The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures at two loops
Open accessAbstract
Large scale structure surveys promise to be the next leading probe of cosmological information. It is therefore crucial to reliably predict their observables. The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures (EFTofLSS) provides a manifestly convergent perturbation theory for the weakly non-linear regime of dark matter, where correlation functions are computed in an expansion of the wavenumber k of a mode over the wavenumber associated with the non-linear scale k NL . Since most of the information is contained at high wavenumbers, it is necessary to compute higher order corrections to correlation functions. After the one-loop correction to the matter power spectrum, we estimate that the next leading one is the two-loop contribution, which we compute here. At this order in k / k NL , there is only one counterterm in the EFTofLSS that must be included, though this term contributes both at tree-level and in several one-loop diagrams. We also discuss correlation functions involving the velocity and momentum fields. We find that the EFTofLSS prediction at two loops matches to percent accuracy the non-linear matter power spectrum at redshift zero up to k ∼ 0.6 h Mpc −1 , requiring just one unknown coefficient that needs to be fit to observations. Given that Standard Perturbation Theory stops converging at redshift zero at k ∼ 0.1 h Mpc −1 , our results demonstrate the possibility of accessing a factor of order 200 more dark matter quasi-linear modes than naively expected. If the remaining observational challenges to accessing these modes can be addressed with similar success, our results show that there is tremendous potential for large scale structure surveys to explore the primordial universe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Cited by
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
d'Amico, G., Gleyzes, J., Kokron, N., Markovic, K., Senatore, L., Zhang, P., Beutler, F., & Gil-Marín, H. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/005 · Cited by 448
Self-citationA systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications
Heisenberg, L. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.006 · Cited by 419
The IR-resummed Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures
Senatore, L., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2015) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2015/02/013 · Cited by 260
Self-citationTowards precision constraints on gravity with the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure
Bose, B., Koyama, K., Lewandowski, M., Vernizzi, F., & Winther, H. A. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/063 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrasco, J. J. M., Foreman, S., Green, D., & Senatore, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-07-31
- Volume
- 2014
- Issue
- 07
- Pages
- 057-057
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W2051904500
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures at two loops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/057
- The paper
- Carrasco, J. J. M., Foreman, S., Green, D., & Senatore, L. (2014). The Effective Field Theory of Large Scale Structures at two loops. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.