Cited by 7Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsQuantum Information and CryptographyNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Hawking radiation and the quantum marginal problem

Open access
Aurell, Erik, Eckstein, Michał, Horodecki, Paweł·2022·Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Abstract

In 1974 Steven Hawking showed that black holes emit thermal radiation, which eventually causes them to evaporate. The problem of the fate of information in this process is known as the “black hole information paradox”. Two main types of resolution postulate either a fundamental loss of information in Nature — hence the breakdown of quantum mechanics — or some sort of new physics, e.g. quantum gravity, which guarantee the global preservation of unitarity. Here we explore the second possibility with the help of recent developments in continuous-variable quantum information. Concretely, we employ the solution to the Gaussian quantum marginal problem to show that the thermality of all individual Hawking modes is consistent with a global pure state of the radiation. Surprisingly, we find out that the mods of radiation of an astrophysical black hole are thermal until the very last burst. In contrast, the single-mode thermality of Hawking radiation originating from microscopic black holes, expected to evaporate through several quanta, is not excluded, though there are constraints on modes' frequencies. Our result paves the way towards a systematic study of multi-mode correlations in Hawking radiation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/01/014

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The thermal spectrum of individual Hawking modes is perfectly consistent with the Bekenstein-Hawking formula.

    “Nevertheless, the thermal spectrum of individual Hawking modes is perfectly consistent with the Bekenstein-Hawking formula [31].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aurell, E., Eckstein, M., & Horodecki, P.
Affiliations
  • AlbaNova (SE)
  • Jagiellonian University (PL)
  • Gdańsk University of Technology (PL)
Corresponding author
  • Aurell, Erik
  • Eckstein, Michał
Venue
Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
Published
2022-01-01
Volume
2022
Issue
01
Pages
014
ISSN
  • 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-7516
OpenAlex
W4205941394
Cited by
7
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej (2018/MAB/5, 17C1/18-00)
  • Vetenskapsrådet (2020-04980)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
Hawking radiation, black hole information paradox, quantum marginal problem, black hole evaporation, unitarity, quantum gravity, continuous-variable quantum information, microscopic black holes, astrophysical black holes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review