Effective description of higher-order scalar-tensor theories
Open accessAbstract
Most existing theories of dark energy and/or modified gravity, involving a scalar degree of freedom, can be conveniently described within the framework of the Effective Theory of Dark Energy, based on the unitary gauge where the scalar field is uniform. We extend this effective approach by allowing the Lagrangian in unitary gauge to depend on the time derivative of the lapse function. Although this dependence generically signals the presence of an extra scalar degree of freedom, theories that contain only one propagating scalar degree of freedom, in addition to the usual tensor modes, can be constructed by requiring the initial Lagrangian to be degenerate. Starting from a general quadratic action, we derive the dispersion relations for the linear perturbations around Minkowski and a cosmological background. Our analysis directly applies to the recently introduced Degenerate Higher-Order Scalar-Tensor (DHOST) theories. For these theories, we find that one cannot recover a Poisson-like equation in the static linear regime except for the subclass that includes the Horndeski and so-called “beyond Horndeski” theories. We also discuss Lorentz-breaking models inspired by Horava gravity.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DHOST theories generalize Horndeski and beyond-Horndeski models and are the most general class of ghost-free scalar-tensor theories.
“They generalize Horndeski and beyond-Horndeski models and are the most general class of ghost-free scalar–tensor theories.”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Langlois et al. 2017a
Cites
Pogosian, L., & Silvestri, A. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.104014 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
A systematic approach to generalisations of General Relativity and their cosmological implications
Heisenberg, L. (2019) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2018.11.006 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
“Using the language of effective description of dark energy [233, 234, 235] in terms of lapse, shift and the extrinsic curvature, the quadratic action for DHOST can be written as [236]”
BackgroundEasson, D. A., & Manton, T. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.043507 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Langlois, D., Mancarella, M., Noui, K., & Vernizzi, F.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire AstroParticule et Cosmologie (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Université de Tours (FR)
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-05-17
- Volume
- 2017
- Issue
- 05
- Pages
- 033-033
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W2600450466
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 10
- FWCI
- 13.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Keywords
- DHOST, unitary gauge, degenerate Lagrangians, dispersion relation, linear perturbations, modified gravity, dark energy, Horndeski theories, beyond Horndeski theories, Poisson equation, Lorentz violation, Hořava gravity, quadratic action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review