Cited by 63Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, PhenomenaDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena

Halo modelling in chameleon theories

Open access
Lombriser, Lucas, Koyama, Kazuya, Li, Baojiu·2014·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

We analyse modelling techniques for the large-scale structure formed in scalar-tensor theories of constant Brans-Dicke parameter which match the concordance model background expansion history and produce a chameleon suppression of the gravitational modification in high-density regions. Thereby, we use a mass and environment dependent chameleon spherical collapse model, the Sheth-Tormen halo mass function and linear halo bias, the Navarro-Frenk-White halo density profile, and the halo model. Furthermore, using the spherical collapse model, we extrapolate a chameleon mass-concentration scaling relation from a ΛCDM prescription calibrated to N -body simulations. We also provide constraints on the model parameters to ensure viability on local scales. We test our description of the halo mass function and nonlinear matter power spectrum against the respective observables extracted from large-volume and high-resolution N -body simulations in the limiting case of f ( R ) gravity, corresponding to a vanishing Brans-Dicke parameter. We find good agreement between the two; the halo model provides a good qualitative description of the shape of the relative enhancement of the f ( R ) matter power spectrum with respect to ΛCDM caused by the extra attractive gravitational force but fails to recover the correct amplitude. Introducing an effective linear power spectrum in the computation of the two-halo term to account for an underestimation of the chameleon suppression at intermediate scales in our approach, we accurately reproduce the measurements from the N -body simulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lombriser et al. (2014) and Lombriser (2014) combined the spherical collapse model, halo model, linear perturbation theory, quasi-nonlinear interpolation and one-loop perturbations to derive a description of the nonlinear matter power spectrum of f(R) gravity with chameleon screening up to k=0.1 h/Mpc.

    “Lombriser et al. (2014) and Lombriser (2014) combined the spherical collapse model, the halo model, linear perturbation theory, quasi-nonlinear interpolation motivated by the above and one-loop perturbations in order to derive a description of nonlinear the nonlinear matter power spectrum of f(R) gravity with chameleon screening on scales of up to h/Mpc.”

    From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Lombriser et al. (2014)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lombriser, L., Koyama, K., & Li, B.
Affiliations
  • Royal Observatory (GB)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2014-03-13
Volume
2014
Issue
03
Pages
021-021
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2092485800
Cited by
63
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • University of Portsmouth
  • Leverhulme Trust
  • Royal Astronomical Society
  • Durham University
  • South East Physics Network
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/I00162X/1, ST/L005573/1, ST/K00090X/1, ST/H008519/1, ST/I001166/1, ST/K00090/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Keywords
chameleon mechanism, scalar-tensor gravity, Brans-Dicke parameter, dark matter halos, halo mass function, halo bias, Navarro-Frenk-White profile, halo model, spherical collapse, concentration-mass relation, f(R) gravity, matter power spectrum, two-halo term, large-scale structure, concordance cosmology, N-body simulations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review