Area laws and efficient descriptions of quantum many-body states
Open accessAbstract
It is commonly believed that area laws for entanglement entropies imply that a quantum many-body state can be faithfully represented by efficient tensor network states—a conjecture frequently stated in the context of numerical simulations and analytical considerations. In this work, we show that this is in general not the case, except in one-dimension. We prove that the set of quantum many-body states that satisfy an area law for all Renyi entropies contains a subspace of exponential dimension. We then show that there are states satisfying area laws for all Renyi entropies but cannot be approximated by states with a classical description of small Kolmogorov complexity, including polynomial projected entangled pair states or states of multi-scale entanglement renormalisation. Not even a quantum computer with post-selection can efficiently prepare all quantum states fulfilling an area law, and we show that not all area law states can be eigenstates of local Hamiltonians. We also prove translationally and rotationally invariant instances of these results, and show a variation with decaying correlations using quantum error-correcting codes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PEPS can provide a memory-efficient representation relative to MPS for some states with geometrically constrained patterns of entanglement and correlation, in particular a subset of area-law entangled states, when virtual indices are chosen to match the target topology.
“For some states subject to geometrically constrained patterns of entanglement and correlation, in particular a subset of those exhibiting area-law entanglement, PEPS can provide a memory-efficient representation relative to MPS when virtual indices (bonds) are chosen to match the target topology 49,93 .”
From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [93]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592 · see citing works
Class of quantum error-correcting codes saturating the quantum Hamming bound
Gottesman, D. (1996) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.54.1862 · Cited by 1,227 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277 · DOI · Paper page
- Hastings M B, 2007, J. Stat. Mech., 2007
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.195145 · DOI
- 10.1038/nphys2747 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.060503 · DOI
- Cramer M, 2006, New J. Phys., 8, 71, 10.1088/1367-2630/8/5/071 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012309 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.170501 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115134 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.035114 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052104 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.060504 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/14789940801912366 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.030504 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.094423 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.220405 · DOI
- 10.1142/S0219749907003171 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-0-387-49820-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1090/psapm/068 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.170501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.120501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1098/rspa.2005.1546 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00220-006-0030-4 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.104431 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.035107 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.075102 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165139 · DOI
- 10.1145/237814.238004 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167902 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation
King, A. D., Nocera, A., Rams, M. M., Dziarmaga, J., Wiersema, R., Bernoudy, W., Raymond, J., Kaushal, N., Heinsdorf, N., Harris, R., et al. (2025) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ado6285 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Time evolution of an infinite projected entangled pair state: Neighborhood tensor update
Dziarmaga, J. (2021) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.094411 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ge, Y., & Eisert, J.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
- Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Eisert, Jens
- Venue
- New Journal of Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-08-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 083026
- ISSN
- 1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2963370031
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 2.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Q.com)
- European Research Council (TAQ)
- European Commission (RAQUEL, SIQS)
- Cordis (AQUS)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Keywords
- area law, entanglement entropy, Rényi entropy, tensor network states, quantum many-body states, Kolmogorov complexity, projected entangled pair states, post-selection, local Hamiltonians, translationally invariant states, quantum error-correcting codes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review