Cited by 162Cosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nonlocal gravity. Conceptual aspects and cosmological predictions

Open access
Belgacem, Enis, Dirian, Yves, Foffa, Stefano, Maggiore, Michele·2018·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

Even if the fundamental action of gravity is local, the corresponding quantum effective action, that includes the effect of quantum fluctuations, is a nonlocal object. These nonlocalities are well understood in the ultraviolet regime but much less in the infrared, where they could in principle give rise to important cosmological effects. Here we systematize and extend previous work of our group, in which it is assumed that a mass scale Λ is dynamically generated in the infrared, giving rise to nonlocal terms in the quantum effective action of gravity. We give a detailed discussion of conceptual aspects related to nonlocal gravity (including causality, degrees of freedom, ambiguities related to the boundary conditions of the nonlocal operator, scenarios for the emergence of a dynamical scale in the infrared) and of the cosmological consequences of these models. The requirement of providing a viable cosmological evolution severely restricts the form of the nonlocal terms, and selects a model (the so-called RR model) that corresponds to a dynamical mass generation for the conformal mode. For such a model: (1) there is a FRW background evolution, where the nonlocal term acts as an effective dark energy with a phantom equation of state, providing accelerated expansion without a cosmological constant. (2) Cosmological perturbations are well behaved. (3) Implementing the model in a Boltzmann code and comparing with observations we find that the RR model fits the CMB, BAO, SNe, structure formation data and local H 0 measurements at a level statistically equivalent to ΛCDM. (4) Bayesian parameter estimation shows that the value of H 0 obtained in the RR model is higher than in ΛCDM, reducing to 2.0σ the tension with the value from local measurements. (5) The RR model provides a prediction for the sum of neutrino masses that falls within the limits set by oscillation and terrestrial experiments (in contrast to ΛCDM, where letting the sum of neutrino masses vary as a free parameter within these limits, one hits the lower bound). (6) Gravitational waves propagate at the speed of light, complying with the limit from GW170817/GRB 170817A.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2018/03/002

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 95 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. I.L. Buchbinder, 1992, Effective action in quantum gravity
  2. C.W. Misner, 1973, Gravitation
  3. S. Deser, 1967, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, 7, 149
  4. J.J. York, 1974, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, 21, 319
  5. E. Mitsou, 2015, Aspects of infrared non-local modifications of general relativity
  6. A. Schmidt-May, 2016, J. Phys., 49, 183001

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–162 of 162

Metadata

Authors
Belgacem, E., Dirian, Y., Foffa, S., & Maggiore, M.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2018-03-05
Volume
2018
Issue
03
Pages
002-002
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W2776650608
Cited by
161
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 15
FWCI
15.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Centres of Competence in Research SwissMAP
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Keywords
nonlocal gravity, effective action, conformal mode, dark energy, phantom equation of state, cosmic acceleration, cosmological perturbations, Hubble tension, sum of neutrino masses, gravitational wave speed, causality, Boltzmann code

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review