Cited by 53Quantum many-body systemsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and Cryptography

Area laws and efficient descriptions of quantum many-body states

Open access
Ge, Yimin, Eisert, Jens·2016·New Journal of Physics

Abstract

It is commonly believed that area laws for entanglement entropies imply that a quantum many-body state can be faithfully represented by efficient tensor network states—a conjecture frequently stated in the context of numerical simulations and analytical considerations. In this work, we show that this is in general not the case, except in one-dimension. We prove that the set of quantum many-body states that satisfy an area law for all Renyi entropies contains a subspace of exponential dimension. We then show that there are states satisfying area laws for all Renyi entropies but cannot be approximated by states with a classical description of small Kolmogorov complexity, including polynomial projected entangled pair states or states of multi-scale entanglement renormalisation. Not even a quantum computer with post-selection can efficiently prepare all quantum states fulfilling an area law, and we show that not all area law states can be eigenstates of local Hamiltonians. We also prove translationally and rotationally invariant instances of these results, and show a variation with decaying correlations using quantum error-correcting codes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1367-2630/18/8/083026

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PEPS can provide a memory-efficient representation relative to MPS for some states with geometrically constrained patterns of entanglement and correlation, in particular a subset of area-law entangled states, when virtual indices are chosen to match the target topology.

    “For some states subject to geometrically constrained patterns of entanglement and correlation, in particular a subset of those exhibiting area-law entanglement, PEPS can provide a memory-efficient representation relative to MPS when virtual indices (bonds) are chosen to match the target topology 49,93 .”

    From Beyond-classical computation in quantum simulation (2025) · cites this paper as [93]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.277 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Hastings M B, 2007, J. Stat. Mech., 2007
  3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.195145 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/nphys2747 · DOI
  5. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.060503 · DOI
  6. Cramer M, 2006, New J. Phys., 8, 71, 10.1088/1367-2630/8/5/071 · DOI
  7. 10.1103/PhysRevA.73.012309 · DOI
  8. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.170501 · DOI
  9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115134 · DOI
  10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.035114 · DOI
  11. 10.1103/PhysRevA.80.052104 · DOI
  12. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.060504 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/14789940801912366 · DOI
  15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.030504 · DOI
  16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.094423 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.220405 · DOI
  18. 10.1142/S0219749907003171 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/978-0-387-49820-1 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1090/psapm/068 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.170501 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.120501 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1098/rspa.2005.1546 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s00220-006-0030-4 · DOI
  25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.104431 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.035107 · DOI
  27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.075102 · DOI
  28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165139 · DOI
  29. 10.1145/237814.238004 · DOI
  30. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.167902 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ge, Y., & Eisert, J.
Affiliations
  • Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics (DE)
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Eisert, Jens
Venue
New Journal of Physics
Published
2016-08-05
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
083026
ISSN
1367-2630 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963370031
Cited by
53
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Journal of Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Q.com)
  • European Research Council (TAQ)
  • European Commission (RAQUEL, SIQS)
  • Cordis (AQUS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
area law, entanglement entropy, Rényi entropy, tensor network states, quantum many-body states, Kolmogorov complexity, projected entangled pair states, post-selection, local Hamiltonians, translationally invariant states, quantum error-correcting codes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review