Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,685

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation

Wang, M., Audi, G., Wapstra, A.H., Kondev, F.G., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., Pfeiffer, B.·2012·Chinese Physics C

Abstract

This paper is the second part of the new evaluation of atomic masses, Ame2012. From the results of a least-squares calculation, described in Part I, for all accepted experimental data, we derive here tables and graphs to replace those of Ame2003. The first table lists atomic masses. It is followed by a table of the influences of data on primary nuclides, a table of separation energies and reaction energies, and finally, a series of graphs of separation and decay energies. The last section in this paper lists all references to the input data used in Part I of this Ame2012 and also to the data included in the Nubase2012 evaluation (first paper in this issue).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,685

Metadata

Authors
Wang, M., Audi, G., Wapstra, A. H., Kondev, F. G., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., & Pfeiffer, B.
Venue
Chinese Physics C
Published
2012-12
Volume
36
Issue
12
Pages
1603-2014
ISSN
1674-1137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002917384
Cited by
1,685
References
0
FWCI
77.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/003
The paper
Wang, M., Audi, G., Wapstra, A. H., Kondev, F. G., MacCormick, M., Xu, X., & Pfeiffer, B. (2012). The Ame2012 atomic mass evaluation. Chinese Physics C. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/36/12/003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.