The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
f(R) actions, cosmic acceleration and local tests of gravity
Open accessAbstract
We study spherically symmetric solutions in f ( R ) theories and its compatibility with local tests of gravity. We start by clarifying the range of validity of the weak field expansion and show that, for many models proposed to address the dark energy problem, this expansion breaks down in realistic situations. This invalidates the conclusions of several papers that make inappropriate use of this expansion. For the stable models that modify gravity only at small curvatures we find that when the asymptotic background curvature is large we approximately recover the solutions of Einstein gravity through the so-called Chameleon mechanism, as a result of the non-linear dynamics of the extra scalar degree of freedom contained in the metric. In these models one would observe a transition from Einstein to scalar-tensor gravity as the Universe expands and the background curvature diminishes. Assuming an adiabatic evolution we estimate the redshift at which this transition would take place for a source with given mass and radius. We also show that models of dynamical dark energy claimed to be compatible with tests of gravity because the mass of the scalar is large in vacuum (e.g. those that also include R 2 corrections in the action) are not viable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A test of general relativity using radio links with the Cassini spacecraft
Bertotti, B., Iess, L., & Tortora, P. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01997 · Cited by 2,017
Cited by
Sotiriou, T. P., & Faraoni, V. (2010) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 · Cited by 4,519
Beyond the cosmological standard model
Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., & Trodden, M. (2015) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002 · Cited by 1,231
Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
The Euclid Theory Working Group, Amendola, L., Appleby, S., Bacon, D., Baker, T., Baldi, M., Bartolo, N., Blanchard, A., Bonvin, C., Borgani, S., et al. (2013) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2013-6 · Cited by 899
Class of viable modifiedf(R)gravities describing inflation and the onset of accelerated expansion
Cognola, G., Elizalde, E., Nojiri, S., Odintsov, S. D., Sebastiani, L., & Zerbini, S. (2008) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.046009 · Cited by 871
Construction of cosmologically viable gravity models
De Felice, A., & Tsujikawa, S. (2009) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.03.060 · Cited by 366
Metadata
- Authors
- Navarro, I., & Acoleyen, K. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-02-19
- Volume
- 2007
- Issue
- 02
- Pages
- 022-022
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W2100133232
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: f(R) actions, cosmic acceleration and local tests of gravity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1475-7516/2007/02/022
- The paper
- Navarro, I., & Acoleyen, K. V. (2007). f(R) actions, cosmic acceleration and local tests of gravity. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2007/02/022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.