Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 90Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational Theory

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 81 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 55 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Strings in an electric field, and the Milne Universe

Open access
Berkooz, M, Pioline, B·2003·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

Arguably the simplest model of a cosmological singularity in string theory, the Lorentzian orbifold ℝ 1,1 /boost is known to lead to severe divergences in scattering amplitudes of untwisted states, indicating a large backreaction towards the singularity. In this work we take a first step in investigating whether condensation of twisted states may remedy this problem and resolve the spacelike singularity. By using the formal analogy with charged open strings in an electric field, we argue that, contrary to earlier claims, twisted sectors do contain physical scattering states, which can be viewed as charged particles in an electric field. Correlated pairs of twisted states will therefore be produced by the ordinary Schwinger mechanism. For open strings in an electric field, on-shell wave functions for the zero-modes are determined, and shown to analytically continue to non-normalizable modes of the usual Landau harmonic oscillator in Euclidean space. Closed string scattering states of the Milne orbifold continue to non-normalizable modes in an unusual Euclidean orbifold of ℝ 2 by a rotation by an irrational angle. Irrespective of the formal analogy with the Milne Universe, open strings in a constant electric field, or colliding D-branes, may also serve as a useful laboratory to study time-dependence in string theory.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

The paper argues that twisted sectors of the Lorentzian orbifold \(R^{1,1}/\text{boost}\) (the Milne Universe) do contain physical scattering states, contrary to earlier claims, by analogy with charged open strings in a constant electric field. It proposes a zero-mode quantization yielding a continuous spectrum of delta-normalizable states and Schwinger pair production, and gives a Euclidean continuation to non-normalizable modes and an unusual rotation orbifold.

Key findings

  • Twisted-sector zero modes behave as charged particles in an electric field: the inverted harmonic oscillator has a continuum of delta-normalizable states with real positive \(M^2\), with reflection and transmission coefficients \(R=-1/(1+e^{-\pi M^2/\nu})\), \(T=1/(1+e^{\pi M^2/\nu})\), satisfying \(R^2=1+T^2\); the stimulated pair-creation rate is \(\eta=R^2-1\).
  • The vacuum persistence amplitude is \(|0,\text{in}|0,\text{out}|^2=\exp[-\int dp\,\ln(1+e^{-\pi M^2/\nu})]\), agreeing with the two-dimensional Schwinger creation rate. In Milne space, the semi-classical pair-production distribution is \(w(X^+,X^-)=1/[(j-\nu X^+X^-)^2+2M^2 X^+X^-]\), diverging on the light-cone and in the whiskers; for \(M^2=0\) the total number of produced pairs is logarithmically divergent.
  • Analytic continuation maps the electric field to a Euclidean magnetic field and the Milne orbifold to a Euclidean rotation orbifold by angle \(\beta\), with non-normalizable modes rather than the usual localized twisted states; for irrational \(\beta\), smoothness requires winding/spectrally flowed states.
  • Low-lying physical states include a bosonic open-string tachyon with \(M^2=k_i^2+\nu^2-2\), a first-excited gauge boson with \(D-2\) transverse degrees of freedom despite a \(\nu^2\) mass-squared gap, and closed-string twisted sectors with scalar tachyon at level \((0,0)\), massless graviton with \((D-2)^2\) transverse degrees at \((1,1)\), and gauge bosons at \((0,1)/(1,0)\) with boost momentum \(\pm 2\pi/(w\beta)\).

Methods

  • First-quantized string theory: charged open strings in a constant electric field and closed strings in the \(w\)-twisted sector of \(R^{1,1}/\text{boost}\), with the identification \(w\beta=-2\pi\nu=-2\,\text{arcth}(\pi e_0)\) for \(e_1=0\).
  • Zero-mode quantization via the charged Klein-Gordon equation in static coordinates (inverted harmonic oscillator), Rindler coordinates (Whittaker functions), and light-cone coordinates; old covariant quantization is used for levels 0 and 1, and one-loop amplitudes are compared.
  • Analytic continuation to Euclidean signature: rotate \(t=-i\tau\), \(\nu=i b\) for the electric-to-magnetic case, and \(\beta=i\theta\) for the Milne-to-rotation-orbifold case; non-normalizable vertex operators and Wilson-line observables are outlined.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the dynamics and backreaction are not solved: whether twisted-state condensation resolves the singularity or prevents the circle from reaching zero size cannot be decided by the analogy alone; the D-brane collision outcome depends on production versus recombination and bound-state formation.
  • It states that the physical interpretation of the Milne one-loop amplitude is obscured by poles in the fundamental domain, twisted vertex operators are left for future work, and the Euclidean continuation proposal “clearly more work is needed to establish its terms of usage.”
  • Evident from the text: the analysis is largely kinematic/first-quantized, relies on a formal analogy between open strings in an electric field and closed strings in the Milne orbifold, and does not compute the full backreacted S-matrix or resolve the non-perturbative multi-particle condensation problem.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2003/11/007

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 9 Not valid · 36 Not checked · 178 Own results and interpretations

119 more claims

Create a free account to see all 223 claims and to verify the 49 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 69
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 35
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 3

Create a free account to see these claims.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

3 of 3

Citations

Cites

Show all 81 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Berkooz, M., & Pioline, B.
Affiliations
  • Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
  • Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Energies (FR)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2003-11-17
Volume
2003
Issue
11
Pages
007-007
ISSN
1475-7516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1976678443
Cited by
88
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Minerva Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
Milne universe, cosmological singularity, twisted states, Schwinger mechanism, backreaction, string cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.