Cited by 72Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

Scalar field perturbations in Hořava-Lifshitz cosmology

Open access
Wang, Anzhong, Wands, David, Maartens, Roy·2010·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

We study perturbations of a scalar field cosmology in Hořava-Lifshitz gravity, adopting the most general setup without detailed balance but with the projectability condition. We derive the generalized Klein-Gordon equation, which is sixth-order in spatial derivatives. Then we investigate scalar field perturbations coupled to gravity in a flat Friedmann-Robertson-Walker background. In the sub-horizon regime, the metric and scalar field modes have independent oscillations with different frequencies and phases except in particular cases. On super-horizon scales, the perturbations become adiabatic during slow-roll inflation driven by a single field, and the comoving curvature perturbation is constant.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2010/03/013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perturbations for Hořava-Lifshitz theory have been worked out; the growth equations are different from those of GR and offer the possibility to test these theories using large-scale structure.

    “Perturbations for the Hořava–Lifshitz theory have been worked out in a number of papers including (Mukohyama 2009b; Gao et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2010a; Wang 2010). The growth equations are different from those of GR and offer the possibility to test these theories using large-scale structure.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Wang et al. 2010a

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 73 · Cited by 72

Authors
Wang, A., Wands, D., & Maartens, R.
Affiliations
  • Baylor University (US)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2010-03-09
Volume
2010
Issue
03
Pages
013-013
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2122217824
Cited by
72
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Science and Technology Facilities Council (PP/E001033/1, ST/F002335/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
Hořava-Lifshitz gravity, scalar perturbations, Klein-Gordon equation, slow-roll inflation, comoving curvature perturbation, modified gravity cosmology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review