The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Renormalized halo bias
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides a systematic study of renormalization in models of halo biasing. Building on work of McDonald, we show that Eulerian biasing is only consistent with renormalization if non-local terms and higher-derivative contributions are included in the biasing model. We explicitly determine the complete list of required bias parameters for Gaussian initial conditions, up to quartic order in the dark matter density contrast and at leading order in derivatives. At quadratic order, this means including the gravitational tidal tensor, while at cubic order the velocity potential appears as an independent degree of freedom. Our study naturally leads to an effective theory of biasing in which the halo density is written as a double expansion in fluctuations and spatial derivatives. We show that the bias expansion can be organized in terms of Galileon operators which aren't renormalized at leading order in derivatives. Finally, we discuss how the renormalized bias parameters impact the statistics of halos.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The cosmological simulation code gadget-2
Springel, V. (2005) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09655.x · Cited by 6,368
Lewis, A., Challinor, A., & Lasenby, A. (2000) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/309179 · Cited by 4,920
Galileon as a local modification of gravity
Nicolis, A., Rattazzi, R., & Trincherini, E. (2009) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.79.064036 · Cited by 1,863
Cited by
The Dark Energy Survey: more than dark energy – an overview
(2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw641 · Cited by 1,019
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Cosmological parameters from the BOSS galaxy power spectrum
Ivanov, M. M., Simonović, M., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2020) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/042 · Cited by 441
Self-citationGil-Marín, H., Bautista, J. E., Paviot, R., Vargas-Magaña, M., de la Torre, S., Fromenteau, S., Alam, S., Ávila, S., Burtin, E., Chuang, C.-H., et al. (2020) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2455 · Cited by 292
Metadata
- Authors
- Assassi, V., Baumann, D., Green, D., & Zaldarriaga, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2014-08-27
- Volume
- 2014
- Issue
- 08
- Pages
- 056-056
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W1966924254
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Renormalized halo bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/056
- The paper
- Assassi, V., Baumann, D., Green, D., & Zaldarriaga, M. (2014). Renormalized halo bias. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2014/08/056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.