCD, the splitting of a hadron into new hadrons is well known and takes place, for example, in jet emission in high-energy colliders.

    “In QCD, the splitting of a hadron into new hadrons is well known and takes place, for example, in the jet emission in high-energy colliders.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    QCD becomes non-perturbative at low energies and long distances such that Feynman-diagram expansion cannot be applied.

    “On the other hand, for low energies and long distances the theory becomes non-perturbative (because the coupling becomes too large) such that Feynman-diagram expansion cannot be applied.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The application of a state-dependent displacement operation on ion 2 followed by a measurement of σ_z^1 is equivalent to measuring the observable Σ.

    “The application of a state-dependent displacement operation on ion 2, U 2 ¼ exp½Àikð1 y Þ p x =2, generated by resonant blue and red sidebands, followed by a measurement of 1 z , is equivalent to measuring the observable [13]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Figure 3 uses different Landau-level labels in the text and caption

    Minor

    The discussion identifies the levels plotted in Figure 3 as n = ±1 and n = ±2, while the caption identifies them as n = 0 and n = 1.

  • Covering-number formula conflicts with the stated examples

    Minor

    The stated formula ν = ±n assigns zero coverings to n = 0 and one to n = 1. The Figure 3 caption instead says those levels cover the sphere once and twice, respectively.

2 of 2

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 80

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Schrödinger E, 1930, Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. Kl., 24, 418

Metadata

Authors
Lamata, L., Casanova, J., Gerritsma, R., Roos, C. F., García-Ripoll, J. J., & Solano, E.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Austrian Academy of Sciences (AT)
  • Ikerbasque (ES)
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2011-09-06
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
095003
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028216166
Cited by
80
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (IT-472-10, IT472)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (FIS2009-12773-C02-01, QUITEMAD S2009-ESP-1594)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
relativistic quantum mechanics, Dirac equation, trapped ions, quantum simulation, linear potential, relativistic scattering, magnetic field, topological properties, confining potential, quark confinement, asymptotic freedom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review