The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Gravitational waves in bigravity cosmology
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we study gravitational wave perturbations in a cosmological setting of bigravity which can reproduce the ΛCDM background and large scale structure. We show that in general gravitational wave perturbations are unstable and only for very fine tuned initial conditions such a cosmology is viable. We quantify this fine tuning. We argue that similar fine tuning is also required in the scalar sector in order to prevent the tensor instability to be induced by second order scalar perturbations. Finally, we show that due to this power law instability, models of bigravity can lead to a large tensor to scalar ratio even for low scale inflation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The GW170817/GRB170817A results have no significant cosmological consequences for massive gravity and bigravity.
“For massive gravity and bimetric gravity (de Rham et al. 2011; de Rham and Gabadadze 2010; Hassan and Rosen 2012a), the new results from GW170817 and GRB170817A have no significant cosmological consequences.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Cusin et al. (2015a)
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 71 · Cited by 74
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.76.084006 · DOI
- C. de Rham, 2008, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2008, 011, 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/02/011 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.physletb.2010.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.6.3368 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.82.044020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.231101 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.041101 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP02(2012)026 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.84.064033 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.084016 · DOI
- A.E. Gümrükçüoğlu, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 006, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/006 · DOI
- D. Langlois, 2012, Class. Quant. Grav., 29, 202001, 10.1088/0264-9381/29/20/202001 · DOI
- M. Fasiello, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 035, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/11/035 · DOI
- 10.12942/lrr-2014-7 · DOI · Paper page
- D. Comelli, 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2014, 036, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/05/036 · DOI
- 10.1142/S0218271814430068 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP02(2012)126 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/JHEP04(2012)123 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP05(2013)086 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10714-014-1838-4 · DOI
- 10.1142/S0218271814430020 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124042 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP09(2014)181 · DOI
- J. Noller, 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2015, 003, 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/003 · DOI
- Y. Akrami, 2013, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2013, 046, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/10/046 · DOI
- M. Fasiello, 2013, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2013, 002, 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/12/002 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP01(2012)035 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP03(2012)067 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.044030 · DOI
- N. Tamanini, 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2014, 015, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/02/015 · DOI
- A.R. Solomon, 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2014, 066, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/066 · DOI
- M. von Strauss, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 042, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/03/042 · DOI
- M. Berg, 2012, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2012, 021, 10.1088/1475-7516/2012/12/021 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP03(2013)099 · DOI
- F. Könnig, 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2014, 029, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/03/029 · DOI
- J. Enander, 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2015, 006, 10.1088/1475-7516/2015/01/006 · DOI
- 10.1007/JHEP06(2012)085 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.084003 · DOI
- A. De Felice, 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2014, 037, 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/06/037 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.90.124014 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.88.064024 · DOI
- M. Abramowitz, 1972, Handbook of Mathematical Functions
- 10.1016/0550-3213(87)90691-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00523-8 · DOI
- P. Gratia, 2013, Class. Quant. Grav., 30, 184007, 10.1088/0264-9381/30/18/184007 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.89.027502 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.75.123518 · DOI
- J. Adamek, 2014, Class. Quant. Grav., 31, 234006, 10.1088/0264-9381/31/23/234006 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Cusin, G., Durrer, R., Guarato, P., & Motta, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- ORCID
- Cusin, Giulia
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2015-05-19
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 030-030
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W1594782861
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12
- FWCI
- 11.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
- Keywords
- bigravity, gravitational waves, cosmological perturbations, fine-tuning, large-scale structure, scalar perturbations, tensor-to-scalar ratio, inflation (cosmology)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review